Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4229078"
Line 2: Line 2:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4229078 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4229078 short</partinfo>
−
 
−
This Biobrick shows a microcompartment, which is build through liquid-liquid phase seperation, SPD5. It is also an improved biobrick from the original part:BBa_K3009033. As we make it possible to recruit the protein you wish for. Here is Biobrick BBa_K4229076 under the lambda pL and LacI promoter.
 
  
 
Usage:  
 
Usage:  
−
Phase separation droplets can function as membrane-less organelles, found to be related to e.g. microtubule nucleation, stress granules genome organization, etc. in vivo [1]. Moreover, phase-separation has attracted attention in the field of synthetic biology due to its spatial localization and separation properties. SPD-5 is such a liquid-droplet-forming protein and fused to spy-and snoop-tag this allows for the targeting of any catcher-containing protein to the liquid droplets.
+
This biobrick consists of the genetic fusion between Spindle-deficient protein 5 (SPD-5; codon-optimized for expression in Escherichia coli) and the SpyTag  and SnoopTag . It can be used to recruit two proteins (POIs) of interest into the liquid droplets formed by SPD-5 in E. coli. The POIs should be fused to the SpyCatcher  BBa_K42290009 and SnoopCatcher , BBa_K4229010 respectively.
 +
 
  
 
Biology
 
Biology
−
Liquid droplet formation is driven by a manifold of interactions between the molecules involved. Multivalency, describes a molecule capable of interacting with other molecules at many different sites. Therefore, the formation of liquid droplets is depending on the concentration of molecules. Liquid droplets may form from one single type of proteins or multiple different types.  
+
Liquid droplets are membraneless organelles which form by liquid-liquid phase separation. Typically, proteins forming liquid droplets are multivalent, that is, they can bind to many other molecules at many different sites. Therefore, the formation of liquid droplets depends on the concentration of molecules. Liquid droplets may form from one single type of protein or multiple ones. Liquid droplets are expected to be dynamic in vivo. However, it has been observed that the droplets transition from a dynamic, liquid state, to a gel-like, more static one [2]. Liquid droplets have been functionally related for instance to microtubule nucleation [3], and stress granule formation [1].
−
Liquid droplets are expected to be dynamic in vivo. However, over time it is known that phase separating proteins transition from a dynamic state, where the droplets can move inside the cell to a more static gel-like phase, also known as molecular aging. Section based on [1] and [2].
+
Recently, the process of phase separation has attracted attention in the field of synthetic biology due to the possibility to exploit it to perform spatial localization of proteins of interest.
 +
 
 +
Spindle-deficient protein 5 (SPD-5) is a protein naturally found in Caenorhabditis elegans that spontaneously self-assembles liquid droplets in vitro and in vivo [3]. Not only does SPD-5 show the advantageous property of forming liquid droplets in cells, it also has been shown to naturally recruit enzymes and related molecules into them [4]. SPD-5-mediated liquid droplets have been successfully used to enhance the efficiency of reactions, for example improve non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) incorporation with an orthogonal translation system [5].
  
−
SPD-5 is a protein natively expressed in C.elegans which spontaneously self-assemble dynamic organelles in vitro and in vivo [3]. Not only does SPD5 show the advantageous property of forming droplet-like structures, but it also has been shown to naturally recruit enzymes and related molecules into the dynamic formation [4]. Even though SPD5 liquid droplets are dynamic and do not permit exclusive entry and exit of specific molecules, it has been successfully used to enhance the efficiency of reactions, for example, by improving non-canonical amino acid incorporation with an orthogonal translation system [5].
+
The iGEM team Freiburg 2019 showed that SPD-5 forms liquid droplets in E. coli. They used it to recruit specific mRNAs into the droplets to improve ncAA incorporation as done by C. D. Reinkemeier  et al. and colleagues in mammalian cells [5]. For this reason, they genetically fused SPD-5 to the Ms2 coat protein (MCP).
  
