Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2262017"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2262017 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2262017 short</partinfo> | ||
− | + | <br> | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | [[File:Composite part M-C.png|800px|thumb|center|'''Figure 1.''' P<sub>T7</sub>+RBS+M-C+terminator ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>'''Introduction'''</h1> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | M-C is a mast cell degranulating peptide [1]. The score of SCM analysis shows its promising potential to be antifungal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>'''Scoring Card Predict'''</h1> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | M-C got 387.08 from the Antifungal Scoring Card of Parabase System. The score is over 353, the threshold to divide whether a peptide has an antifungal function probability, that means M-C has a high probability to have an antifungal function. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Scoreing card M-C.png|800px|thumb|center|'''Figure 2.''' The sequence of Pe-4. <br> | ||
+ | The colors of each amino acids represent the probability of anti-fungal dipeptides. ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>'''Experiment'''</h1> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="padding:1px;font-size:16px"><b>1. Inhibition Zone </b></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | The result shows that the place we put M-C does not have little different with negative control. We cannot definitely sure if M-C can inhibit the growth of mycelium. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Inhibition zone M-C.png|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 3.''' The result shows that M-C has no obvious function on affecting the growth of mycelium.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | <p style="padding:1px;font-size:16px"><b>2. Spore Germination </b></p> | ||
+ | | ||
+ | The result shows that the spore germination percentage of non-germinating spores adding M-C with a concentration of 1000 μg/mL was higher than adding the negative control, which means the spore germination is inhibited by peptides and proves the peptides are effective. We can get the same result from adding M-C with a concentration of 500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL . | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Spore Germination.png|900px|thumb|center|'''Figure 4.''' The result shows that M-C will affect the germination of spore. ]] | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="padding:1px;font-size:14px"><b>(3) Botany Experiment </b></p> | ||
+ | | ||
+ | In order to test our anti-fungal peptides, we put M-C and negative control, double-distilled water, on the flower. The negative control is on the left and M-C is on the right. Both sides are infected with Botrytis cinerea. We checked the flower 3 days later whether the flower was affected or not. The result shows that the right side, which was spread on M-C, is not infected. It means M-C has an anti-fungal function in real plant organism. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Plant M-C.png|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 5.''' The result shows that M-C will affect fungal infection. ]] | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h1>'''Reference'''</h1> | ||
+ | [1] Argiolas A; Pisano JJ. “Isolation and characterization of two new peptides, mastoparan C and crabrolin, from the venom of the European hornet, Vespa crabro.” J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10106-11.¬ | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== |
Revision as of 15:26, 7 December 2017
T7 Promoter+RBS+M-C
Introduction
M-C is a mast cell degranulating peptide [1]. The score of SCM analysis shows its promising potential to be antifungal.
Scoring Card Predict
M-C got 387.08 from the Antifungal Scoring Card of Parabase System. The score is over 353, the threshold to divide whether a peptide has an antifungal function probability, that means M-C has a high probability to have an antifungal function.
Experiment
1. Inhibition Zone
The result shows that the place we put M-C does not have little different with negative control. We cannot definitely sure if M-C can inhibit the growth of mycelium.
2. Spore Germination
The result shows that the spore germination percentage of non-germinating spores adding M-C with a concentration of 1000 μg/mL was higher than adding the negative control, which means the spore germination is inhibited by peptides and proves the peptides are effective. We can get the same result from adding M-C with a concentration of 500 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL .
(3) Botany Experiment
In order to test our anti-fungal peptides, we put M-C and negative control, double-distilled water, on the flower. The negative control is on the left and M-C is on the right. Both sides are infected with Botrytis cinerea. We checked the flower 3 days later whether the flower was affected or not. The result shows that the right side, which was spread on M-C, is not infected. It means M-C has an anti-fungal function in real plant organism.
Reference
[1] Argiolas A; Pisano JJ. “Isolation and characterization of two new peptides, mastoparan C and crabrolin, from the venom of the European hornet, Vespa crabro.” J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10106-11.¬
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]