Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3187002"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
− | + | <h3>Profile</h3> | |
− | + | <table style=“width:80%“> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Name</b></td> | |
− | + | <td>P22 Bacteriophage Scaffolding Protein</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Base pairs</b></td> | |
− | + | <td>782</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Molecular weight</b></td> | |
− | + | <td>19.3 kDa</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Origin</b></td> | |
− | + | <td> <i>Enterobacteria phage P22</i></td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Parts</b></td> | |
− | + | <td> pT7-promoter, lac Operator, Strep-tag II, Scaffold protein,T7 Terminator </td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td><b>Properties</b></td> | |
− | + | <td> In combination with the coat protein<a href=”https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187001”>(BBa_K3187001) </a> | |
+ | this protein builds the virus capsid of the P22 phage. </td> </tr> </table> <h3> Usage and Biology</h3> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | The P22 scaffold protein (SP) is an important part of the Enterobacteria phage P22 capsid. | + | The P22 scaffold protein (SP) is an important part of the Enterobacteria phage P22 capsid. The virus |
− | <sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"> | + | capsid is assembled with the help of up to 300 copies of the 18 kDa scaffold protein out of |
− | + | approx. 400 copies of the 47 kDa coat protein | |
− | + | <sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"> | |
− | </sup> | + | <a href="#cite_note-1">[1] |
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
− | <sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"> | + | <sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"> |
− | + | <a href="#cite_note-2">[2] | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | </sup> | + | </sup> |
− | . | + | . |
− | <br> | + | <br> |
− | + | After the assembly of the virus-capsid the SP is released into the capsid. In case of a functional | |
+ | P22 bacteriophage, this protein is extracted out of the capsid <i>in vivo</i> while the viral DNA is | ||
+ | loaded into the capsid | ||
− | <sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"> | + | <sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"> |
− | + | <a href="#cite_note-3">[3] | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | </sup> | + | </sup> |
− | <sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"> | + | <sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"> |
− | + | <a href="#cite_note-4">[4] | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | </sup> | + | </sup> |
− | . Because the artificial capsid is not filled with DNA the SP remains in the capsid. By fusing the SP with a cargo-protein, one can load the capsid with said cargo | + | . Because the artificial capsid is not filled with DNA the SP remains in the capsid. By fusing the |
+ | SP with a cargo-protein, one can load the capsid with said cargo | ||
− | <sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"> | + | <sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"> |
− | + | <a href="#cite_note-5">[5] | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | </sup> | + | </sup> |
− | . This fusion has to occur at the N-Terminus of the SP, because the C-Terminus is important for mechanism of the assembly | + | . This fusion has to occur at the N-Terminus of the SP, because the C-Terminus is important for |
+ | mechanism of the assembly | ||
− | <sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"> | + | <sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"> |
− | + | <a href="#cite_note-6">[6] | |
− | + | </a> | |
− | </sup> | + | </sup> |
− | . | + | . |
− | <br> | + | <br> |
− | Here the scaffold protein(SP) is fused with a Strep-tagII for protein purification. The construct contains a pT7 promoter for the T7 polymerase, a lac operator, so expression can be induced with IPTG, and T7 Terminator. | + | Here the scaffold protein(SP) is fused with a Strep-tagII for protein purification. The construct |
+ | contains a pT7 promoter for the T7 polymerase, a lac operator, so expression can be induced with | ||
+ | IPTG, and T7 Terminator. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | ||
<h3> Methods</h3> | <h3> Methods</h3> | ||
<h4>Cloning</h4> | <h4>Cloning</h4> | ||
− | <p>This constructed was cloned using PCR with overhang primers and <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Notebook" target="_blank">restriction and ligation</a> out of sfGFP-SP construct <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187003">BBa_K3187003</a>. | + | <p>This constructed was cloned using PCR with overhang primers and <a |