 
Experimental Results:
 
Experimental Results:
  
−
Disclaimer: These experiments presented are performed with a version of SPD-5 where silent mutations were introduced through site-directed mutagenesis to make it compatible with the registries assemblies. However, experiments performed on our wiki (iGEM Freiburg 2022) are performed with a SPD-5 with the same aminoacid sequence, but with the slight difference in the DNA sequence. With these results presented on this page, we argue that the silent mutations introduced does not change the function of the protein and that the two versions of SPD-5 are comparable.
+
Aim:  
−
Aim: The biobrick contains SPD-5 fused to spy- and snoop-catcher, which allows for the catching of mVenus and mTurquoise. This is expected cause formation of fluorescent “foci” representing the liquid droplets. Catching via spy- and snoop-tag was further characterized with western blot.
+
Show with fluorescence microscopy that mVenus2 and mTurquoise2 localize into liquid droplets by means of the interaction with SPD-5. Additionally, prove with Western blotting that a peptide bond is formed between the SpyTag and the SpyCatcher and the SnoopTag and the SnoopCatcher, leading to the covalent bond of SPD-5, mVenus2 and mTurquoise2.
−
Experimental setup: Strains are prepared in MG1655 and are co-transformed with either pBbE6a containing SPD-5 or SPD-5 with spy- and snoop-tag on N- and C-term, respectively and pBbA2c containing either mVenus or mTurqouise. Strains were induced at OD: 0.6-0.8 and then incubated for 24h at 18°C. IPTG and Doxycyclin induces the expression of SPD-5 and mVenus/mTurquoise, respectively. Samples were induced with 10 µM IPTG and 25 ng/ml Doxycycline for mVenus and 10 ng/ml for mTurquoise.
+
Experimental setup:  
 +
SPD-5 is N-terminally fused to the SpyCatcher and C-terminally fused to the SnoopCatcher. mVenus2 is C-terminally fused to the SpyTag, while mTurquoise2 is C-terminally fused to the SnoopTag. The plasmids used are the following:
  
 +
[[File:SPD5 Plasmide.jpg|800px|thumb|left|]]
  
−
[[File:SPD51.jpg|800px|thumb|left|Figure 1: Fluorescent microscopy of cells expressing SPD-5 and mVenus. MG1655 was co-transformed with SPD-5 with spy- and snoop-tag on N- and C-term as well as a plasmid expressing A mVenus or B mTurquoise. Bacteria expressing SPD-5 and mVenus or mTurqouise form dots with strong fluorescent intensity (scale bar 5µm).  ]]
 
  
  
Line 54: Line 56:
  
  
 +
MG1655 cells were co-transformed with either pBbE6a containing untagged SPD-5 (original biobrick BBa_K3009033) or SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher (improved biobrick) and pBbA2c containing either mVenus2-SpyTag or mTurqouise2-mTurquoise2-SnoopTag. Cells were induced at OD600 ~ 0.6-0.8 and then incubated for 24 h at 18°C. 10 µM IPTG and 25 ng/ml doxycycline were added to induce the expression of SPD-5/SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatche and mVenus2-SpyTag/mTurquoise2-SnoopTag, respectively.
 +
For the microscopy, the images were taken after 24 h of induction with IPTG and doxycycline in an inverse Zeiss Axio Observer Z1/7 fluorescence microscope equipped with a Pecon light tight incubator, an alpha Plan-Apochromat 100x/1.46 Oil DIC (UV) M27 objective with Zeiss Immersol 518 F immersion oil and an Axiocam 506 mono camera. The selected channel in Zeiss Zen 3.0 (blue edition) for images was GFP and brightfield. Excitation was done automatically using the EGFP channel (475 nm LED, 5-20 % intensity, 150 ms exposure time) and filters for excitation wavelength at 488 nm and emission wavelength at 509 nm.
  
