Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa M36661:Experience"

(→‎Applications of BBa_M36661)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_M36661 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_M36661 StartReviews</partinfo>
−
<!-- Template for a user review
 
−
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
−
|-
 
−
|width='10%'|
 
−
<partinfo>BBa_M36661 AddReview number</partinfo>
 
−
<I>Username</I>
 
−
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
 
ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 1—p=.239 NOT SIGNIFICANT
 
ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 1—p=.239 NOT SIGNIFICANT
 
ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 2—p=.389 NOT SIGNIFICANT
 
ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 2—p=.389 NOT SIGNIFICANT
Line 67: Line 60:
  
 
Kan plate—no growth as expected
 
Kan plate—no growth as expected
−
 
−
|};
 
−
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_M36661 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_M36661 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 19:54, 6 December 2013

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_M36661

Insert non-form[[File:Example.jpg]]atted text here

Stanford Location

Plasmid Name: fur protein, DNA 2.0 Gene #: 135239, Organism: K12 E.coli, Device Type: Sensor, Box Label: BIOE 44 F13, Barcode #'s of Glycerol Stocks: 0133011789, 0113010769, 0133009689, 0133011828, 0133009694, 0133011775(This one used to Restart Stock for Fur Sensor Project)

User Reviews

UNIQ465de19fb9211024-partinfo-00000001-QINU ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 1—p=.239 NOT SIGNIFICANT ANOVA of BETA GAL Round 2—p=.389 NOT SIGNIFICANT

Student t-test Beta Gal round 2 -4 vs -7: t= -1.43 sdev= 6.85 degrees of freedom = 14 The probability of this result, assuming the null hypothesis, is 0.18(Not significant)


-4 vs no iron: t= -1.80 sdev= 9.15 degrees of freedom = 12 The probability of this result, assuming the null hypothesis, is 0.097( not significant)

-7 vs no iron: t=-0.823 sdev= 9.03 degrees of freedom = 12 The probability of this result, assuming the null hypothesis, is 0.43(Not significant)

Our second round of experimentation did not yield a significant difference between groups, suggesting that our construct is not functional.

BOTH BETA-GAL CHARTS HERE!

The results from this first round showed a promising difference between the iron concentration of 10^-4 M and no iron, as we expected. This led us to develop a second round of experimentation for look for statistical differences with more samples. Since there was not a significant difference between the groups, we also steered away from looking for a gradient and spent our efforts testing for functionality in the second round of experimentation.

PCR photo here Explain results

FLUORESCENCE PHOTO HERE[http://www.example.com link title]

Very faint fluorescence some potential expression (I’m not sure if you want to include this one or not…I think it might be better to show the two below showing that our plasmid was indeed taken up)


Amp plate—plasmid was taken up.


Kan plate—no growth as expected UNIQ465de19fb9211024-partinfo-00000002-QINU