Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K594015:Experience"

(→‎User Reviews)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K594015 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K594015 StartReviews</partinfo>
−
<!-- Template for a user review
+
<!-- Template for a user review  
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='10%'|
 
|width='10%'|
−
<partinfo>BBa_K594015 AddReview 5</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K381001 AddReview 5</partinfo>
−
<I>DonQuixia</I>
+
<I>EliasGrimaldo</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
−
When we use the pSB1C3 for standardization, we found that the pSB1C3 have the right antibiotic resistance but a wrong DNA length. This can be clearly seen from the electrophoretogram below.
+
The part work well under cold shock stress (20°C to 30°C) of 10-12 hr.
−
|};
+
|}
 
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K594015 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K594015 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 02:04, 6 October 2011

Applications of BBa_K594015

From the beginning, we use the linearized plasmid backbone pSB1C3 in the 2011 spring DNA distribution. But the standardization with them all end up with failures.

Then, we began to seek for a new plasmid backbone. We found the K381001 in pSB1C3. If we cut the pSB1C3 with EcoR I and Pst I, we could get pSB1C3 plasmid backbone for standardization.

User Reviews

UNIQ5e3ad10ef09702dc-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ5e3ad10ef09702dc-partinfo-00000001-QINU