 +
Results:
  
 +
[[File:SPD51.jpg|800px|thumb|left|Figure 1: Representative fluorescence microscopy images of MG1655 cells co-transformed with pBbE6a-SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher and either pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag  or pBbA2c-mTurqouise2. Scale bar, 5µm.    ]]
  
−
[[File:Spd54.png|800px|thumb|left|Figure 2: Western blot of catching between SPD-5 and mVenus or mTurquoise. MG1655 was co-transformed with a plasmid with SPD-5 with spy- and snoop-tag on N- and C-term and either a plasmid expressing mVenus (lane 2, 3, 4, 5) or a plasmid expressing mTurquoise (lane 6,7, 8, 9). There is a shift in the band for mVenus and mTurquoise when expressed in the presence of SPD-5]]
 
  
  
Line 91: Line 96:
  
  
 +
[[File:SPD5.2.png|800px|thumb|left|Figure 2: Western blot showing the formation of the peptide bond between SPD-5 and mVenus2. MG1655 cells were either co-transformed with pBbE6a-SPD-5 and pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag or with pBbE6a-SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher and pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag.  (-/+) refers to whether the sample was induced or not.  ]]
  
  
Line 106: Line 112:
  
  
−
Figure 1 shows fluorescent microscopy of the same samples presented in Figure 2. When expressed alone mVenus and mTurqouise are located throuout the cytoplasm and do not show any presence of liquid droplets. However, when expressed in the presence of SPD-5 fused with spy- and snoop-tag, there are a clear localization of the fluorescence to the poles of the cells.
 
−
Figure 2 shows the western blot of the same samples as above, for SPD-5 and mTurquoise or mVenus. For both the spy-catcher containing mVenus and the snoop-catcher containing mTurquoise, the western blot shows a clear shift in their bands, when expressed in the presence of SPD-5_spy/snoop. These results are in agreement with previous western blot performed with not mutated SPD-5. These results therefore show that the SPD-5 with spy-and snoop-tag is capable of catching the respective cargo proteins, which the SPD-5 alone, according to our previous results, is not capable of.
 
−
Conclusion:
 
−
From the fluorescent microscopy and the western blots comparing the previous not mutated SPD5-5 we can conclude that the results obtained of these two constructs are highly similar and it is fair to assume that the silent mutations we performed with site-directed mutagenesis, do not influence the function of the SPD-5 and also not its ability to catch cargo through the spy- and snoop-tag.
 
  
−
[1] S. Alberti, “Phase separation in biology,” 2017, doi: 10.1111/pbi.1280.
 
  
−
[2] M. C. Huber et al., “Designer amphiphilic proteins as building blocks for the intracellular formation of organelle-like compartments,” Nat Mater, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 125–132, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmat4118.
 
  
−
[3] D. R. Hamill, A. F. Severson, J. C. Carter, and B. Bowerman, “Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiled-coil domains,” Dev. Cell, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 673–684, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00327-1.
 
  
−
[4] A. K. Tiwary and Y. Zheng, “Protein phase separation in mitosis,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 92–98, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.011.
 
  
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
Discussion:
 +
Figure 1 shows fluorescent microscopy of the same samples presented in Figure 2. When expressed alone, mVenus2-SpyTag and mTurqouise2-SnoopTag are homogenously distributed in the cytoplasm of the bacterial cells. When expressed in the presence of SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher, we observe the appearance of fluorescent foci towards the poles of the cells.
 +
Figure 2 shows the Western blot of the same samples shown in Figure 1. When expressed with untagged SPD-5, mVenus2-SpyTag runs at its expected size. When expressed in the presence of SpyCatcher-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher, we observe the appearance of higher molecular weight band corresponding to the fusion of the protein to SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher.
 +
 +
Conclusions:
 +
From the fluorescent microscopy, we conclude that SPD-5 fused to the catchers still forms liquid droplets in E. coli. From the western blot comparing the untagged SPD-5 (old biobrick) to the version with the catchers (improved biobrick), we can conclude that the protein of interest (mVenus in this example) are fused to SPD-5, thus co-localizing with it into the liquid droplets.
 +
 +
Improvement:
 +
This new biobrick can now be used to localize proteins of interest into liquid droplets in E. coli.
 +
 +
[1] S. Alberti, “Phase separation in biology,” 2017, doi: 10.1111/pbi.1280.
 +
[2] M. C. Huber et al., “Designer amphiphilic proteins as building blocks for the intracellular formation of organelle-like compartments,” Nat Mater, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 125–132, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmat4118.
 +
[3] D. R. Hamill, A. F. Severson, J. C. Carter, and B. Bowerman, “Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiled-coil domains,” Dev. Cell, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 673–684, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00327-1.
 +
[4] A. K. Tiwary and Y. Zheng, “Protein phase separation in mitosis,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 92–98, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.011.
 