− | + | href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Notebook" target="_blank">restriction and | |
+ | ligation</a> out of sfGFP-SP construct <a | ||
+ | href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187003">BBa_K3187003</a>. | ||
+ | To verify the cloning, | ||
the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab. | the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<h4>Purification</h4> | <h4>Purification</h4> | ||
− | <p>The SP was heterologously expressed in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 and purified with | + | <p>The SP was heterologously expressed in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 and purified with |
− | + | <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Notebook" target="_blank">GE Healthcare | |
+ | ÄKTA Pure FPLC</a>.Strep-tag II was used as affinity tag. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<h4>SDS-Page and Western blot</h4> | <h4>SDS-Page and Western blot</h4> | ||
− | <p>To verify that the Protein was produced, a SDS-Page <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Notebook"target="_blank">SDS-Page</a> followed by a | + | <p>To verify that the Protein was produced, a SDS-Page <a |
− | <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/62/T--TU_Darmstadt--Methoden.pdf" target="_blank">Western blot</a> was performed. | + | href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Notebook" target="_blank">SDS-Page</a> |
+ | followed by a | ||
+ | <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/62/T--TU_Darmstadt--Methoden.pdf" | ||
+ | target="_blank">Western blot</a> was performed. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <h3>Results</h3> | + | |
+ | <h4>Assembly</h4> | ||
+ | <p> The assembly was tested <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i>. The assembled VLPs are collected with | ||
+ | ultracentrifugation <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/62/T--TU_Darmstadt--Methoden.pdf" | ||
+ | target="_blank">ultracentrifugatione</a> and are visualized with | ||
+ | <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/62/T--TU_Darmstadt--Methoden.pdf" | ||
+ | target="_blank">TEM</a>. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h3>Results</h3> | ||
<h4>Cloning and Expression</h4> | <h4>Cloning and Expression</h4> | ||
<p>The successful cloning was proven with sanger sequencing and production with a Western blot. | <p>The successful cloning was proven with sanger sequencing and production with a Western blot. | ||
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div style="text-align: center;"> | |
− | + | <img class="img-fluid center" | |
− | + | src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/1/1a/T--TU_Darmstadt--westernplot_sp.jpeg" | |
− | + | style="max-width:60%" /> | |
− | + | <div class="caption"> | |
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | <b>Figure 1:</b> | |
− | + | Western blot of all produced and purified proteins. | |
− | <p>Fig. 1 shows that SP has a molecular weight of approximatley 30 kDa. This is more than the theoretical weight. Because the fusion prtoein of SP and sfGFP <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187003">(BBa_K3187003)</a> has the expected length and has two more bands that have the length of sfGFP and of SP and because the sequencing wethink that we haeve the right proein but it behaves unexpected in the SDS-Page. The proteins were detected with Strep-Tactin-HRP.</p> | + | </p> |
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Fig. 1 shows that SP has a molecular weight of approximatley 30 kDa. This is more than | ||
+ | the theoretical weight. Because the fusion prtoein of SP and sfGFP <a | ||
+ | href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187003">(BBa_K3187003)</a> has the expected | ||
+ | length and has two more bands that have the length of sfGFP and of SP and because the | ||
+ | sequencing wethink that we haeve the right proein but it behaves unexpected in the SDS-Page. | ||
+ | The proteins were detected with Strep-Tactin-HRP.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h4> Assembly</h4> | <h4> Assembly</h4> | ||
− | <p> The images of ultracentrifugation displays that monomeric proteins were separated from assembled capsids by | + | <p> The images of ultracentrifugation displays that monomeric proteins were separated from assembled |
− | + | capsids by | |
− | + | ultracentrifugation at 150.000 x g in a sucrose cushion (35% w/v). After completion of the | |
− | + | ultracentrifugation | |
− | + | reatment, sediment was clearly visible in the centrifuge tube which we suspected to mainly contain | |
− | + | VLPs. | |
− | + | Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to image capsids taken from the sediment. For | |
− | + | increased | |
− | + | contrast, samples were negative-stained with uranyl acetate. We were able to show a high density of | |
− | + | visually | |
