Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041002:Experience"
(→BLAST Analysis) |
(→BLAST Analysis) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
===BLAST Analysis=== | ===BLAST Analysis=== | ||
− | The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''Fig 5,6'' | + | The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''Fig 5,6''The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches. |
+ | [[image:6 Fwd.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 5: Forward primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]] | ||
+ | [[image:6 Rev.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 6: Reverse primer K1041002 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence]] | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== |
Revision as of 10:59, 23 September 2013
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks BBa_K1041000 and BBa_K1041001. These biobricks both contain a Nde1 site after their promoter sequence, enabling a restriction digest to be performed. The RFP coding gene was excised from BBa_K1041000 and ligated in front of the AntG promoter of BBa_K1041001 to create a new biobrick.
Characterisation of this biobrick involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.
Restriction Digest
Part Bba_K1041002 was digested with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to uncut DNA Fig 1.
Sequencing
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we received back Fig 2,3,4 showed the DNA is good quality.
BLAST Analysis
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence Fig 5,6The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches.
User Reviews
UNIQ43271b21ba4381ec-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ43271b21ba4381ec-partinfo-00000001-QINU