Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2992012"
(→References) |
(→Characterisation) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Characterisation=== | ===Characterisation=== | ||
− | + | ||
+ | This basic part was used for the assembly of our composite parts and characterised using using FAST and acetone assays. This part was used as a promoter which functions in both the Gram-negative E. coli and the Gram-positive Clostridium <i>sporogenens</i>. More information can be found on our [https://2019.igem.org/Team:Nottingham/Results Results Page].<br> <br> <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/5/5e/T--Nottingham--Basic4.png | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/6b/T--Nottingham--Basic3.png | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Characterisation of this promoter against P<i>fdx</i>, P<i>thl</i> and P<i>botR</i> using FAST fluorescent assay, showed P<i>ntnh</i> to be an effective promoter in E.<i>coli</i> and only slightly stronger than no promoter in C.<i>sporogenes</i>. <br> In the C. <i>sporogenes</i> experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two Pfdx derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two C. <i>botulinum</i> promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the E. <i>coli</i> lysates as opposed to the C. <i>sporogenes</i> lysates. In those experiments, activity from the P<i>botR</i> and P<i>ntnh</i> constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control. <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Acetone data.png]] | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native P<i>botR</i> promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from P<i>pyrKDE</i>. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter P<i>fdx</i>. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when <i>botR</i> was absent from the genome of <i>C. sporogenes</i> and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in <i>C. sporogenes</i> as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs. | ||
+ | |||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Revision as of 18:26, 21 October 2019
PbotR from C. botulinum
Promoter region for botR in C. botulinum
Usage and Biology
This promoter region is found naturally upstream of the botR 5’-UTR in C. botulinum. BotR is an alternative sigma factor involved in the positive regulation of botulinum neurotoxin and associated genes. In our project, we use PbotR to drive the expression of botR (BBa_K2992002) which in turn, regulates the production of our volatile reporter genes which we have placed under the control of neurotoxin and neurotoxin-associated promoters (add hyperlinks). Doing so allows us to link volatile reporter production with neurotoxin production following food manufacturing processes.
Characterisation
This basic part was used for the assembly of our composite parts and characterised using using FAST and acetone assays. This part was used as a promoter which functions in both the Gram-negative E. coli and the Gram-positive Clostridium sporogenens. More information can be found on our Results Page.
Characterisation of this promoter against Pfdx, Pthl and PbotR using FAST fluorescent assay, showed Pntnh to be an effective promoter in E.coli and only slightly stronger than no promoter in C.sporogenes.
In the C. sporogenes experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two Pfdx derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two C. botulinum promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the E. coli lysates as opposed to the C. sporogenes lysates. In those experiments, activity from the PbotR and Pntnh constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control.
The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native PbotR promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from PpyrKDE. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter Pfdx. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when botR was absent from the genome of C. sporogenes and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in C. sporogenes as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
References
Raffestin, S., Dupuy, B., Marvaud, J. and Popoff, M. (2004). BotR/A and TetR are alternative RNA polymerase sigma factors controlling the expression of the neurotoxin and associated protein genes in Clostridium botulinum type A and Clostridium tetani. Molecular Microbiology, 55(1), pp.235-249.
Zhang, Z., Korkeala, H., Dahlsten, E., Sahala, E., Heap, J., Minton, N. and Lindström, M. (2013). Two-Component Signal Transduction System CBO0787/CBO0786 Represses Transcription from Botulinum Neurotoxin Promoters in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502. PLoS Pathogens, 9(3), p.e1003252.