− | + | intact VLPs all over the sample measuring a diameter of 60 nm or less (Fig. 2). For more information | |
− | + | about VLP assembly, | |
− | + | visit our <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/P22_VLP" | |
− | + | target="_blank">wiki</a>. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <div style="text-align: center;"> | |
− | < | + | <img class="img-fluid center" src="" style="max-width:60%" /> |
+ | <div class="caption"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 2:</b> TEM picture of assembled VLPs | ||
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <h2>References</h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <ol class="references"> | |
− | + | <li id="cite_note-1"> | |
− | + | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | |
− | + | <a href="#cite_ref-1">↑</a> | |
− | + | </span> | |
− | + | <span class="reference-text"> | |
− | + | W. Earnshaw, S. Casjens, S. C. Harrison, Assembly of the head of bacteriophage P22: X-ray | |
− | + | diffraction from heads, proheads and related structures J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 104, 387. | |
− | + | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" | |
+ | href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(76)90278-3">[1] </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | <li id="cite_note-2"> | ||
+ | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | ||
+ | <a href="#cite_ref-2">↑</a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <span class="reference-text"> | ||
+ | W. Jiang, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, M. L. Baker, P. E. Prevelige, W. Chiu, Coat protein fold and | ||
+ | maturation transition of bacteriophage P22 seen at subnanometer resolutions, Nat. Struct. | ||
+ | Biol. 2003, 10, 131. | ||
+ | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb891">[2] </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li id="cite_note-3"> | ||
+ | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | ||
+ | <a href="#cite_ref-3">↑</a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <span class="reference-text"> | ||
+ | King, J., and Casjens, S. (1974). Catalytic head assembling protein in virus morphogenesis. | ||
+ | Nature 251:112-119. | ||
+ | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" | ||
+ | href="https://www.nature.com/articles/251112a0">[3] </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li id="cite_note-4"> | ||
+ | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | ||
+ | <a href="#cite_ref-4">↑</a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <span class="reference-text"> | ||
+ | S. Casjens and R. Hendrix, (1988) "Control mechanisms in dsDNA bacteriophage assembly", in | ||
+ | The Bacteriophages, volume 1, ed. R. Calendar, Plenum Press, p. 15-91. | ||
+ | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" | ||
+ | href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5424-6_2">[4] </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | <li id="cite_note-5"> | ||
+ | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | ||
+ | <a href="#cite_ref-5">↑</a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <span class="reference-text"> | ||
+ | Dustin P. Patterson, Benjamin Schwarz, Ryan S. Waters, Tomas Gedeon, and Trevor Douglas, | ||
+ | Encapsulation of an Enzyme Cascade within the Bacteriophage P22 Virus-Like Particle | ||
+ | ,ACS Chemical Biology 2014 9 (2), 359-365 | ||
+ | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cb4006529">[5] | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | </ | + | <li id="cite_note-6"> |
+ | <span class="mw-cite-backlink"> | ||
+ | <a href="#cite_ref-6">↑</a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <span class="reference-text"> | ||
+ | P. R. Weigele, L. Sampson, D. Winn‐Stapley, S. R. Casjens, Molecular Genetics of | ||
+ | Bacteriophage P22 Scaffolding Protein's Functional Domains | ||
+ | , J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 348, 831. | ||
+ | <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" | ||
+ | href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.004">[6] </a> | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Revision as of 14:50, 17 October 2019
P22 Bacteriophage Scaffolding Protein
Profile
Name | P22 Bacteriophage Scaffolding Protein |
Base pairs | 782 |
Molecular weight | 19.3 kDa |
Origin | Enterobacteria phage P22 |
Parts | pT7-promoter, lac Operator, Strep-tag II, Scaffold protein,T7 Terminator |
Properties | In combination with the coat protein(BBa_K3187001) this protein builds the virus capsid of the P22 phage. |
Usage and Biology
The P22 scaffold protein (SP) is an important part of the Enterobacteria phage P22 capsid. The virus
capsid is assembled with the help of up to 300 copies of the 18 kDa scaffold protein out of
approx. 400 copies of the 47 kDa coat protein
[1]
[2]
.
