Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K584000"

Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K584000 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K584000 short</partinfo>
 
This part was designed to test the functionality of the promotor region.
 
  
 
<u><b>Characterization</b></u>
 
<u><b>Characterization</b></u>
<p align="justify">To test the usefulness of the arabinose-inducible promoter I13453 in our 2011 iGEM project, we fused the promoter to a GFP reporter, and assayed the promoter’s activity after addition of different amounts of arabinose. We tested this activity both in a TOP10F’ (Figure 1) as well as a MG1655 (Figure 2) E.coli strain background. For more information on E.coli strain descriptions, we recommend the following web site: [http://openwetware.org/wiki/E._coli_genotypes E.Coli_Genotypes].</p>
 
 
[[Image:pBAD_TOP10.jpg|thumb|center|Figure1]]
 
 
 
<p align="justify">As can be seen in Figure 1, addition of arabinose had only minor, if any, effect on the growth of TOP10F’ cells, most likely because these cells cannot metabolize the sugar. However, to our surprise, we did not observe an arabinose-induced increase of fluorescence compared to the control without arabinose for the first 6 hours. The observed increase in fluorescence after arabinose addition at the 8 hour time point could not be confirmed when the experiment was repeated.</p>
 
 
[[Image:pBAD_MG1655.jpg|thumb|center|Figure2]]
 
 
 
<p align="justify">Figure 2 demonstrates that in MG1655 cells, the addition of 0.2% and 2% arabinose results in a growth defect after about 4 hours of growth, which may relate to the metabolism of the sugar in this strain. In contrast to the TOP10F’ cells, we see a clear induction of promoter activity after addition of arabinose. The addition of only 0.02% resulted in the greatest induction. Increasing arabinose concentration did not increase fluorescence, probably due to the observed growth defect. </p>
 
 
 
<p align="justify">As an additional control, we checked the activity of a constitutive promoter under the same conditions as described here. For results on these experiments, check out our [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K584001 BBa_K584001] page.</p>
 
  
 +
<p align="justify"><b>The [http://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven K.U.Leuven 2011 iGEM Team] has <u>extensively characterized</u></b> the <b><u>existing Biobrick part</u></b> [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_I13453 PBad promoter(BBa_I13453)]</p>
  
 +
The detailed qualitative and quantitative <b>[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I13453:Experience#User_Reviews review]</b> has been added into the experience page of the BBa_I13453 PBad promoter biobrick.
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here

Revision as of 08:53, 21 September 2011

pBAD + GFP generator

Characterization

The [http://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven K.U.Leuven 2011 iGEM Team] has extensively characterized the existing Biobrick part PBad promoter(BBa_I13453)

The detailed qualitative and quantitative review has been added into the experience page of the BBa_I13453 PBad promoter biobrick.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 125
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 65
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 801