Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5246046"

(Part assembly)
(Part assembly)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
All of the proteins composing this system are responsible for polysaccharide polymerization and export. Since the system's proteins are found in the membrane, we concluded that using a low-copy plasmid would decrease the probability of inclusion body formation. Their formation would diminish the functionality of our system, as the proteins would not allow the polysaccharide to be exported outside the bacteria.
 
All of the proteins composing this system are responsible for polysaccharide polymerization and export. Since the system's proteins are found in the membrane, we concluded that using a low-copy plasmid would decrease the probability of inclusion body formation. Their formation would diminish the functionality of our system, as the proteins would not allow the polysaccharide to be exported outside the bacteria.
  
We had to assemble this part to further create the holdfast synthesis pathway in <i> E. coli </i> together with composite part: <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246043" target="_blank">BBa_K52460463</a></html>, we had to assemble this part first into a backbone of pACYC-Duet-1. We designed a strategy to maximize the success of plasmid assembly by first assembling plasmids with 3 genes (part:<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246045" target="_blank">BBa_K5246045</a></html>) and, after verifying the sequences, integrating 3 left genes (part:<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246044" target="_blank">BBa_K5246044</a></html>) into that backbone (Fig. 1). In this way, we prevented Golden Gate assembly errors by trying to construct plasmids from 8 or more fragments.
+
We had to assemble this part to further create the holdfast synthesis pathway in <i> E. coli </i> together with composite part: <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246043" target="_blank">BBa_K52460463</a></html>, we had to assemble this part first into a backbone of pACYC-Duet-1. We designed a strategy to maximize the success of plasmid assembly by first assembling plasmids with 3 genes (part:<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246044" target="_blank">BBa_K5246044</a></html>) and, after verifying the sequences, integrating 3 left genes (part:<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246045" target="_blank">BBa_K5246045</a></html>) into that backbone (Fig. 2). In this way, we prevented Golden Gate assembly errors by trying to construct plasmids from 8 or more fragments.
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 48: Line 48:
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/golden-gate-strategy-for-holdfast-synthesis-cloning.webp" style="width:500px;">
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/golden-gate-strategy-for-holdfast-synthesis-cloning.webp" style="width:500px;">
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 1. </b> Plasmid construction strategy. Plasmids are constructed in two rounds, cloning 3 genes at a time. Verified by colony PCR, restriction digestion analysis, and Nanopore sequencing </center></figcaption>
+
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 2. </b> Plasmid construction strategy. Plasmids are constructed in two rounds, cloning 3 genes at a time. Verified by colony PCR, restriction digestion analysis, and Nanopore sequencing </center></figcaption>
 
       </figure>
 
       </figure>
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
  
The <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246045" target="_blank">BBa_K52460465</a></html> assembly was done using Golden Gate assembly with IIS AarI restriction enzyme sites introduced during PCR amplification. The backbone of pACYC-Duet-1 (Novagen) and fragments were amplified using Phusion Plus DNA polymerase, as the genome of <i> C. crescentus </i> has a high GC% content making the appearance of non-specific products during PCR amplification more common and primer design more challenging (Fig. 2). Since hfsA gene had an AarI RE site directly in the gene, this site was domesticated during side directed mutagenesis.
+
The <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246044" target="_blank">BBa_K5246044</a></html> assembly was done using Golden Gate assembly with IIS AarI restriction enzyme sites introduced during PCR amplification. The backbone of pACYC-Duet-1 (Novagen) and fragments were amplified using Phusion Plus DNA polymerase, as the genome of <i> C. crescentus </i> has a high GC% content making the appearance of non-specific products during PCR amplification more common and primer design more challenging (Fig. 3). Since hfsA gene had an AarI RE site directly in the gene, this site was domesticated during side directed mutagenesis.
  
