Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K176000:Experience"

(→‎User Reviews)
(→‎User Reviews)
 
Line 32: Line 32:
 
USTC iGEM 2009 team’s data did not contain the inducer combination: 3OC6HSL(-) and aTc(+).
 
USTC iGEM 2009 team’s data did not contain the inducer combination: 3OC6HSL(-) and aTc(+).
  
−
In contrast, all four combinations were confirmed in our new Plux/tet hybrid promoter ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934024 BBa_K934024]).
+
In contrast, all four combinations were confirmed in our new Plux/tet hybrid promoter ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934024 BBa_K934024], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934025 BBa_K934025]).
 
|};
 
|};
  
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K176000 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K176000 EndReviews</partinfo>

Latest revision as of 03:13, 27 September 2012

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K176000

User Reviews

UNIQ65a72a38699e0ac9-partinfo-00000000-QINU

•

Tokyo-tech iGEM 2012

We improved this Plux/tet hybrid promoter parts by developing a new Plux/tet hybrid promoter (BBa_K934024).

Pluxtet assay.png

USTC iGEM 2009 team’s data did not contain the inducer combination: 3OC6HSL(-) and aTc(+).

In contrast, all four combinations were confirmed in our new Plux/tet hybrid promoter (BBa_K934024, BBa_K934025).

;

UNIQ65a72a38699e0ac9-partinfo-00000002-QINU