Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041002:Experience"

(→‎Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
Line 11: Line 10:
  
 
One further experiment was designed to activate the RFP gene by transforming BBa_K1041002 into a BL21 ''E.Coli'' strain along with the plasmid pET28AntA which synthesises the sigma factor AntA. It was hoped that with both plasmids in the same cell, the AntA sigma factor would be produced and activate transcription of the RFP gene by binding to the promoter sequence antGP. This would mean that the cells could be spread onto agar plates containing Chlorophenicol and the colonies would appear red under natural light. Unfortunately the colonies did not appear red.  
 
One further experiment was designed to activate the RFP gene by transforming BBa_K1041002 into a BL21 ''E.Coli'' strain along with the plasmid pET28AntA which synthesises the sigma factor AntA. It was hoped that with both plasmids in the same cell, the AntA sigma factor would be produced and activate transcription of the RFP gene by binding to the promoter sequence antGP. This would mean that the cells could be spread onto agar plates containing Chlorophenicol and the colonies would appear red under natural light. Unfortunately the colonies did not appear red.  
−
We then decided to confirm that both plasmids were in the BL21 cells by analysing the DNA by restriction enzyme digests and performing agarose gel electrophoresis, ''Fig 1''. The figure shows that both plasmids are contained with the BL21 cells as aspected and further experiments need to carried out to discover why the sigma factor is not activating transcription of the red fluorescence protein.  
+
We then decided to confirm that both plasmids were in the BL21 cells by analysing the DNA by restriction enzyme digests and performing agarose gel electrophoresis, ''Fig 1''. The figure shows that both plasmids are contained within the BL21 cells as aspected and further experiments need to carried out to discover why the sigma factor is not activating transcription of the red fluorescence protein.  
 
[[image:Bl21 Anta + Rfp digest.jpg|thumb|left|Fig 1:Analysis of BL21 cells containing pETAntA and BBa_K1041002 plasmids compared to the DNA of the plasmids alone digested with XbaI, NdeI and no enzyme.]]
 
[[image:Bl21 Anta + Rfp digest.jpg|thumb|left|Fig 1:Analysis of BL21 cells containing pETAntA and BBa_K1041002 plasmids compared to the DNA of the plasmids alone digested with XbaI, NdeI and no enzyme.]]
  
Line 59: Line 58:
  
 
===Sequencing===
 
===Sequencing===
−
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we received back ''Fig 2,3,4'' showed the DNA is good quality as strong peaks were produced throughout analysis of the sample.   
+
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we received back ''Fig 3,4,5'' showed the DNA is good quality as strong peaks were produced throughout analysis of the sample.   
  
−
[[image:K1041002 1.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 2:K1041002 sequencing data part 1]]
+
[[image:K1041002 1.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 3:K1041002 sequencing data part 1]]
−
[[image:K1041002 2.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 3:K1041002 sequencing data part 2]]
+
[[image:K1041002 2.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 4:K1041002 sequencing data part 2]]
−
[[image:K1041002 3.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 4:K1041002 sequencing data part 3]]
+
[[image:K1041002 3.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 5:K1041002 sequencing data part 3]]
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 76: Line 75:
  
 
===BLAST Analysis===
 
===BLAST Analysis===
−
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''Fig 5,6''The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches.
+
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''Fig 6,7''The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches.
−
[[image:6 Fwd.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 5: Forward primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]]
+
[[image:6 Fwd.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 6: Forward primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]]
−
[[image:6 Rev.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 6: Reverse primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]]
+
[[image:6 Rev.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 7: Reverse primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]]
  
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===

Revision as of 11:37, 4 October 2013

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013

Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks BBa_K1041000 and BBa_K1041001. These biobricks both contain a Nde1 site after their promoter sequence, enabling a restriction digest to be performed. The RFP coding gene was excised from BBa_K1041000 and ligated in front of the AntG promoter of BBa_K1041001 to create a new biobrick.

Due to the major research side of our project involving actinomycetes not E.coli this part was cloned into an appropriate actinomycete-specific intergrative plasmid PMS82. This was to allow the reporter to be utilised in screening for antimycin producing actinomycetes. The plasmid containing the reporter sequence (Bba_K1041002)was transformed into specialised E.colistrains: ET12567 and pUZ8002. These cells were then conjugated with spore stocks of actinomycetes cultivated from soil samples to transfer the active biosensor in the plasmid.

One further experiment was designed to activate the RFP gene by transforming BBa_K1041002 into a BL21 E.Coli strain along with the plasmid pET28AntA which synthesises the sigma factor AntA. It was hoped that with both plasmids in the same cell, the AntA sigma factor would be produced and activate transcription of the RFP gene by binding to the promoter sequence antGP. This would mean that the cells could be spread onto agar plates containing Chlorophenicol and the colonies would appear red under natural light. Unfortunately the colonies did not appear red. We then decided to confirm that both plasmids were in the BL21 cells by analysing the DNA by restriction enzyme digests and performing agarose gel electrophoresis, Fig 1. The figure shows that both plasmids are contained within the BL21 cells as aspected and further experiments need to carried out to discover why the sigma factor is not activating transcription of the red fluorescence protein.

Fig 1:Analysis of BL21 cells containing pETAntA and BBa_K1041002 plasmids compared to the DNA of the plasmids alone digested with XbaI, NdeI and no enzyme.



















Characterisation

This involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.

Restriction Digest

Part Bba_K1041002 was digested with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to uncut DNA Fig 2.The enzyme digest shows the NdeI restriction has been conserved after ligation of fragments from parts Bba_J04450 and Bba_K1041001.

Fig 2:Lane 1 contains and Bba_K1041002 cut with XbaI and NdeI and lane 2 uncut Bba_K1041002.



















Sequencing

The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we received back Fig 3,4,5 showed the DNA is good quality as strong peaks were produced throughout analysis of the sample.

Fig 3:K1041002 sequencing data part 1
Fig 4:K1041002 sequencing data part 2
Fig 5:K1041002 sequencing data part 3










BLAST Analysis

The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence Fig 6,7The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches.

Fig 6: Forward primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence
Fig 7: Reverse primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence

User Reviews

UNIQb5f95275924f4297-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQb5f95275924f4297-partinfo-00000001-QINU