Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1074011"

(→‎References)
(→‎Usage and Biology)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
There are both positive and negative feedback loops in this process. On the one hand, SdpI is unable to sequestrate the autorepressor, SdpR, until it captures the toxin, SdpC. The accumulation of SdpC will thus facilitate SdpI to capture more SdpR and thereby relieve the repression of SdpR, stimulating the expression of itself. This is the positive feedback loop which leads to the increasing accumulation of SdpC and finally the death of the bacteria. On the other hand, the removal of SdpR also enhance the expression of SdpI and accelerate the sequestration of SdpC, which forms a negative feedback loop whose effects contradict the positive feedback loop. However, since the copy number of SdpC is much higher, it is believed that the positive loop is strong enough to outweigh the negative one, which guarantees this mechanism will finally leads to collapse instead of equilibrium.
 
There are both positive and negative feedback loops in this process. On the one hand, SdpI is unable to sequestrate the autorepressor, SdpR, until it captures the toxin, SdpC. The accumulation of SdpC will thus facilitate SdpI to capture more SdpR and thereby relieve the repression of SdpR, stimulating the expression of itself. This is the positive feedback loop which leads to the increasing accumulation of SdpC and finally the death of the bacteria. On the other hand, the removal of SdpR also enhance the expression of SdpI and accelerate the sequestration of SdpC, which forms a negative feedback loop whose effects contradict the positive feedback loop. However, since the copy number of SdpC is much higher, it is believed that the positive loop is strong enough to outweigh the negative one, which guarantees this mechanism will finally leads to collapse instead of equilibrium.
  
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/24/USTC_China_iGEM13_BBa_K1074011_1.png
  
  
−
 
+
For more details, refer to our wiki [http://2013.igem.org/Team:USTC_CHINA/Modeling/KillSwitch]
−
For more details, refer to our wiki [http://www.example.com link title]
+
  
 
===References===
 
===References===

Revision as of 18:29, 26 September 2013

PsdpRI+RBS+SDP

We construct this gene circuit as our kill switch to kill the engineered Bacillus subtilis for the safety purpose.Killing is mediated by the exported toxic protein SdpC. Extracellular SdpC induces the synthesis of an immunity protein, SdpI, which protects toxin-producing cells from being killed. SdpI, a polytopic membrane protein, is encoded by a two-gene operon under sporulation control that contains the gene for an autorepressor, SdpR. The autorepressor binds to and blocks the promoter for the operon. Evidence indicates that SdpI is also a signal-transduction protein that responds to the SdpC toxin by sequestering the SdpR autorepressor at the membrane. Sequestration relieves repression and stimulates synthesis of immunity protein. The kill switch is based on a high-copy vector fused with promoter for operon sdpIR and coding sequence for protein SdpC. When SdpC toxins are sensed, they will be captured by Immunity Protein SdpI at the membrane, enabling SdpI to sequester SdpR. As a result, repression on promoter SdpIR is released and more SdpC will be produced. Trapped in this endless loop, the SdpC producing cells fails to cope with enormous toxin SdpC and doomed after eliminating their siblings. Eventually, the group of engineered Bacillus subtilis is destroyed instead of sporulating.

Usage and Biology

We have built model to verify the validity of this part, and our experiment is still going on.

There are both positive and negative feedback loops in this process. On the one hand, SdpI is unable to sequestrate the autorepressor, SdpR, until it captures the toxin, SdpC. The accumulation of SdpC will thus facilitate SdpI to capture more SdpR and thereby relieve the repression of SdpR, stimulating the expression of itself. This is the positive feedback loop which leads to the increasing accumulation of SdpC and finally the death of the bacteria. On the other hand, the removal of SdpR also enhance the expression of SdpI and accelerate the sequestration of SdpC, which forms a negative feedback loop whose effects contradict the positive feedback loop. However, since the copy number of SdpC is much higher, it is believed that the positive loop is strong enough to outweigh the negative one, which guarantees this mechanism will finally leads to collapse instead of equilibrium.

USTC_China_iGEM13_BBa_K1074011_1.png


For more details, refer to our wiki [http://2013.igem.org/Team:USTC_CHINA/Modeling/KillSwitch]

References

Parallel pathways of repression and antirepression governing the transition to stationary phase in Bacillus subtilis AV Banse, A Chastanet, L Rahn-Lee…,PNAS ,2008


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 98
    Illegal SpeI site found at 680
    Illegal PstI site found at 2107
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 98
    Illegal SpeI site found at 680
    Illegal PstI site found at 2107
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 98
    Illegal SpeI site found at 680
    Illegal PstI site found at 2107
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 98
    Illegal SpeI site found at 680
    Illegal PstI site found at 2107
    Illegal AgeI site found at 867
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 854