Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K122000"
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Table 3. The 96 well plate layout for OD600 and Fluorescence measurements. | Table 3. The 96 well plate layout for OD600 and Fluorescence measurements. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | |||
|Negative control | |Negative control | ||
|Positive control | |Positive control | ||
|pPGK1 | |pPGK1 | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|Colony 1 Replicate 1 | |Colony 1 Replicate 1 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 1 | |Colony 2 Replicate 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 2 | |Colony 1 Replicate 2 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 2 | |Colony 2 Replicate 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 3 | |Colony 1 Replicate 3 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 3 | |Colony 2 Replicate 3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 4 | |Colony 1 Replicate 4 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 4 | |Colony 2 Replicate 4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 5 | |Colony 1 Replicate 5 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 5 | |Colony 2 Replicate 5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 6 | |Colony 1 Replicate 6 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 6 | |Colony 2 Replicate 6 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 7 | |Colony 1 Replicate 7 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 7 | |Colony 2 Replicate 7 | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Colony 1 Replicate 8 | |Colony 1 Replicate 8 | ||
|Colony 2 Replicate 8 | |Colony 2 Replicate 8 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 15 October 2019
pPGK1
This is the 1500 bp upstream of the yeast PGK1 coding region. This is a putative constitutive promoter.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
INTRODUCTION
In order to determine the strength of pPGK1 promoter, we have conducted the following experiment. First of all, we have constructed 2 plasmids where EGFP is expressed under different constitutive promoters. As a positive control, we used pTDH3. The empty plasmid was used as a negative control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmids used to conduct the experiment are listed in table 1.
Table 1. Plasmids created
Insert | |||||
number | Plasmid name | Promoter | Gene | Terminator | backbone |
1 | pRS306 pPGK1-EGFP-tCYC1 | pPGK1 | EGFP | tCYC1 | pRS306 |
2 | pRS306 | pPGK1 | |||
pRS306 |
After construction of plasmids was finished, we have transformed S. cerevisiae DOM90 (MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+]) strain with plasmids listed above to create the strains (table 2).
Table 2. S. cerevisiae strains created.
Strain name | Genotype | Plasmid integrated | |
Negative control | DOM90 | MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+] | pRS306 |
Positive control(pTDH3) | DOM90 | MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+] | pRS306 |
pPGK1 | DOM90 | MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+] | pRS306 |
We have measured the EGFP fluorescence intensity with BioTek Synergy MX microplate reader.
All strains were pregrown overnight at 30°C in liquid CSM/2%Glc media, resuspended in fresh CSM/2%Glc media to OD600 in the range of 0.8 to 1. Distributed to 96 well plate (clear flat bottom). 8 replicates from the strain were used. 200 µL of cells were added to each well. As a reference to OD600, fresh CSM/2%Glc media was used. After the 96 well plate was ready, the OD600 and fluorescence (excitation 485 nm, emission 528 nm, bandwidth 20, gain 80) were measured. The layout of the plate is described in table 3.
Table 3. The 96 well plate layout for OD600 and Fluorescence measurements.
Negative control | Positive control | pPGK1 | |
Colony 1 Replicate 1 | Colony 2 Replicate 1 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 2 | Colony 2 Replicate 2 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 3 | Colony 2 Replicate 3 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 4 | Colony 2 Replicate 4 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 5 | Colony 2 Replicate 5 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 6 | Colony 2 Replicate 6 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 7 | Colony 2 Replicate 7 | ||
Colony 1 Replicate 8 | Colony 2 Replicate 8 |
As a fluorescence reference, the standard curve of fluorescence for fluorescein concentration was generated according to 2018 iGEM InterLab Study. The only difference from the InterLab protocol was the concentration of the fluorescein used. In the InterLab study, the highest fluorescein concentration used was 10 µM. But due to the higher gain parameter used in our measurement experiment, we have used 0.313 µM to avoid out of range measurements.
CONCLUSIONS