Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3425033"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | The distance between an RBS and the ATG start codon is an important factor affecting the strength of an RBS. Whereas BioBrick assembly generates six-nucleotide scar between the RBS and the ATG, Type IIS iGEM Standard assembly generates only one-nucleotide scar. Therefore, five nucleotides were added to the <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_B0030">BBa_B0030</a> for its use in | + | The distance between an RBS and the ATG start codon is an important factor affecting the strength of an RBS. Whereas BioBrick assembly generates six-nucleotide scar between the RBS and the ATG, <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly/Type_IIS">Type IIS iGEM Standard assembly</a> generates only one-nucleotide scar. Therefore, five nucleotides were added to the <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_B0030">BBa_B0030</a> for its use in Type IIS assembly. However, note that the nucleotides are different. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 14 October 2020
iGEM Type IIS pSB1K03-DY
BBa_K3425025 is an RBS (BBa_B0030) modified for Type IIS iGEM Standard assembly (RFC1000) by adding a five-nucleotide spacer (TAGTA) to the end of the sequence.
The distance between an RBS and the ATG start codon is an important factor affecting the strength of an RBS. Whereas BioBrick assembly generates six-nucleotide scar between the RBS and the ATG, Type IIS iGEM Standard assembly generates only one-nucleotide scar. Therefore, five nucleotides were added to the BBa_B0030 for its use in Type IIS assembly. However, note that the nucleotides are different.
Generally, the strength of an RBS depends heavily on 1) the sequence of the RBS 2) the aligned spacing and 3) the upstream and downstream genetic context. Ancestral RBS BBa_B0030 was characterized as strong, however due to the dependence on the sequence context, the results are necessarily affected by the choice of the reporter. In line with that, previous characterizations report different relative strength of
In conclusion, the performance of BBa_K3425025 can be only approximated by the characterization available for BBa_B0030 and it will always differ for expression of different genes.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]