Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K598002"

Revision as of 10:07, 5 October 2011

Bistable Switch Mutant 68

Description

This part is one of the mutation libraries of bistable switch modifying the ribosome binding (RBS) site of cI434 gene.

The bisatble switch, which was inherited from the iGEM 2007 Peking Team, mainly consists of a positive feedback loop and a double-negative feedback loop. The expression of two mutually repressing repressors genes cI434 and cI are controlled by the promoters PR and PRM respectively. Promoter RM can be activated by CI and repressed by CI434. GFP and mRFP are placed downstream cI434 and cI as reporters of two states, respectively. In the state when CI is dominant, it can activate its own gene’s transcription and repress that of cI434, thus developing and stabilizing a stable high CI/low CI434 state, in which a red fluorescent protein (mRFP) gene co-transcripted with CI is expressed. Alternatively, when CI434 is dominant, a stable high CI434/low CI state will be established and GFP co-transcripted with CI434 is expressed to represent the this state. Each cell that bears the bistable switch is expected to express GFP or mRFP exclusively. The two states are believed to be stabilized over a long period while under certain circumstances one state may be turned over to the other.

When the bistable switch on pSB1C3 plasmid is transformed into DH5α strain, green colonies and red colonies could be observed. Interestingly, several mixed colonies could also be observed, which implied the random steady-state characteristic of the bistable switch (Figure 1). A ratiometric of the green colonies to the red colonies (G/R ratio) was calculated on the LB agar plate. We proposed that the G/R ratio is relevant to the translation strength of CI & CI434 genes, which means modulating the translation strength of one or more could result in different ratios of G/R under current architecture of bistable switch.

Figure 1 Images of colonies and individual cells bearing the genetic bistable switch. (A) A red colony and a mixed colony captured by fluorescence stereomicroscope. (B) Individual cell images in the mixed colony captured by laser confocal microscope. Each rod represents a single cell, expressing GFP or mRFP exclusively.

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

10
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
12
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
21
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
23
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
25
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
Illegal AgeI site found at 10
Illegal AgeI site found at 122
1000
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 2699

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 This part is one of the mutation libraries of bistable switch modifying the ribosome binding (RBS) site of ''cI434'' gene.
-The bisatble switch, which was inherited from the iGEM 2007 Peking Team, mainly consists of a positive feedback loop and a double-negative feedback loop. The expression of two mutually repressing repressors genes cI434 and cI are controlled by the promoters PR and PRM respectively. Promoter RM can be activated by CI and repressed by CI434. GFP and mRFP are placed downstream cI434 and cI as reporters of two states, respectively. In the state when CI is dominant, it can activate its own gene’s transcription and repress that of cI434, thus developing and stabilizing a stable high CI/low CI434 state, in which a red fluorescent protein (mRFP) gene co-transcripted with CI is expressed. Alternatively, when CI434 is dominant, a stable high CI434/low CI state will be established and GFP co-transcripted with CI434 is expressed to represent the this state. Each cell that bears the bistable switch is expected to express GFP or mRFP exclusively. The two states are believed to be stabilized over a long period while under certain circumstances one state may be turned over to the other.
+The bisatble switch, which was inherited from the iGEM 2007 Peking Team, mainly consists of a positive feedback loop and a double-negative feedback loop. The expression of two mutually repressing repressors genes cI434 and cI are controlled by the promoters PR and PRM respectively. Promoter RM can be activated by CI and repressed by CI434. GFP and mRFP are placed downstream ''cI434'' and ''cI'' as reporters of two states, respectively. In the state when CI is dominant, it can activate its own gene’s transcription and repress that of ''cI434'', thus developing and stabilizing a stable high CI/low CI434 state, in which a red fluorescent protein (mRFP) gene co-transcripted with CI is expressed. Alternatively, when CI434 is dominant, a stable high CI434/low CI state will be established and GFP co-transcripted with CI434 is expressed to represent the this state. Each cell that bears the bistable switch is expected to express GFP or mRFP exclusively. The two states are believed to be stabilized over a long period while under certain circumstances one state may be turned over to the other.
 When the bistable switch on pSB1C3 plasmid is transformed into DH5α strain, green colonies and red colonies could be observed. Interestingly, several mixed colonies could also be observed, which implied the random steady-state characteristic of the bistable switch (Figure 1). A ratiometric of the green colonies to the red colonies (G/R ratio) was calculated on the LB agar plate. We proposed that the G/R ratio is relevant to the translation strength of CI & CI434 genes, which means modulating the translation strength of one or more could result in different ratios of G/R under current architecture of bistable switch.