Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K404158"
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
This part is a linker, it can be used to connect two parts and add additional space between them. That can be necessary to avoid interactions between these parts.<br> | This part is a linker, it can be used to connect two parts and add additional space between them. That can be necessary to avoid interactions between these parts.<br> | ||
<h2>Capsid</h2> (BBa_K404006)<br> | <h2>Capsid</h2> (BBa_K404006)<br> | ||
− | The AAV capsid consists of 60 capsid protein subunits. The three cap proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 are encoded in an overlapping reading frame. Arranged in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1:10, they form an icosahedral symmetry. The mRNA encoding for the cap proteins is transcribed from p40 and alternative spliced to minor and major products. Alternative splicing and translation initiation of VP2 at a nonconventional ACG initiation codon promote the expression of VP1, VP2 and VP3. The VP proteins share a common C terminus and stop codon, but begin with a different start codon. The N | + | The AAV capsid consists of 60 capsid protein subunits. The three cap proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 are encoded in an overlapping reading frame. Arranged in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1:10, they form an icosahedral symmetry. The mRNA encoding for the cap proteins is transcribed from p40 and alternative spliced to minor and major products. Alternative splicing and translation initiation of VP2 at a nonconventional ACG initiation codon promote the expression of VP1, VP2 and VP3. The VP proteins share a common C terminus and stop codon, but begin with a different start codon. The N-terminus of VP1 plays important role in infection and contains a motif highly homologous to a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) domain and nuclear localization signals (BR)(+). VP2 contains basic regions, too. |
<html><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/a7/Freiburg10_Cap_proteins_VP1_2%263.png" width="600" height="auto"/></center></html><br> | <html><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/a7/Freiburg10_Cap_proteins_VP1_2%263.png" width="600" height="auto"/></center></html><br> | ||
<h2>ViralBrick 587-KO empty</h2> | <h2>ViralBrick 587-KO empty</h2> |
Revision as of 16:19, 31 October 2010
pCMV_Z-EGFR-1907_SEG-Linker_[AAV2]-VP23 (ViralBrick-587KO-Empty)
pCMV_Z-EGFR-1907_SEG-Linker_AAV2-VP23(ViralBrick-587KO-Empty) | |
---|---|
BioBrick Nr. | BBa_K404158 |
RFC standard | RFC 10 |
Requirement | pSB1C3 |
Source | |
Submitted by | [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Freiburg_Bioware FreiGEM 2010] |
This part is used for cotranfection with parts containing VP1up (BBa_K404164-BBa_K404166)
Affibody Z-EGFR-1907
(BBa_K404302)Affibodies are small (6 kDa), soluble high-affinity proteins. They are derived from the IgG-binding B domain of the Staphylococcal protein A, which was engineered to specifically bind to certain peptides or proteins. This so-called Z domain consists of an antiparallel three-helix bundle and is advantageous due to its proteolytic and thermodynamic stability, its good folding properties and the ease of production via recombinant bacteria (Nord et al., 1997). Affibodies can be used for example for tumor targeting (Wikman et al., 2004) and diagnostic imaging applications (Orlova et al., 2006; Orlova et al., 2007). The ZEGFR:1907 Affibody was engineered to specifically bind the EGF receptor with an affinity determined to be KD = 2.8 nM (Friedman et al., 2008).
The EGF receptor is overexpressed in certain types of tumors, e.g. in breast (Walker & Dearing, 1999), lung (Hirsch et al., 2003) and bladder (Colquhoun & Mellon, 2002) carcinomas, and is therefore a suitable target for cancer imaging or therapeutic applications. Because of their good tumor uptake, and their property to become internalized into the target cells with an efficiency of 19 – 24% within one hour – compared to 45% of the natural ligand EGF - the ZEGFR:1907 Affibody was chosen for therapeutic applications by the Freiburg iGEM Team 2010 (Friedman et al., 2008; Göstring et al., 2010).
CMV
CMV promoter is derived from human Cytomegalovirus, which belongs to Herpesvirus group. All family members share the ability to remain in latent stage in the human body. CMV is located upstream of immediate-early gene. However, CMV promoter is an example of widely used promoters and is present in mammalian expression vectors. The advantage of CMV is the high-level constitutive expression in mostly all human tissues [Fitzsimons et al., 2002].
SEG Linker
(BBa_K404300)This part is a linker, it can be used to connect two parts and add additional space between them. That can be necessary to avoid interactions between these parts.
Capsid
(BBa_K404006)The AAV capsid consists of 60 capsid protein subunits. The three cap proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 are encoded in an overlapping reading frame. Arranged in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1:10, they form an icosahedral symmetry. The mRNA encoding for the cap proteins is transcribed from p40 and alternative spliced to minor and major products. Alternative splicing and translation initiation of VP2 at a nonconventional ACG initiation codon promote the expression of VP1, VP2 and VP3. The VP proteins share a common C terminus and stop codon, but begin with a different start codon. The N-terminus of VP1 plays important role in infection and contains a motif highly homologous to a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) domain and nuclear localization signals (BR)(+). VP2 contains basic regions, too.
