Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa T9002:Experience"

Line 113: Line 113:
  
 
We used this construction as a model for a GFP-based characterization method. We tried different concentrations, that turned to be too high, for it seems that the media was quite saturated.
 
We used this construction as a model for a GFP-based characterization method. We tried different concentrations, that turned to be too high, for it seems that the media was quite saturated.
 +
 +
Fluorescence                                          O.D.(600nm)
  
 
[[Image:Fluabs.png]]
 
[[Image:Fluabs.png]]
  
Fluo/Abs 0,4       0,2 0,02         0,002
+
Fluorescence/Absorbance ratio and average  of these data
20228,4264 21948,57143 23805,88235 18800
+
 
19000         22653,63128    26758,38926 18977,27273
+
87564,44444 86261,46789 110744,898 71241,17647
+
80957,98319 86795,2381 106673,4694 80901,84049
+
165823,5294 173518,3246 176240,566 124314,0097
+
155643,4783 163272,3214 180076,9231 115613,0435
+
277180,6854 311773,3333 296588,8502 255385,4545
+
258052,6316 302849,8024 343081,3953 246688,2591
+
383997,1347 443769,4915 468170,5686 382463,1579
+
429810,9091 467048         471354,0984 393853,6585
+
559641,6667 634488,1657 622699,1643 515597,8552
+
591265,4867 648454,2683 604000         510624,3094
+
536129,8405 619371,0526 591359,2965 636110,8108
+
659274,5098 630994,6381 572654,5012 557727,4882
+
  
Average 0,4 0,2      0,02         0,002
+
[[Image:Fluoabsavrg.png]]
19614,2132 22301,10136 25282,13581 18888,63636
+
84261,21382 86528,35299 108709,1837 76071,50848
+
160733,5038 168395,323 178158,7446 119963,5266
+
267616,6585 307311,5679 319835,1228 251036,8568
+
406904,0219 455408,7458 469762,3335 388158,4082
+
575453,5767 641471,217 613349,5822 513111,0823
+
597702,1752 625182,8454 582006,8988 596919,1495
+
  
Average variation of the Fluo/Abs ratio
+
Variation of the fluo/Abs ratio in time
Time (min) 0,4 0,2 0,02 0,002
+
0 0,00319797 0,001356744 0,005807343 0,006363636
+
30 64647,00382 64227,25299 83427,05367 57182,87848
+
60 141119,2938 146094,223 152876,6146 101074,8966
+
90 248002,4485 285010,4679 294552,9928 232148,2268
+
120 387289,8119 433107,6458 444480,2035 369269,7782
+
150 555839,3667 619170,117 588067,4522 494222,4523
+
180 578087,9652 602881,7454 556724,7688 578030,5195
+
  
</nowiki>
 
  
 
[[Image:GFPgraph.png]]
 
[[Image:GFPgraph.png]]

Revision as of 14:28, 1 October 2011

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_T9002

User Reviews

UNIQb2086a3844ec8341-partinfo-00000000-QINU

2009 DNA Distribution quality control

The UNIPV-Pavia iGEM team sequenced T9002 part and found that it was completely confirmed, while iGEM QC results classified it as "inconsistent". DNA was resuspended from well 9A, kit plate 2, transformed in TOP10 E. coli and amplified inoculating a single colony from the grown LB agar plate in LB medium. Finally DNA has been miniprepped from the grown culture and sent to a BMR Genomics (Padova, Italy) for sequencing.

Experimental measurements

The UNIPV-Pavia iGEM team tested T9002 BioBrick in several working conditions. Results are reported in BBa_F2620 Experience page.

The Brown iGEM team conducted tests on this part in the summer of 2007. The results are depicted in the graphs below.

AHL.JPG

The first graph indicates that until a critical point is reached, increasing AHL concentration does increase GFP output. This is most easily noticeable between the concentrations of 20 nM, after which point the amount of GFP produced by cells begins to decrease. This may be due to one of two things: AHL quenches the signal from GFP, or too much AHL disrupts the cell's functions in a way that either kills it or prevents it from making as much GFP. This second hypothesis is partially confirmed by the second graph, which shows that adding more than 20 nM AHL causes a decline in cell density. On each graph, the different colored lines represent different time points after AHL was added to the cells. They are 4 hours, 5 hours, etc.


•••••

Antiquity

This review comes from the old result system and indicates that this part worked in some test.

UNIQb2086a3844ec8341-partinfo-00000003-QINU

UNIQb2086a3844ec8341-partinfo-00000004-QINU

•••••

UNIPV-Pavia iGEM 2011

BioBrick BBa_T9002 is an HSL biosensor, which provides a non linear relationship between HSL input and Scell output. More precisely, the characteristic sigmoidal curve requires synthetic parameters for its accurate identification. These are the minimum and maximum values, the swtich point (i.e., the curve inflection point), and the upper and lower boundaries of linearity. This biosensor revealed greatly reliable, providing measurement repeatability and minimal experimental noise. Referring to its activation formula, the calibration curve is shown below.


Minimum [Scell] Maximum [Scell] Switch point [nM] Lower boundary of linearity [nM] Upper boundary of linearity [nM]
17.31 739.4 1.39 0.38 5.07


In order to determine the threshold sensitivity of T9002 biosensor, experiments were performed with several HSL inductions minimally interspaced in the region of low detectability. Hypothesizing that the inducer is 1:20 diluted (as for all of our tests), the minimum detectable HSL concentration is 3 nM.


This biosensor was used to measure HSL concentration for parts producing or degrading this signalling molecule. For each of these experiments, a calibration curve of the biosensor was built, inducing it with known HSL concentrations, evaluating for each of them the Scell signal and finally estimating the Hill curve parameters. Once identified the parameters, the unknown concentration of a sample can be evaluated from its Scell (provided that it has a value included in the linear zone of the biosensor), as shown below:

It is necessary, then, to multiply the measurement for the dilution factor used (in our experiments it was 20).

••

Sevilla 2011

We used this construction as a model for a GFP-based characterization method. We tried different concentrations, that turned to be too high, for it seems that the media was quite saturated.

Fluorescence O.D.(600nm)

Fluabs.png

Fluorescence/Absorbance ratio and average of these data


Fluoabsavrg.png

Variation of the fluo/Abs ratio in time


GFPgraph.png


UNIQb2086a3844ec8341-partinfo-0000000A-QINU