  
Line 61: Line 61:
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/pcr-from-genome-cb2.webp" style="width:350px;">
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/pcr-from-genome-cb2.webp" style="width:350px;">
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 2. </b> PCR amplification of target genes from the genome after purification  of C. crescentus CB2 </center></figcaption>
+
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 3. </b> PCR amplification of target genes from the genome after purification  of C. crescentus CB2 </center></figcaption>
 
       </figure>
 
       </figure>
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
Due to the high amount of non-specific products, the fragments were gel-purified. Vectors and fragments composing this operon were mixed in equimolar amounts with GG reaction components and incubated as described in the <html><a href=" https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania/experiments/" target="_blank">protocol</a>. The reaction was later transformed into <i>E. coli</i> Mach1 (Thermo Scientific) competent cells. The assembly was then confirmed with restriction digest analysis (Fig. 3), and positive colonies were sequenced.  
+
Due to the high amount of non-specific products, the fragments were gel-purified. Vectors and fragments composing this operon were mixed in equimolar amounts with GG reaction components and incubated as described in the <html><a href=" https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania/experiments/" target="_blank">protocol</a>. The reaction was later transformed into <i>E. coli</i> Mach1 (Thermo Scientific) competent cells. The assembly was then confirmed with restriction digest analysis (Fig. 4), and positive colonies were sequenced.  
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 72: Line 72:
 
           <img src=" https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/slide-restriction-digestion/cb2-partial-export-apparatus-restriction-digestion.webp " style="width:350px;">
 
           <img src=" https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/slide-restriction-digestion/cb2-partial-export-apparatus-restriction-digestion.webp " style="width:350px;">
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 3. </b> Restriction digest analysis of <i> C. crescentus </i> CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI and ScaI, on the right - digested plasmids - 1-6 colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific)  </center></figcaption>
+
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 4. </b> Restriction digest analysis of <i> C. crescentus </i> CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI and ScaI, on the right - digested plasmids - 1-6 colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific)  </center></figcaption>
 
       </figure>
 
       </figure>
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
After acquiring sequence-verified clones, we further cloned the 3 remaining genes: <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246006" target="_blank">hfsF</a></html>,<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246003" target="_blank">hfsC</a></html>, <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246009" target="_blank">hfsI</a></html>, this was done the same way as the first 3 genes. After transformation into <I> E. coli </i>, obtained colonies were once again screened with cPCR (Fig. 4) and restriction digestion analysis (Fig. 5). After choosing positive colonies full plasmids with hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI were once again sequenced.
+
After acquiring sequence-verified clones, we further cloned the 3 remaining genes: <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246006" target="_blank">hfsF</a></html>,<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246003" target="_blank">hfsC</a></html>, <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5246009" target="_blank">hfsI</a></html>, this was done the same way as the first 3 genes. After transformation into <I> E. coli </i>, obtained colonies were once again screened with cPCR (Fig. 5) and restriction digestion analysis (Fig. 6). After choosing positive colonies full plasmids with hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI were once again sequenced.
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 83: Line 83:
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/cpcr-slide/cb2-full-export-apparatus-cpcr.webp" style="width:350px;">
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/cpcr-slide/cb2-full-export-apparatus-cpcr.webp" style="width:350px;">
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 4. </b> cPCR of C. crescentus CB2 hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsC-hfsI Golden Gate assembly into pACYC-Duet-1. Expected product length - ~1.5kb. -C - negative control, 1-15 - different colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific).
+
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 5. </b> cPCR of C. crescentus CB2 hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsC-hfsI Golden Gate assembly into pACYC-Duet-1. Expected product length - ~1.5kb. -C - negative control, 1-15 - different colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific).
 
</center></figcaption>
 
</center></figcaption>
 
       </figure>
 
       </figure>
Line 92: Line 92:
 
         <div class="center">
 
         <div class="center">
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/slide-restriction-digestion/cb2-full-export-apparatus-restriction-digestion.webp" style="width:350px;">
 
           <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/creation-of-an-efficient-vector-system-for-holdfast-production-in-e-coli/slide-restriction-digestion/cb2-full-export-apparatus-restriction-digestion.webp" style="width:350px;">
         </div>
+
         </div
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 5. </b> Restriction digest analysis of C. crescentus CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI, HindIII and XhoI, on the right - digested plasmids - 5,8,10,12,13 positive cPCR colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific). </center></figcaption>
+
         <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 6. </b> Restriction digest analysis of C. crescentus CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI, HindIII and XhoI, on the right - digested plasmids - 5,8,10,12,13 positive cPCR colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific). </center></figcaption>
 
       </figure>
 
       </figure>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 14:34, 29 September 2024


Caulobacter crescentus CB2/CB2A HfsA-HfsB-HfsD-HfsF-HfsC-HfsI Polysaccharide export apparatus


Introduction

Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project Synhesion aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - C. crescentus and H. baltica - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars, anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used E. coli bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel E. coli strain for more efficient production of adhesives.

