Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1017404"
(→Description of function) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
the target mRNA and the ribosome can't bind the mRNA. Therefore, the translation | the target mRNA and the ribosome can't bind the mRNA. Therefore, the translation | ||
would be inhibited.</p> | would be inhibited.</p> | ||
− | [[File:Nctu_formosa_sRNA_inhibition.JPG|thumb|500px|center| | + | [[File:Nctu_formosa_sRNA_inhibition.JPG|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1. '''''']] |
===How we design=== | ===How we design=== | ||
We first picked the sRNA from a library of artificial sRNA that was constructed by fusing a randomized antisense domain of Spot42, the scaffold that is known to recruit the RNA chaperons. As we want the sRNA we picked can specifically complementary to the SD sequence which in our designed RBS(BBa_K1017202[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1017202]), we picked the one which contains a consensus sequence, 5’-CCCUC-3’. Our artificial sRNA also has three stem-loop double stranded RNA structures, and the loop closest to the 3’ terminus is complementary to a sequence preceding the initiation codon of mRNA, so that it can prevent the ribosome from binding to the initiation condon, so the translation would be repressed. | We first picked the sRNA from a library of artificial sRNA that was constructed by fusing a randomized antisense domain of Spot42, the scaffold that is known to recruit the RNA chaperons. As we want the sRNA we picked can specifically complementary to the SD sequence which in our designed RBS(BBa_K1017202[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1017202]), we picked the one which contains a consensus sequence, 5’-CCCUC-3’. Our artificial sRNA also has three stem-loop double stranded RNA structures, and the loop closest to the 3’ terminus is complementary to a sequence preceding the initiation codon of mRNA, so that it can prevent the ribosome from binding to the initiation condon, so the translation would be repressed. | ||
− | [[File:NCTU sRNA-2 structure predict.png|center]] | + | [[File:NCTU sRNA-2 structure predict.png|thumb|600px|center|Figure 2. '''''']] |
===Effect on E. Coli Growth=== | ===Effect on E. Coli Growth=== | ||
To test whether or not our sRNA would effect the growth of E. Coli, we compared the growth of E. Coli with PSB1C3 (without RFP) and the E. Coli growth with Pcons + sRNA. It can be observed from the following figure that the resultant growth curves are similar, showing no signs of growth interference. This result proves that our sRNA regulated system can be integrated into bacteria. | To test whether or not our sRNA would effect the growth of E. Coli, we compared the growth of E. Coli with PSB1C3 (without RFP) and the E. Coli growth with Pcons + sRNA. It can be observed from the following figure that the resultant growth curves are similar, showing no signs of growth interference. This result proves that our sRNA regulated system can be integrated into bacteria. | ||
− | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_growth.JPG| | + | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_growth.JPG|thumb|600px|center|Figure 3.'''The growth curve of the E. Coli with sRNA shows uninterrupted growth curve that is similar to the growth curve of the E. Coli with PSB1C3.''']] |
− | that is similar to the growth curve of the E. Coli with PSB1C3.]] | + | |
Then, We employed the following biobricks to test the regulation efficiency of the sRNA we designed : | Then, We employed the following biobricks to test the regulation efficiency of the sRNA we designed : | ||
− | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_regulation_biobrick.png| | + | |
+ | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_regulation_biobrick.png|thumb|600px|center|Figure 4.'''The biobrick of testing the sRNA.''']] | ||
+ | |||
From the following figure, it can be observed that sRNA can regulate RFP expression. The bacterial colonies without sRNA are red, showing high RFP expression. The bacterial colonies with sRNA, however, are white, suggesting that sRNA has regulated the RFP expression by base pairing to rRBS. The normalized expression without sRNA must be much higher than the expression with sRNA, or else we would not be able to easily distinguish the difference in RFP expression through the colors of the colonies. | From the following figure, it can be observed that sRNA can regulate RFP expression. The bacterial colonies without sRNA are red, showing high RFP expression. The bacterial colonies with sRNA, however, are white, suggesting that sRNA has regulated the RFP expression by base pairing to rRBS. The normalized expression without sRNA must be much higher than the expression with sRNA, or else we would not be able to easily distinguish the difference in RFP expression through the colors of the colonies. | ||
− | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_regulation_plate.JPG| | + | |
+ | [[File:NCTU_sRNA_regulation_plate.JPG|thumb|600px|center|Figure 5.'''The bacterial colonies with sRNA shows no clear sign of RFP expression, while the colonies without sRNA do.''']] | ||
===sRNA Inhibit Efficiency=== | ===sRNA Inhibit Efficiency=== | ||
The following figure shows quantitative analysis of the sRNA regulation efficiency. Colony A illustrates a high sRNA regulation efficiency compared to colony B. The reason that causes such difference in regulation efficiency is mutation. Colony B is mutated, causing the sRNA regulated-system to malfunction, while colony A is not mutated and shows a high regulation efficiency as anticipated. | The following figure shows quantitative analysis of the sRNA regulation efficiency. Colony A illustrates a high sRNA regulation efficiency compared to colony B. The reason that causes such difference in regulation efficiency is mutation. Colony B is mutated, causing the sRNA regulated-system to malfunction, while colony A is not mutated and shows a high regulation efficiency as anticipated. | ||
− | [[file:NCTU_result_sRNA_Inhibit_Efficiency.png| | + | |
+ | [[file:NCTU_result_sRNA_Inhibit_Efficiency.png|thumb|600px|center|Figure 6.'''Colony A shows sRNA regulation with high efficiency.''']] | ||
===Acknowedgment of sources and references=== | ===Acknowedgment of sources and references=== | ||
Torsten Waldminghaus, Nadja Heidrich, Sabine Brantl and Franz Narberhaus .(2012). Engineering Artificial Small RNAs for Conditional Gene Silencing in Escherichia coli ,1: 6–13 | Torsten Waldminghaus, Nadja Heidrich, Sabine Brantl and Franz Narberhaus .(2012). Engineering Artificial Small RNAs for Conditional Gene Silencing in Escherichia coli ,1: 6–13 |
Revision as of 14:56, 30 September 2013
sRNA-2
Description of function
Small RNA is an important role on gene regulation. It will interact with the targeted mRNA by imperfect basepairing, reducing the translational efficiency and recruiting chaperones such as Hfq for translational termination.Since we choose sRNA to be part of our regulated-system, we need to prevent the sRNA from effecting undesired genes, so it is necessarily to design artificial sRNA that targets specifically to the desired genes.
The following figure depicts the mechnism of sRNA. The sRNA basepair with the target mRNA and the ribosome can't bind the mRNA. Therefore, the translation would be inhibited.
How we design
We first picked the sRNA from a library of artificial sRNA that was constructed by fusing a randomized antisense domain of Spot42, the scaffold that is known to recruit the RNA chaperons. As we want the sRNA we picked can specifically complementary to the SD sequence which in our designed RBS(BBa_K1017202[1]), we picked the one which contains a consensus sequence, 5’-CCCUC-3’. Our artificial sRNA also has three stem-loop double stranded RNA structures, and the loop closest to the 3’ terminus is complementary to a sequence preceding the initiation codon of mRNA, so that it can prevent the ribosome from binding to the initiation condon, so the translation would be repressed.
Effect on E. Coli Growth
To test whether or not our sRNA would effect the growth of E. Coli, we compared the growth of E. Coli with PSB1C3 (without RFP) and the E. Coli growth with Pcons + sRNA. It can be observed from the following figure that the resultant growth curves are similar, showing no signs of growth interference. This result proves that our sRNA regulated system can be integrated into bacteria.
Then, We employed the following biobricks to test the regulation efficiency of the sRNA we designed :
From the following figure, it can be observed that sRNA can regulate RFP expression. The bacterial colonies without sRNA are red, showing high RFP expression. The bacterial colonies with sRNA, however, are white, suggesting that sRNA has regulated the RFP expression by base pairing to rRBS. The normalized expression without sRNA must be much higher than the expression with sRNA, or else we would not be able to easily distinguish the difference in RFP expression through the colors of the colonies.
sRNA Inhibit Efficiency
The following figure shows quantitative analysis of the sRNA regulation efficiency. Colony A illustrates a high sRNA regulation efficiency compared to colony B. The reason that causes such difference in regulation efficiency is mutation. Colony B is mutated, causing the sRNA regulated-system to malfunction, while colony A is not mutated and shows a high regulation efficiency as anticipated.
Acknowedgment of sources and references
Torsten Waldminghaus, Nadja Heidrich, Sabine Brantl and Franz Narberhaus .(2012). Engineering Artificial Small RNAs for Conditional Gene Silencing in Escherichia coli ,1: 6–13 Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 3
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]