Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2368007"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<h1>Introduction</h1> | <h1>Introduction</h1> | ||
<p style="text-align: center"><partinfo>BBa_K2368007 short</partinfo></P> | <p style="text-align: center"><partinfo>BBa_K2368007 short</partinfo></P> | ||
− | <p> This part consists of the promoter | + | <p> This part consists of the promoter Gal1/Gal10, sweetness receptor T1R2 and the terminator CYC1. The promoter gal1/gal10 is a bi-directional galactose-inducible promoter, which requires two percent of galactose to induce twelve hours to elicit protein expression. T1R2 is the sweetness receptor of the human tongue cells belonging to C type G protein coupled receptor.</P> |
[[File:HHRR-1.png|center|500px|默认文字]] | [[File:HHRR-1.png|center|500px|默认文字]] | ||
<p style="text-align: center">Fig.1 The schematic diagram of Gal1/Gal10+T1R2+CYC1</p> | <p style="text-align: center">Fig.1 The schematic diagram of Gal1/Gal10+T1R2+CYC1</p> | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<h3>1、T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation part</h3> | <h3>1、T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation part</h3> | ||
<p>The part is about the sweeteners binding to the receptor and the GPCR produce the initial signal through changing structure. For T1R2/T1R3, we divide the process of inducing signal into four conditions of T1R2/T1R3 as show in Fig.2. And the reaction between different conditions of protein is used ODEs to describe it. The all ODEs are shown follow. </p> | <p>The part is about the sweeteners binding to the receptor and the GPCR produce the initial signal through changing structure. For T1R2/T1R3, we divide the process of inducing signal into four conditions of T1R2/T1R3 as show in Fig.2. And the reaction between different conditions of protein is used ODEs to describe it. The all ODEs are shown follow. </p> | ||
− | [[File:HHRR-2. | + | [[File:HHRR-2.png|center|500px|默认文字]] |
<p style="text-align: center">Fig.2 T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation reaction diagram</p> | <p style="text-align: center">Fig.2 T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation reaction diagram</p> | ||
− | [[File:HHRR-15. | + | [[File:HHRR-15.PNG|800px|默认文字]] |
<p>(T1R2/3: the T1R2/T1R3 heterodimer)</p> | <p>(T1R2/3: the T1R2/T1R3 heterodimer)</p> | ||
<p>The parameters of this part are listed in the Table 1.</p> | <p>The parameters of this part are listed in the Table 1.</p> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<h4>Result</h4> | <h4>Result</h4> | ||
<p>In our experiment, the T1R2 gene is used to accept the signal inputted in our whole pathway. We synthesized this part by OE PCR.</p> | <p>In our experiment, the T1R2 gene is used to accept the signal inputted in our whole pathway. We synthesized this part by OE PCR.</p> | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:微信图片 20171026230752.png|center|500px|默认文字]] |
<p style="text-align: center">Fig.5 The electrophoresis of the positive result of T1R2. | <p style="text-align: center">Fig.5 The electrophoresis of the positive result of T1R2. | ||
<p>Then the expression and location of the receptor are detected by immunofluorescence. The principle of immunofluorescence is that the antibody A binds to the tag, and then the fluorescent antibody B binds to the A. This is the positive result of our immunofluorescence.</p> | <p>Then the expression and location of the receptor are detected by immunofluorescence. The principle of immunofluorescence is that the antibody A binds to the tag, and then the fluorescent antibody B binds to the A. This is the positive result of our immunofluorescence.</p> | ||
− | [[ | + | [[File:HHRR-6.png|center|500px|默认文字]] |
<p style="text-align: center">Fig.6 Immunofluorescence of T1R2/T1R3 in yeast. The scale bars represent 10µm</p> | <p style="text-align: center">Fig.6 Immunofluorescence of T1R2/T1R3 in yeast. The scale bars represent 10µm</p> | ||
<p>As the result of combination model established, we can see the curve of RFP intensity does not increase at first 5 hours, and then the RFP intensity increases rapidly among 5-15 hours. At the same time, the differences of each ligand concentration are displayed in the middle of culture time (around at 15 hours), which is similar to our experimental data. Finally, the RFP of all groups reduce slowly after 15 hours.</p> | <p>As the result of combination model established, we can see the curve of RFP intensity does not increase at first 5 hours, and then the RFP intensity increases rapidly among 5-15 hours. At the same time, the differences of each ligand concentration are displayed in the middle of culture time (around at 15 hours), which is similar to our experimental data. Finally, the RFP of all groups reduce slowly after 15 hours.</p> | ||
− | [[ | + | [[File:HHRR-7.png|center|500px|默认文字]] |
<p style="text-align: center">Fig. 7 The fluorescence intensity of different sweeteners</p> | <p style="text-align: center">Fig. 7 The fluorescence intensity of different sweeteners</p> | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 26 October 2017
Introduction
PGal 1/10-T1R2-CYC1t
This part consists of the promoter Gal1/Gal10, sweetness receptor T1R2 and the terminator CYC1. The promoter gal1/gal10 is a bi-directional galactose-inducible promoter, which requires two percent of galactose to induce twelve hours to elicit protein expression. T1R2 is the sweetness receptor of the human tongue cells belonging to C type G protein coupled receptor.
