Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K525222"
(→Identification and localisation) |
JSchwarzhans (Talk | contribs) (→Expression in E. coli) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
The mRFP|CspB fusion protein was overexpressed in E. coli KRX after induction of T7 polymerase by supplementation of 0,1 % L-rhamnose using the [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols/Downstream-processing#Expression_of_S-layer_genes_in_E._coli autinduction protocol] from promega. | The mRFP|CspB fusion protein was overexpressed in E. coli KRX after induction of T7 polymerase by supplementation of 0,1 % L-rhamnose using the [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols/Downstream-processing#Expression_of_S-layer_genes_in_E._coli autinduction protocol] from promega. | ||
− | [[Image:Bielefeld_2011_CH2_Growthcurve.png|600px|center|thumb| '''Figure 1: Growthcurve of ''E. coli'' KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion.''']] | + | [[Image:Bielefeld_2011_CH2_Growthcurve.png|600px|center|thumb| '''Figure 1: Growthcurve of ''E. coli'' KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction, cultivated at 37 °C in autoinduction medium with, respectively, without inductor. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion. After induction at approximately 6 h the OD<sub>600</sub> of the induced K525222 visibly drops when compared to the uninduced culture. Both cultures grow significantly slower than KRX wildtype.''']] |
− | [[Image:Bielefeld_2011_CH2_RFU_OD.png|600px|center|thumb| '''Figure 2: RFU to OD<sub>600</sub> ratio of ''E. coli'' KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion.''']] | + | [[Image:Bielefeld_2011_CH2_RFU_OD.png|600px|center|thumb| '''Figure 2: RFU to OD<sub>600</sub> ratio of ''E. coli'' KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion. After induction at approximately 6 h the RFU to OD<sub>600</sub> ratio starts to rise in the induced culture. Compared to the uninduced culture the ratio is roughly five times higher. Most likely due to basal transcription the RFU to OD<sub>600</sub> ratio of the uninduced culture starts to rise after 12 hours. The KRX wildtype shows no variation in the RFU to OD<sub>600</sub> ratio.''']] |
===Identification and localisation=== | ===Identification and localisation=== |
Revision as of 23:27, 21 September 2011
S-layer cspB from Corynebacterium halotolerans
S-layers (crystalline bacterial surface layer) are crystal-like layers consisting of multiple protein monomers and can be found in various (archae-)bacteria. They constitute the outermost part of the cell wall. Especially their ability for self-assembly into distinct geometries is of scientific interest. At phase boundaries, in solutions and on a variety of surfaces they form different lattice structures. The geometry and arrangement is determined by the C-terminal self assembly-domain, which is specific for each S-layer protein. The most common lattice geometries are oblique, square and hexagonal. By modifying the characteristics of the S-layer through combination with functional groups and protein domains as well as their defined position and orientation to eachother (determined by the S-layer geometry) it is possible to realize various practical applications ([http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00573.x/full Sleytr et al., 2007]).
Usage and Biology
S-layer proteins can be used as scaffold for nanobiotechnological applications and devices by e.g. fusing the S-layer's self-assembly domain to other functional protein domains. It is possible to coat surfaces and liposomes with S-layers. A big advantage of S-layers: after expressing in E. coli and purification, the nanobiotechnological system is cell-free. This enhances the biological security of a device.
Important parameters
Experiment | Characteristic | Result |
---|---|---|
Expression (E. coli) | Localisation | Cell membrane |
Compatibility | E. coli KRX | |
Induction of expression | L-rhamnose for induction of T7 polymerase | |
Specific growth rate (un-/induced) | 0.245 h-1 / 0.109 h-1 | |
Doubling time (un-/induced) | 2.83 h / 6.33 h |
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1103
Illegal XhoI site found at 559 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 226
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1315
Illegal AgeI site found at 217
Illegal AgeI site found at 458
Illegal AgeI site found at 505 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 907
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 214
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 592
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 994
Expression in E. coli
The CspB gen was fused with a monomeric RFP (BBa_E1010) using [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols#Gibson_assembly Gibson assembly] for characterization.
The mRFP|CspB fusion protein was overexpressed in E. coli KRX after induction of T7 polymerase by supplementation of 0,1 % L-rhamnose using the [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols/Downstream-processing#Expression_of_S-layer_genes_in_E._coli autinduction protocol] from promega.
Identification and localisation
After a cultivation time of 18 h the mRFP|CspB fusion protein has to be localized in E. coli KRX. Therefor a part of the produced biomass was mechanically disrupted and the resulting lysate was wahed with ddH2O. Then the lysate was treted with ionic, nonionic and zwitterionic detergents to release the CspB|mRFP out of the membranes, if it intigrates. From the other part of the cells the periplasm was detached by using a osmotic shock.
The fluorescence in all cultivation fractions plus the fluorescence in the lysis und wash fraction shows that the fusion protein is water soluble and sediment not during centrifugation. Together with the absence of flourescence in the detergent fractions verifies that the fusion protein is not integrated into the cell membrane (fig. 3) and is not present as inclusion body.
In comparison with the mRFP fusion protein of ???, wich has a lipid anchor, a minor relative fluorescence per OD600 in all cultivation and detergent fractions was detected (fig. 3). Together with the decreasing RFU/OD600 after 14 h of cultivation (fig. 2) indicates this rusult a postive effect of the lipid anchor on the protein stability.