Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1045009:Experience"

(Plate reader data)
(Plate reader data)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>
  
As in the microscope experiments described above, the expression of the reporter was prevented even without c-di-AMP, when DarR was encoded in the vector. Hence, DarR and GFP seemed to be expressed from [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] indicating that this part is functional. We assume that the strong repression of the GFP fluorescence might result from the strong binding of DarR to its operator sequence in ''E. coli''. Mutation of the DarR operator or the DNA binding domain of DarR could possibly reduce the binding strength. This could lead to a DarR reporter system which might be controled by different c-di-AMP concentrations.
+
As in the microscope experiments described above, the expression of the reporter was prevented even without c-di-AMP, when DarR was encoded in the vector. Hence, DarR and GFP seemed to be expressed from [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] indicating that this part is functional. We assume that the strong repression of the GFP fluorescence might result from the strong binding of DarR to its operator sequence in ''E. coli''. Mutation of the DarR operator or the DNA binding domain of DarR could possibly reduce the binding strength. This could lead to a DarR reporter system which might be controlled by different c-di-AMP concentrations.
  
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===

Revision as of 17:59, 17 October 2013


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K1045009

We used this part to construct our DarR reporter system BBa_K1045017. From this system, both DarR and GFP were expressed. Though we had no proof whether the terminator fulfills its expected function, we assume that the inverted terminator BBa_K1045009 does not interfere with the operation of the DarR reporter system. For experimental data, see sections below:

Microscope data

For characterization, E. coli BL21 was transformed either with BBa_K1045017 or with BBa_K1045013 as a control. Both strains were grown in the abscence of c-di-AMP and subjected to fluorescence microscopy.

In BBa_K1045013, gfp is placed downstream of a strong promoter and the DarR operator. This vector does not encode for DarR. The strong fluorescence of the cells transformed with BBa_K1045013 (Fig. 1 top) indicated that GFP was expressed. However, when transformed with BBa_K1045017 (Fig. 1 bottom), the cells showed almost no fluorescence. In contrast to BBa_K1045013, BBa_K1045017 encodes for DarR. The low fluorescence suggested that DarR was expressed and active as a repressor down-regulating gfp transcription.


Fig. 1.: Top: E. coli transformed with a plasmid encoding BBa_K1045013 shows a strong green fluorescence under the fluorescence microscope. Bottom: E. coli transformed with a plasmid harboring the DarR reporter system BBa_K1045017 barely shows fluorescence. Both pictures represent merges of a bright field image and a GFP fluorescence image. The exposure time used to record GFP fluorescence was in both cases 2 seconds. +DarR.jpg

Plate reader data

We furthermore produced quantitative data characterizing the growth and the fluorescence over time of the BL21 E. colis we transformed with the DarR reporter system construct BBa_K1045017. As a control, we used E. coli cells harboring the BBa_K1045013 plasmid. The following graphs show the results of the plate reader experiments performed to quantify the strength of the DarR construct in E. coli. Shown are growth curves measured at the wavelength 600 nm for the cell density (Fig. 2) and 509 nm for the GFP (Fig. 3), which is encoded in the construct. For each measurement, three technical and two biological replicates were done. The graphs show the mean value of the technical replicates and one of the biological replicates. As written in the legend, a dilution series of c-di-AMP was used to test the reaction of the DarR reporter system to the nucleotide. Experimental setup: total time 21 h; 15 min measurement interval; 37°C, medium shaking; 96-well titer plate; Synergy Mx Monochromator-Based Multi-Mode Microplate Reader; Gen5 V2.01

Fig. 2: Top: Growth curve of the cells with the DarR construct; Bottom: Growth curve of the GFP Control (Cells transformed with the reporter system, but without the repressor DarR).Please enlarge the pictures for better reading. (click on them)GFP Control Growth cdiAMP.png
Fig. 2: Top: Fluorescence curve of the cells with the riboswitch construct; Bottom: Fluorescence curve of the GFP Control. Please enlarge the pictures for better reading (click on them).GFP Control Fluorescence cdiAMP.png


As in the microscope experiments described above, the expression of the reporter was prevented even without c-di-AMP, when DarR was encoded in the vector. Hence, DarR and GFP seemed to be expressed from BBa_K1045017 indicating that this part is functional. We assume that the strong repression of the GFP fluorescence might result from the strong binding of DarR to its operator sequence in E. coli. Mutation of the DarR operator or the DNA binding domain of DarR could possibly reduce the binding strength. This could lead to a DarR reporter system which might be controlled by different c-di-AMP concentrations.

User Reviews

UNIQde45a0c6cc23e1d4-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQde45a0c6cc23e1d4-partinfo-00000001-QINU