This is the complete holdfast polymerization and export apparatus. Parts of this composite can be found:BBa_K5246044 and BBa_K5246045.

This part was used in Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project "Synhesion" https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania/.

Biology and Usage

Biology

Caulobacter crescentus is a common freshwater gram-negative oligotrophic bacterium of the clade Caulobacterales. Its distinguishing feature is its dual lifestyle. Initially, C. crescentus daughter cells are in a “swarmer” cell phase, which has a flagellum, enabling them to perform chemotaxis. After the motile phase, they differentiate into “stalked” cells. This phase features a tubular stalk with an adhesive structure called a holdfast, allowing them to adhere to surfaces and perform cell division. [1][2]

Caulobacterales synthesize a polysaccharide-based adhesin known as holdfast at one of their cell poles, enabling tight attachment to external surfaces. It is established that holdfast consists of repeating identical units composed of multiple monomers. Current literature agrees that in Caulobacter crescentus, these units form tetrads composed of glucose, an unidentified monosaccharide (either N-mannosamine uronic acid or xylose), N-acetylglucosamine, and N-glucosamine. These units are polymerized and exported to the outer membrane of the cell, where they function as anchors, securing the bacterium to a surface[3][4]. The C. crescentus holdfast is produced via a polysaccharide synthesis and export pathway similar to the group I capsular polysaccharide synthesis Wzy/Wzx-dependent pathway in Escherichia coli. The holdfast synthesis (hfs) genes include those encoding predicted glycosyltransferases, carbohydrate modification factors, and components of a wzy-type polysaccharide assembly pathway. [4][5][6] The synthesis of holdfast polysaccharides (Fig.1) occurs through a mechanism analogous to the Wzx/Wzy-dependent group I capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis pathway observed in Escherichia coli. The process is initiated in the cytoplasm by the glycosyltransferase (1) HfsE, which transfers an activated glucose-phosphate from UDP to an undecaprenyl-phosphate (Und-P) lipid carrier (1) [7]. Subsequent monosaccharide residues are added to the lipid carrier to form a repeating unit by the action of three glycosyltransferases: (2) HfsJ (adding N-mannosamine uronic acid or D-xylose), (3) hfsG (adds N-acetylglucosamine) and (4) HfsL (most likely adding another N-acetylglucosamine) [8]. Then some of the N-acetyl-D-glucosamine within these repeat units undergoes enzymatic modification through the activity of the deacetylases (5) HfsH and HfsK, which “incorporates” into the tetrad of another saccharide - D-glucosamine [9]. The completed repeat of four monomers is then flipped over the inner membrane to the periplasm by flippase HfsF (6) [8]. In the periplasm, the repeat unit is transferred to copolymerases HfsC and HfsI (7), which assemble holdfast into a mature polysaccharide [10]. Subsequently, following the polymerization, holdfast saccharides are exported through a multi-protein export channel made of HfsB, HfsA, and HfsD (8-10) [11]. After excretion, holdfast polymer is relocated to the anchoring Hfa group of proteins (11), where they function by holding the mature polysaccharide on the cell's surface of, e.g. C. crescentus or H. baltica , and securing it to the surface [8].

Fig. 1. Holdfast synthesis pathway in C. crescentus consisting of 12 proteins.

Usage

BAIGT

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 1740
    Illegal XbaI site found at 5937
    Illegal PstI site found at 4245
    Illegal PstI site found at 5744
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 1740
    Illegal PstI site found at 4245
    Illegal PstI site found at 5744
    Illegal NotI site found at 475
    Illegal NotI site found at 5417
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 1740
    Illegal BglII site found at 5163
    Illegal BglII site found at 5535
    Illegal BglII site found at 5940
    Illegal BglII site found at 6996
    Illegal BamHI site found at 3305
    Illegal XhoI site found at 6410
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 1740
    Illegal XbaI site found at 5937
    Illegal PstI site found at 4245
    Illegal PstI site found at 5744
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 1740
    Illegal XbaI site found at 5937
    Illegal PstI site found at 4245
    Illegal PstI site found at 5744
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 151
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 343
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 352
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 924
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1087
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2026
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2672
    Illegal AgeI site found at 3363
    Illegal AgeI site found at 6190
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Experimental characterization

Part assembly

All of the proteins composing this system are responsible for polysaccharide polymerization and export. Since the system's proteins are found in the membrane, we concluded that using a low-copy plasmid would decrease the probability of inclusion body formation. Their formation would diminish the functionality of our system, as the proteins would not allow the polysaccharide to be exported outside the bacteria.

