Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3396000"
Line 49: Line 49:
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
−
                  Figure 2.: Predicted 3D structure of Docs-His designed by TRrosetta tool.
+
                      Figure 2.: Predicted 3D structure of Docs-His designed by TRrosetta tool.
  
  
Line 56: Line 56:
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
−
                                Table 2.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of Docs-His structure.  
+
                              Table 2.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of Docs-His structure.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:12px;"> 1.2. Docking </p>
 +
 
 +
Tagged Docs with GST and His has been docked with Coh2 tagged with GST and His by different tools to get the best model. Best docked structures were retrieved from ClusPro and Galaxy.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:12px;"> Docs-GST VS Coh-His by Cluspro </p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<html>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/parts-registry/gst-docs-his-coh-cluspro.png" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 +
</html>
 +
 
 +
                  Figure 3.: Docked structure of Docs-GST VS Coh2-His designed by Cluspro.
 +
 +
 
  
  

Revision as of 10:08, 6 October 2022


DocS

The Coch2 module binds DocS (BBa_K3396000) modules constitutively.

Usage and Biology

The DocS[1] module comes from The C. thermocellum scaffoldin and it could recognize and bind tightly to complementary Coh2 modules. The Coh2–DocS pair represents the interaction between two complementary families of protein modules that exhibit divergent specificities and affinities, ranging from one of the highest known affinity constants between two proteins to relatively low-affinity interactions.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Improvement by CU_Egypt team 2022


From literature we found that the yield of expression of Docs is very low so we decided to tag it by GST to increase its stability and the yield. Also, we optimized the sequence to be expressed in E-coli. in addition, there is no characterization for Docs on the registry so we expressed and characterized it by different methods such as Agarose gel electrophoresis, SDS PAGE, transformation efficiency, affinity chromatography, and Bradford assay. it's proved by wet lab results that the expression yield of Docs has raised with tagging by GST.

1. Dry Lab

1.1. Modeling

Docs has been tagged with GST and His for purification and increasing the yield by the GST tag. then the model designed by several tools to get the best model.

Docs-GST 

                 Figure 1.: Predicted 3D structure of Docs-GST designed by RosettaFold tool.



                                Table 1.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of Docs-GST structure.



Docs-His 

                      Figure 2.: Predicted 3D structure of Docs-His designed by TRrosetta tool.



                              Table 2.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of Docs-His structure.



1.2. Docking

Tagged Docs with GST and His has been docked with Coh2 tagged with GST and His by different tools to get the best model. Best docked structures were retrieved from ClusPro and Galaxy.


Docs-GST VS Coh-His by Cluspro 


                 Figure 3.: Docked structure of Docs-GST VS Coh2-His designed by Cluspro.



Reference

[1] BARAK Y, HANDELSMAN T, NAKAR D, et al. Matching fusion protein systems for affinity analysis of two interacting families of proteins: the cohesin-dockerin interaction [J]. J Mol Recognit, 2005, 18(6): 491-501.