After the assembly of the virus-capsid the SP is released into the capsid. In case of a functional
P22 bacteriophage, this protein is extracted out of the capsid in vivo while the viral DNA is
loaded into the capsid
[3]
[4]
. Because the artificial capsid is not filled with DNA the SP remains in the capsid. By fusing the
SP with a cargo-protein, one can load the capsid with said cargo
[5]
. This fusion has to occur at the N-Terminus of the SP, because the C-Terminus is important for
mechanism of the assembly
[6]
.
Here the scaffold protein(SP) is fused with a Strep-tagII for protein purification. The construct
contains a pT7 promoter for the T7 polymerase, a lac operator, so expression can be induced with
IPTG, and T7 Terminator.
Methods
Cloning
This constructed was cloned using PCR with overhang primers and restriction and ligation out of sfGFP-SP construct BBa_K3187003. To verify the cloning, the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab.
Purification
The SP was heterologously expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified with GE Healthcare ÄKTA Pure FPLC.Strep-tag II was used as affinity tag.
SDS-Page and Western blot
To verify that the Protein was produced, a SDS-Page SDS-Page followed by a Western blot was performed.
Assembly
The assembly was tested in vivo and in vitro. The assembled VLPs are collected with ultracentrifugation ultracentrifugatione and are visualized with TEM.
Results
Cloning and Expression
The successful cloning was proven with sanger sequencing and production with a Western blot.
Fig. 1 shows that SP has a molecular weight of approximatley 30 kDa. This is more than the theoretical weight. Because the fusion prtoein of SP and sfGFP (BBa_K3187003) has the expected length and has two more bands that have the length of sfGFP and of SP and because the sequencing wethink that we haeve the right proein but it behaves unexpected in the SDS-Page. The proteins were detected with Strep-Tactin-HRP.
Assembly
The images of ultracentrifugation displays that monomeric proteins were separated from assembled capsids by ultracentrifugation at 150.000 x g in a sucrose cushion (35% w/v). After completion of the ultracentrifugation reatment, sediment was clearly visible in the centrifuge tube which we suspected to mainly contain VLPs. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to image capsids taken from the sediment. For increased contrast, samples were negative-stained with uranyl acetate. We were able to show a high density of visually intact VLPs all over the sample measuring a diameter of 60 nm or less (Fig. 2). For more information about VLP assembly, visit our wiki.
References
- ↑ W. Earnshaw, S. Casjens, S. C. Harrison, Assembly of the head of bacteriophage P22: X-ray diffraction from heads, proheads and related structures J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 104, 387. [1]
- ↑ W. Jiang, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, M. L. Baker, P. E. Prevelige, W. Chiu, Coat protein fold and maturation transition of bacteriophage P22 seen at subnanometer resolutions, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 131. [2]
- ↑ King, J., and Casjens, S. (1974). Catalytic head assembling protein in virus morphogenesis. Nature 251:112-119. [3]
- ↑ S. Casjens and R. Hendrix, (1988) "Control mechanisms in dsDNA bacteriophage assembly", in The Bacteriophages, volume 1, ed. R. Calendar, Plenum Press, p. 15-91. [4]
- ↑ Dustin P. Patterson, Benjamin Schwarz, Ryan S. Waters, Tomas Gedeon, and Trevor Douglas, Encapsulation of an Enzyme Cascade within the Bacteriophage P22 Virus-Like Particle ,ACS Chemical Biology 2014 9 (2), 359-365 [5]
- ↑ P. R. Weigele, L. Sampson, D. Winn‐Stapley, S. R. Casjens, Molecular Genetics of Bacteriophage P22 Scaffolding Protein's Functional Domains , J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 348, 831. [6]
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 96
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 485
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]