We had to assemble this part to further create the holdfast synthesis pathway in E. coli together with composite part: BBa_K52460463, we had to assemble this part first into a backbone of pACYC-Duet-1. We designed a strategy to maximize the success of plasmid assembly by first assembling plasmids with 3 genes (part:BBa_K5246044) and, after verifying the sequences, integrating 3 left genes (part:BBa_K5246045) into that backbone (Fig. 2). In this way, we prevented Golden Gate assembly errors by trying to construct plasmids from 8 or more fragments.

Fig. 2. Plasmid construction strategy. Plasmids are constructed in two rounds, cloning 3 genes at a time. Verified by colony PCR, restriction digestion analysis, and Nanopore sequencing


The BBa_K5246044 assembly was done using Golden Gate assembly with IIS AarI restriction enzyme sites introduced during PCR amplification. The backbone of pACYC-Duet-1 (Novagen) and fragments were amplified using Phusion Plus DNA polymerase, as the genome of C. crescentus has a high GC% content making the appearance of non-specific products during PCR amplification more common and primer design more challenging (Fig. 3). Since hfsA gene had an AarI RE site directly in the gene, this site was domesticated during side directed mutagenesis.


Fig. 3. PCR amplification of target genes from the genome after purification of C. crescentus CB2

Due to the high amount of non-specific products, the fragments were gel-purified. Vectors and fragments composing this operon were mixed in equimolar amounts with GG reaction components and incubated as described in the protocol. The reaction was later transformed into E. coli Mach1 (Thermo Scientific) competent cells. The assembly was then confirmed with restriction digest analysis (Fig. 4), and positive colonies were sequenced.

Fig. 4. Restriction digest analysis of C. crescentus CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI and ScaI, on the right - digested plasmids - 1-6 colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific)

After acquiring sequence-verified clones, we further cloned the 3 remaining genes: hfsF,hfsC, hfsI, this was done the same way as the first 3 genes. After transformation into E. coli , obtained colonies were once again screened with cPCR (Fig. 5) and restriction digestion analysis (Fig. 6). After choosing positive colonies full plasmids with hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI were once again sequenced.

Fig. 5. cPCR of C. crescentus CB2 hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsC-hfsI Golden Gate assembly into pACYC-Duet-1. Expected product length - ~1.5kb. -C - negative control, 1-15 - different colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific).

Fig. 6. Restriction digest analysis of C. crescentus CB2 pACYC-hfsA-hfsB-hfsD-hfsF-hfsC-hfsI. On the left - expected in silico profile of restriction digest with EcoRI, HindIII and XhoI, on the right - digested plasmids - 5,8,10,12,13 positive cPCR colonies, M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (Thermo Scientific).

Part expression optimization

References

1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
7. Toh, E., Kurtz, H. D., & Brun, Y. V. (2008b). Characterization of the Caulobacter crescentus Holdfast Polysaccharide Biosynthesis Pathway Reveals Significant Redundancy in the Initiating Glycosyltransferase and Polymerase Steps. Journal of Bacteriology, 190(21), 7219–7231. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
8.Chepkwony, N. K., Hardy, G. G., & Brun, Y. V. (2022). HfaE Is a Component of the Holdfast Anchor Complex That Tethers the Holdfast Adhesin to the Cell Envelope. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00273-22
9. Hershey, D. M., Fiebig, A., & Crosson, S. (2019). A Genome-Wide Analysis of Adhesion inCaulobacter crescentusIdentifies New Regulatory and Biosynthetic Components for Holdfast Assembly. mBio, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
10. Toh, E., Kurtz, H. D., & Brun, Y. V. (2008c). Characterization of the Caulobacter crescentus Holdfast Polysaccharide Biosynthesis Pathway Reveals Significant Redundancy in the Initiating Glycosyltransferase and Polymerase Steps. Journal of Bacteriology, 190(21), 7219–7231. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
11. Javens, J., Wan, Z., Hardy, G. G., & Brun, Y. V. (2013). Bypassing the need for subcellular localization of a polysaccharide export-anchor complex by overexpressing its protein subunits. Molecular Microbiology, 89(2), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12281