Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5246027"

Revision as of 08:38, 29 September 2024

CB2/CB2A HfsJ Glycosyltransferase, 6xHis tag for purification

Introduction

Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project Synhesion aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - C. crescentus and H. Baltica - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used E. coli bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel E. coli strain for more efficient production of adhesives.

This protein is part of the Tetrad assembly system BBa_K5246043 and operon responsible for addition of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine to N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and deacetylation of the said molecule BBa_K5246042.

Part was used in Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project "Synhesion" https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania/.

This part also has a non 6xhis-tagged variant BBa_K5246012.

Usage and Biology

Caulobacter crescentus is a common freshwater gram-negative oligotrophic bacterium of the clade Caulobacterales. Its distinguishing feature is its dual lifestyle. Initially, C. crescentus daughter cells are in a “swarmer” cell phase, which has a flagellum, enabling them to perform chemotaxis. After the motile phase, they differentiate into “stalked” cells. This phase features a tubular stalk with an adhesive structure called holdfast, allowing them to adhere to surfaces and perform cell division.[1][2]

Caulobacterales synthesize a polysaccharide-based adhesin known as holdfast at one of their cell poles, enabling tight attachment to external surfaces. It is established that holdfast consists of repeating identical units composed of multiple monomers. Current literature agrees that in Caulobacter crescentus, these units form tetrads composed of glucose, an unidentified monosaccharide (either N-mannosamine uronic acid or xylose), N-acetylglucosamine, and N-glucosamine. These units are polymerized and exported to the outer membrane of the cell, where they function as anchors, securing the bacterium to a surface[3][4].

The C. crescentus holdfast is produced via a polysaccharide synthesis and export pathway similar to the group I capsular polysaccharide synthesis Wzy/Wzx-dependent pathway in Escherichia coli.

The holdfast synthesis (hfs) genes include those encoding predicted glycosyltransferases, carbohydrate modification factors, and components of a wzy-type polysaccharide assembly pathway[4][5][6].

HfsJ in particular most probably responsible for mannosaminuronic acid transfer to the glucose acceptor molecule.

Sequence and Features

Experimental characterization

Bioinformatic analysis

CDD analysis revealed that HfsJ is part of the WecB/TgA/CpsF glycosyltransferase family. This family catalyzes the formation of glycosidic bonds and may be involved in the biosynthesis of repeating polysaccharide units found in membrane glycolipids. It has domains very similar to E. coli WecG glycosyltransferase, which is responsible for UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acid transfer. Results are supported by the protein BLAST, which showed significant similarities with the same WecG glycosyltransferase from E. coli.

DeepTMHMM analysis predicted that HfsJ is a globular protein located on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.

AlphaFold 3 structure, with a high confidence score, shows that HfsJ is most likely a globular protein mostly made of alpha helices. A pTM score above 0.5 suggests that the predicted overall structure may closely resemble the true protein fold, while ipTM indicates the accuracy of the subunit positioning within the complex. Values higher than 0.8 represent confident, high-quality predictions (Fig.1).

Based on our findings and prior research, we propose that HfsJ is likely a globular protein responsible for transferring UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acid and catalyzing the formation of a glycosidic bond. [7][8]

Protein expression

CB2 strain

We chose the BL21(DE3) strain for adjustable and efficient expression of target proteins since the system's proteins were best expressed in this strain. Given the lack of time, we went with conditions optimized beforehand in earlier experiments for the whole pathway expression: temperature of 37°C, induction with 0.5 mM IPTG concentration, and expression for 3 hours.

After SDS-PAGE gel analysis, we concluded that we successfully expressed all HfsG, HfsH, HfsJ, HfsK, and HfsL proteins from C. crescentus CB2 and CB2A strains. We noticed that HfsJ and HfsL glycosyltransferases were visible in lower quantities compared to the other proteins. Both of these protein expression conditions need to be further investigated and optimized.

HfsJ is visible in the center of the gel (Fig. 2).

Table 1. C. crescentus protein sizes in kDa

Protein Name	Size (kDa)
HfsG	34
HfsH	27.9
HfsJ	34.7
HfsK	43.3
HfsL	33.3

CB2A strain

We chose the BL21(DE3) strain for adjustable and efficient expression of target proteins since the system's proteins were best expressed in this strain. Given the lack of time, we went with conditions optimized beforehand in earlier experiments for the whole pathway expression: temperature of 37°C, induction with 0.5 mM IPTG concentration, and expression for 3 hours.

After SDS-PAGE gel analysis, we concluded that we successfully expressed all HfsG, HfsH, HfsJ, HfsK, and HfsL proteins from C. crescentus CB2 and CB2A strains. We noticed that HfsJ and HfsL glycosyltransferases were visible in lower quantities compared to the other proteins. Both of these protein expression conditions need to be further investigated and optimized.

HfsJ is visible in the center of the gel (Fig. 2).

Table 1. C. crescentus protein sizes in kDa

Protein Name	Size (kDa)
HfsG	34
HfsH	27.9
HfsJ	34.7
HfsK	43.3
HfsL	33.3

Protein purification

CB2

After successful expression, we proceeded to work on the purification of his-tagged proteins. We went with immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC). Adapting protocols from the little research that was available, we used HisPur Ni-NTA Spin Columns (Thermo Scientific). Equilibration, wash, and elution buffers contained 10 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM, 75 mM, and 500 mM imidazole, respectively.

HfsJ protein was tricky to purify; after expression at low levels, it eluded earlier than expected at 75mM imidazole, but with some optimization, it should be well purifyable .

h2>CB2A</h2>

After successful expression, we proceeded to work on the purification of his-tagged proteins. We went with immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC). Adapting protocols from the little research that was available, we used HisPur Ni-NTA Spin Columns (Thermo Scientific). Equilibration, wash, and elution buffers contained 10 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM, 75 mM, and 500 mM imidazole, respectively.

HfsJ Surprisingly, in comparison with CB2 strain protein CB2A was quite well purifyable considering quite low expression levels and is well seen in the elution fraction at expected size of 34.5kDa .

References

1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
7. Toh, E., Kurtz, Harry D. and Brun, Y.V. (2008) ‘Characterization of the Caulobacter crescentus holdfast polysaccharide biosynthesis pathway reveals significant redundancy in the initiating glycosyltransferase and polymerase steps’, Journal of Bacteriology, 190(21), pp. 7219–7231. doi:10.1128/jb.01003-08.
8. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019b) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.