ViralBrick 587-KO empty
The primary receptor of AAV-2 is the heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) receptor (Perabo et al. 2006). Its binding motif consists of five amino-acids located on the capsid surface: R484/R487, K532, R585/587. (Trepel et al. 2009). The positively charged arginine residues interact with the HSPGs' negatively charged acid residues. Opie et al. have shown that two point mutations (R585A and R588A) are sufficient to eliminate the heparin binding affinity in AAV2. (Opie et al. 2003). This ViralBrick has been created to introduce this knockout into other constructs. The biobricks with containing this knockout are annotated with „HSPG-ko“.
Characterization
Transduction Efficacy by Flow Cytometry
For determination of transduction efficacy flow cytometry analysis was conducted. 250.000 AAV-293 cells were transfected with 1 µg total DNA. 72 hours post transfection viruses were harvested and two different cell lines, HT1080 and A431, were transduced with 1 mL virus stock. By encapsulating mVenus coding sequence, the amount of transduced cells could be determined via flow cytometry.
Figure 1 overviews transduction efficacy of all ratio combinations.
Figure 1: Flow cytometry analysis. Transduced and therefore mVenus positive HT1080 and A431 cells, infected with virus particles consisting of different ratios of VP2 fusion construct in respect to Rep/Cap plasmid.
Transduction of HT1080 cells revealed that all viral particles remained infectious with efficacies up to 55 %. In general the amount of mVenus positive cells decreased only slightly when harboring more modified VP2 subunits. This indicates that larger peptides could be inserted into the AAV2 capsids without affecting virus assembly and packaging. A431 cells, which overexpress EGF receptor, were generally transduced with reduced efficacy.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 2279
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 665
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 2805
Illegal SapI site found at 1716
References
Mellon. 2002. Epidermal growth factor receptor and bladder cancer.Postgraduate
medical journal78, no. 924 (October): 584-9.
doi:10.1136/pmj.78.924.584.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1742539&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
Friedman,
Mikaela, Anna
Orlova, Eva Johansson, Tove L J Eriksson, Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg,
Vladimir
Tolmachev, Fredrik Y Nilsson, and Stefan Ståhl. 2008. Directed
evolution to low
nanomolar affinity of a tumor-targeting epidermal growth factor
receptor-binding affibody molecule. Journal of molecular
biology376,
no. 5: 1388-402. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.060.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18207161.
Göstring,
Lovisa, Ming Tsuey
Chew, Anna Orlova, Ingmarie Höidén-guthenberg, Anders Wennborg, Jörgen
Carlsson, and Fredrik Y Frejd. 2010. Quantification of internalization
of
EGFR-binding Affibody molecules: Methodological aspects. International
Journal of Oncology 36, no. 4 (March): 757-763.
doi:10.3892/ijo_00000551.
http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/36/4/757.
Hirsch,Fred R, Marileila Varella-Garcia, Paul a Bunn, Michael V Di Maria, Robert Veve, Roy M Bremmes,
Anna E Barón, Chan Zeng, and Wilbur a Franklin. 2003. Epidermal growth factor
receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
21, no. 20 (October): 3798-807. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.11.069.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12953099.
Nord, K, E Gunneriusson, J Ringdahl, S Ståhl, M Uhlén, and P A Nygren. 1997. Binding proteins selected from combinatorial libraries of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain. Nature biotechnology 15, no. 8 (August): 772-7. doi:10.1038/nbt0897-772. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9255793.
Orlova,
Anna, Vladimir
Tolmachev, Rikard Pehrson, Malin Lindborg, Thuy Tran, Mattias
Sandström,
Fredrik Y Nilsson, Anders Wennborg, Lars Abrahmsén, and Joachim
Feldwisch.
2007. Synthetic affibody molecules: a novel class of affinity ligands
for
molecular imaging of HER2-expressing malignant tumors. Cancer
research
67, no. 5 (March): 2178-86. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2887.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17332348.
Walker,
R a, and S J Dearing.
1999. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein
in
primary breast carcinomas. Breast cancer research and
treatment53, no.
2 (January): 167-76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10326794.
Wikman,
M, a-C Steffen, E
Gunneriusson, V Tolmachev, G P Adams, J Carlsson, and S Ståhl. 2004.
Selection
and characterization of HER2/neu-binding affibody ligands. Protein
engineering, design & selection : PEDS 17, no. 5
(May): 455-62.
doi:10.1093/protein/gzh053. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15208403.