Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2130000"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<p>Our results showed that RuvCIII-2 which is highly dynamic can be deleted while RuvCIII-1 couldn't. RuvCIII-2 deletion can be combined with the HNH deletion producing a truncated version of more than 60% of activity.</p> | <p>Our results showed that RuvCIII-2 which is highly dynamic can be deleted while RuvCIII-1 couldn't. RuvCIII-2 deletion can be combined with the HNH deletion producing a truncated version of more than 60% of activity.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e2/T--NTU-Singapore--conclusion.png" height="60%"width="75%"> | ||
+ | <p>We then compared our ∆HNH∆RuvCIII-2 dCas9 with other truncation. This part still has stronger activation strength than the ∆REC2∆HNH mutant although with an extra of ~200bp.</p> | ||
− | |||
</center></html> | </center></html> |
Revision as of 11:00, 29 October 2016
∆RuvCIII-2 ∆HNH Sp-dCas9
dCas9 is a catalytically inactive Cas9, which still retains it's ability to bind to DNA. For epigenetic regulation, the dCas9 is highly dependent upon the function of it's fusion partner. For this part, we have deleted the HNH domain as well as the RuvCIII-2 region of the SP-dCas9 and tested it's binding capability by assessing the strength in transcriptional activation via by tagging it with a VP64-p65-Rta tripartite activator. A GFP reporter, BBa_K2130003 with two dCas9 binding site was used to measure the strength of the truncated dCss9.
Conformation of dCas9 before and after non-targeted strand cleavage. In state B, there are several regions (highlighted purple in state A), that are unresolved which points out that these regions are very dynamic and is not important for DNA interaction. We named this dynamic region as RuvCIII-2. On the other hand, RuvCIII-1(colored in cyan) also has minimal contact with DNA.
Our results showed that RuvCIII-2 which is highly dynamic can be deleted while RuvCIII-1 couldn't. RuvCIII-2 deletion can be combined with the HNH deletion producing a truncated version of more than 60% of activity.
We then compared our ∆HNH∆RuvCIII-2 dCas9 with other truncation. This part still has stronger activation strength than the ∆REC2∆HNH mutant although with an extra of ~200bp.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 251
Illegal BglII site found at 1188
Illegal BamHI site found at 2006
Illegal XhoI site found at 2962 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2350
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 2496
Illegal BsaI site found at 3158
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1411