[5] C. D. Reinkemeier, G. E. Girona, and E. A. Lemke, “Designer membraneless organelles enable codon reassignment of selected mRNAs in eukaryotes,” Science (80-. )., vol. 363, no. 6434, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2644.
 
[5] C. D. Reinkemeier, G. E. Girona, and E. A. Lemke, “Designer membraneless organelles enable codon reassignment of selected mRNAs in eukaryotes,” Science (80-. )., vol. 363, no. 6434, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2644.
 +
 +
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===

Revision as of 16:34, 13 October 2022


SPD5 with SnoopTag and SpyTag regulated by lamdapL promotor and LacI promotor

Usage: This biobrick consists of the genetic fusion between Spindle-deficient protein 5 (SPD-5; codon-optimized for expression in Escherichia coli) and the SpyTag and SnoopTag . It can be used to recruit two proteins (POIs) of interest into the liquid droplets formed by SPD-5 in E. coli. The POIs should be fused to the SpyCatcher BBa_K42290009 and SnoopCatcher , BBa_K4229010 respectively.


Biology Liquid droplets are membraneless organelles which form by liquid-liquid phase separation. Typically, proteins forming liquid droplets are multivalent, that is, they can bind to many other molecules at many different sites. Therefore, the formation of liquid droplets depends on the concentration of molecules. Liquid droplets may form from one single type of protein or multiple ones. Liquid droplets are expected to be dynamic in vivo. However, it has been observed that the droplets transition from a dynamic, liquid state, to a gel-like, more static one [2]. Liquid droplets have been functionally related for instance to microtubule nucleation [3], and stress granule formation [1]. Recently, the process of phase separation has attracted attention in the field of synthetic biology due to the possibility to exploit it to perform spatial localization of proteins of interest.

Spindle-deficient protein 5 (SPD-5) is a protein naturally found in Caenorhabditis elegans that spontaneously self-assembles liquid droplets in vitro and in vivo [3]. Not only does SPD-5 show the advantageous property of forming liquid droplets in cells, it also has been shown to naturally recruit enzymes and related molecules into them [4]. SPD-5-mediated liquid droplets have been successfully used to enhance the efficiency of reactions, for example improve non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) incorporation with an orthogonal translation system [5].

The iGEM team Freiburg 2019 showed that SPD-5 forms liquid droplets in E. coli. They used it to recruit specific mRNAs into the droplets to improve ncAA incorporation as done by C. D. Reinkemeier et al. and colleagues in mammalian cells [5]. For this reason, they genetically fused SPD-5 to the Ms2 coat protein (MCP).

Experimental Results:

Aim: Show with fluorescence microscopy that mVenus2 and mTurquoise2 localize into liquid droplets by means of the interaction with SPD-5. Additionally, prove with Western blotting that a peptide bond is formed between the SpyTag and the SpyCatcher and the SnoopTag and the SnoopCatcher, leading to the covalent bond of SPD-5, mVenus2 and mTurquoise2. Experimental setup: SPD-5 is N-terminally fused to the SpyCatcher and C-terminally fused to the SnoopCatcher. mVenus2 is C-terminally fused to the SpyTag, while mTurquoise2 is C-terminally fused to the SnoopTag. The plasmids used are the following:

