Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K515102:Experience"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<p><b>Characterisation</b></p> | <p><b>Characterisation</b></p> | ||
| − | <p>This part (BBa K515102) has been characterised qualitatively and quantitatively for chemotactic response towards L (-) malic acid. The tests were performed across a range of different attractant concentrations to observe optimal functioning of the part. Qualitative tests were performed using semi solid agar assays, quantitative analysis was performed using high - throughput capillary assay with cell count for each capillary evaluated using FACS. Behavioral analysis of E. coli expressing this part was done using Wide - field microscopy, and manual tracking was used to evaluate tactic response.</p> | + | <p>This part (BBa K515102) has been characterised qualitatively and quantitatively for chemotactic response towards L (-) malic acid. The tests were performed across a range of different attractant concentrations to observe optimal functioning of the part. Qualitative tests were performed using semi solid agar assays, quantitative analysis was performed using high - throughput capillary assay with cell count for each capillary evaluated using FACS. Behavioral analysis of E. coli expressing this part was done using Wide - field microscopy, and manual tracking was used to evaluate tactic response. Negative control used was <i>E. coli 5α strain</i> with a selectable marker for ampicillin and kanamycin. As positive control chemotactic response of <i>E. coli 5α strain</i> to attractant L (-) serine was tested, as serine is compatible with endogenous chemotaxis system of <i>E. coli 5α strain</i>. </p> |
| + | <p><b>Qualitative assay</b></p> | ||
| + | |||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K515102 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K515102 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 10 September 2011
Characterisation
This part (BBa K515102) has been characterised qualitatively and quantitatively for chemotactic response towards L (-) malic acid. The tests were performed across a range of different attractant concentrations to observe optimal functioning of the part. Qualitative tests were performed using semi solid agar assays, quantitative analysis was performed using high - throughput capillary assay with cell count for each capillary evaluated using FACS. Behavioral analysis of E. coli expressing this part was done using Wide - field microscopy, and manual tracking was used to evaluate tactic response. Negative control used was E. coli 5α strain with a selectable marker for ampicillin and kanamycin. As positive control chemotactic response of E. coli 5α strain to attractant L (-) serine was tested, as serine is compatible with endogenous chemotaxis system of E. coli 5α strain.
Qualitative assay
User Reviews
UNIQ87c16e65fa53bfda-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ87c16e65fa53bfda-partinfo-00000001-QINU