Fig.1 The schematic diagram of Gal1/Gal10+T1R2+CYC1
Experiments
Part 1: Dry experiments of T1R2
1、T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation part
The part is about the sweeteners binding to the receptor and the GPCR produce the initial signal through changing structure. For T1R2/T1R3, we divide the process of inducing signal into four conditions of T1R2/T1R3 as show in Fig.2. And the reaction between different conditions of protein is used ODEs to describe it. The all ODEs are shown follow.
Fig.2 T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation reaction diagram
(T1R2/3: the T1R2/T1R3 heterodimer)
The parameters of this part are listed in the Table 1.
Table 1. The value of parameter in T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation part
The output of the T1R2/T1R3 receptor activation part is showed. (Fig.3)
Fig. 3 The output signal, activated state of T1R2/T1R3, induced by different concentration ligand
As we can see, the activated state of T1R2/T1R3 establishes clear distant under different concentration of ligand for binding. It can prove that this pathway can sense different strength of signal and the signal will decrease soon, which means our system will have less signal interfere.
2、The result of T1R2 expression
As the result of combination model established, we can see the curve of RFP intensity does not increase at first 5 hours, and then the RFP intensity increases rapidly among 5-15 hours. At the same time, the differences of each ligand concentration are displayed in the middle of culture time (around at 15 hours), which is similar to our experimental data. Finally, the RFP of all groups reduce slowly.
Fig. 4 The simulation result of RFP intensity in population level.
Part 2: Wet experiments of T1R2
Design
We construct the part by Overlap Extension PCR. And the Gal1/Gal10 promoter and the Cyc1t terminator stem from the PESC-Ura plasmid.
Result
In our experiment, the T1R2 gene is used to accept the signal inputted in our whole pathway. We synthesized this part by OE PCR.
Fig.5 The electrophoresis of the positive result of T1R2. <p>Then the expression and location of the receptor are detected by immunofluorescence. The principle of immunofluorescence is that the antibody A binds to the tag, and then the fluorescent antibody B binds to the A. This is the positive result of our immunofluorescence.
Fig.6 Immunofluorescence of T1R2/T1R3 in yeast. The scale bars represent 10µm
As the result of combination model established, we can see the curve of RFP intensity does not increase at first 5 hours, and then the RFP intensity increases rapidly among 5-15 hours. At the same time, the differences of each ligand concentration are displayed in the middle of culture time (around at 15 hours), which is similar to our experimental data. Finally, the RFP of all groups reduce slowly after 15 hours.
Fig. 7 The fluorescence intensity of different sweeteners
[1] Morini G, Bassoli A, Temussi P A. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2005, 48(17):5520-9.
[2] Neumoin A, Cohen L S, Arshava B, et al. Biophysical Journal, 2009, 96(8):3187-3196.
[3] Bohlmann L, Tredwell G D, Yu X, et al. Nature Chemical Biology, 2015, 11(12):955.
[4] Dubois G E. Molecular mechanism of sweetness sensation.[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2016, 164(Pt B):453.
[5] Kofahl B, Klipp E. Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway.[J]. Yeast, 2004, 21(10):831.
[6] Richardson, Kathryn. Mechanisms of GPCR signal regulation in fission yeast[J]. University of Warwick, 2014.
[7] Nie Y, Vigues S, Hobbs J R, et al. Distinct contributions of T1R2 and T1R3 taste receptor subunits to the detection of sweet stimuli.[J]. Current Biology Cb, 2005, 15(21):1948-52.
[8] Audet M, Bouvier M. Restructuring G-Protein- Coupled Receptor Activation[J]. Cell, 2012, 151(1):14-23.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1369
Illegal BglII site found at 1789
Illegal BglII site found at 1951
Illegal XhoI site found at 396 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 880
Illegal AgeI site found at 2098 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]