SPD5 Plasmide.jpg

















MG1655 cells were co-transformed with either pBbE6a containing untagged SPD-5 (original biobrick BBa_K3009033) or SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher (improved biobrick) and pBbA2c containing either mVenus2-SpyTag or mTurqouise2-mTurquoise2-SnoopTag. Cells were induced at OD600 ~ 0.6-0.8 and then incubated for 24 h at 18°C. 10 µM IPTG and 25 ng/ml doxycycline were added to induce the expression of SPD-5/SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatche and mVenus2-SpyTag/mTurquoise2-SnoopTag, respectively. For the microscopy, the images were taken after 24 h of induction with IPTG and doxycycline in an inverse Zeiss Axio Observer Z1/7 fluorescence microscope equipped with a Pecon light tight incubator, an alpha Plan-Apochromat 100x/1.46 Oil DIC (UV) M27 objective with Zeiss Immersol 518 F immersion oil and an Axiocam 506 mono camera. The selected channel in Zeiss Zen 3.0 (blue edition) for images was GFP and brightfield. Excitation was done automatically using the EGFP channel (475 nm LED, 5-20 % intensity, 150 ms exposure time) and filters for excitation wavelength at 488 nm and emission wavelength at 509 nm.

Results:

Figure 1: Representative fluorescence microscopy images of MG1655 cells co-transformed with pBbE6a-SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher and either pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag or pBbA2c-mTurqouise2. Scale bar, 5µm.


















Figure 2: Western blot showing the formation of the peptide bond between SPD-5 and mVenus2. MG1655 cells were either co-transformed with pBbE6a-SPD-5 and pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag or with pBbE6a-SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher and pBbA2c-mVenus2-SpyTag. (-/+) refers to whether the sample was induced or not.




























Discussion: Figure 1 shows fluorescent microscopy of the same samples presented in Figure 2. When expressed alone, mVenus2-SpyTag and mTurqouise2-SnoopTag are homogenously distributed in the cytoplasm of the bacterial cells. When expressed in the presence of SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher, we observe the appearance of fluorescent foci towards the poles of the cells. Figure 2 shows the Western blot of the same samples shown in Figure 1. When expressed with untagged SPD-5, mVenus2-SpyTag runs at its expected size. When expressed in the presence of SpyCatcher-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher, we observe the appearance of higher molecular weight band corresponding to the fusion of the protein to SpyCacther-SPD-5-SnoopCatcher.

Conclusions: From the fluorescent microscopy, we conclude that SPD-5 fused to the catchers still forms liquid droplets in E. coli. From the western blot comparing the untagged SPD-5 (old biobrick) to the version with the catchers (improved biobrick), we can conclude that the protein of interest (mVenus in this example) are fused to SPD-5, thus co-localizing with it into the liquid droplets.

Improvement: This new biobrick can now be used to localize proteins of interest into liquid droplets in E. coli.

[1] S. Alberti, “Phase separation in biology,” 2017, doi: 10.1111/pbi.1280. [2] M. C. Huber et al., “Designer amphiphilic proteins as building blocks for the intracellular formation of organelle-like compartments,” Nat Mater, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 125–132, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmat4118. [3] D. R. Hamill, A. F. Severson, J. C. Carter, and B. Bowerman, “Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiled-coil domains,” Dev. Cell, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 673–684, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00327-1. [4] A. K. Tiwary and Y. Zheng, “Protein phase separation in mitosis,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 92–98, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.011. [5] C. D. Reinkemeier, G. E. Girona, and E. A. Lemke, “Designer membraneless organelles enable codon reassignment of selected mRNAs in eukaryotes,” Science (80-. )., vol. 363, no. 6434, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2644.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 443
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 2862
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 4036
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1840
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 443
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 2862
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 4036
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1840
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 443
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 2862
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 4036
    Illegal BglII site found at 452
    Illegal BglII site found at 2763
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 443
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 2862
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 4036
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1840
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 443
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 2862
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 4036
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1840
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 335
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]