Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5490026"
Tzonissss13 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K5490026 parameters</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K5490026 parameters</partinfo> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
+ | In synthetic biology, the use of natural promoters has been widespread due to their effectiveness and versatility. By selecting specific promoters, researchers can target gene expression to various cell types or even limit expression to certain tissues. Additionally, different promoters allow for the regulation of protein production at high or low concentrations, depending on the need. However, despite their utility, natural promoters come with significant limitations. One of the biggest challenges is that they rely heavily on the host cell's native machinery, which can introduce unwanted complexity, variability, and reduced control when designing synthetic circuits. | ||
+ | |||
+ | These natural cellular interactions can obscure the intended function of synthetic circuits by introducing confounding variables, making it harder to predict and control the circuit’s behavior. This lack of control can impede the precision required for studying or applying synthetic systems in a predictable manner. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Minimal promoters have emerged as a solution to address many of these challenges. Unlike natural promoters, minimal promoters are much shorter sequences—typically around 30 nucleotides—and only contain the essential elements required for transcription initiation, such as the TATA box where RNA polymerase II binds to initiate transcription. These minimal promoters allow for greater design flexibility and enable researchers to fine-tune gene expression independently of the host’s cellular machinery. | ||
+ | |||
+ | By positioning regulatory elements upstream of the minimal promoter, such as activators or inhibitors, researchers can exert highly specific control over transcription. This modularity enables the precise regulation of gene expression while minimizing interference from endogenous cellular factors. Thus, minimal promoters provide a cleaner and more predictable platform for synthetic circuit design, giving researchers more control over the behavior of their systems and reducing reliance on the host’s complex cellular environment. This independence from cellular machinery is particularly advantageous when designing synthetic circuits with high specificity, reliability, and robustness. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Greenshpan Y, Sharabi O, Yegodayev KM, Novoplansky O, Elkabets M, Gazit R, Porgador A. The Contribution of the Minimal Promoter Element to the Activity of Synthetic Promoters Mediating CAR Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 4;23(13):7431. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137431. PMID: 35806439; PMCID: PMC9266962. | ||
+ | Jin L, Nawab S, Xia M, Ma X, Huo YX. Context-dependency of synthetic minimal promoters in driving gene expression: a case study. Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;12(6):1476-1486. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13489. Epub 2019 Oct 2. PMID: 31578818; PMCID: PMC6801132. |
Latest revision as of 00:21, 29 September 2024
minip
It is a short DNA sequence containing the TATA box, where RNA polymerase II (Pol II) can bind. By positioning specific DNA elements upstream of this sequence, which have high specificity for particular transcription factors or inhibitors, we can synthesize promoters with precise regulatory functions. These promoters can operate independently of the chassis, allowing for controlled gene expression.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 76
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
In synthetic biology, the use of natural promoters has been widespread due to their effectiveness and versatility. By selecting specific promoters, researchers can target gene expression to various cell types or even limit expression to certain tissues. Additionally, different promoters allow for the regulation of protein production at high or low concentrations, depending on the need. However, despite their utility, natural promoters come with significant limitations. One of the biggest challenges is that they rely heavily on the host cell's native machinery, which can introduce unwanted complexity, variability, and reduced control when designing synthetic circuits.
These natural cellular interactions can obscure the intended function of synthetic circuits by introducing confounding variables, making it harder to predict and control the circuit’s behavior. This lack of control can impede the precision required for studying or applying synthetic systems in a predictable manner.
Minimal promoters have emerged as a solution to address many of these challenges. Unlike natural promoters, minimal promoters are much shorter sequences—typically around 30 nucleotides—and only contain the essential elements required for transcription initiation, such as the TATA box where RNA polymerase II binds to initiate transcription. These minimal promoters allow for greater design flexibility and enable researchers to fine-tune gene expression independently of the host’s cellular machinery.
By positioning regulatory elements upstream of the minimal promoter, such as activators or inhibitors, researchers can exert highly specific control over transcription. This modularity enables the precise regulation of gene expression while minimizing interference from endogenous cellular factors. Thus, minimal promoters provide a cleaner and more predictable platform for synthetic circuit design, giving researchers more control over the behavior of their systems and reducing reliance on the host’s complex cellular environment. This independence from cellular machinery is particularly advantageous when designing synthetic circuits with high specificity, reliability, and robustness.
Greenshpan Y, Sharabi O, Yegodayev KM, Novoplansky O, Elkabets M, Gazit R, Porgador A. The Contribution of the Minimal Promoter Element to the Activity of Synthetic Promoters Mediating CAR Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 4;23(13):7431. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137431. PMID: 35806439; PMCID: PMC9266962. Jin L, Nawab S, Xia M, Ma X, Huo YX. Context-dependency of synthetic minimal promoters in driving gene expression: a case study. Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;12(6):1476-1486. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13489. Epub 2019 Oct 2. PMID: 31578818; PMCID: PMC6801132.