Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa C0170:Experience"

Revision as of 05:14, 24 October 2016

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_C0170

Characterization of BBa_C0170-Arizona_State 2016

Authors: Ernesto Luna, Brady Dennison, Cassandra Barrett, Jimmy Xu, Jiaqi Wu, Dr. Karmella Haynes

Our team helped increase characterization of the part Bba_C0170(RhlI). This part was tested against its ability to induce the part BBa_F2620 by the Canton Lab(MIT). This part outputs PoPS as a Receiver Device combined with LuxR. An induction test on BBa_F2620 had been done by Dr. Barry Canton (2008), but they tested GFP production over various AHL concentrations, while our test was an 8-hour GFP read over time for 2 AHL concentrations (10 and 50%). In addition, the Canton test utilized synthetic AHLs while our test utilized AHLs produced via an E.coli chassis. A visual induction test was also done, plating the Sender alongside a GFP positive control, negative receiver control, and F2620.

As shown below, Rhl was able to induce F2620 in this visual induction, as colonies in the top right section did produce GFP. This was a lower level of induction, so although crosstalk may occur, it is minimal.

Plate with GFP+(top left), Sender(center), -Receiver(bottom) and F2620(top right)

The figure below compares RhlI at 10% and 50% concentrations alongside the native AHL system LuxI at 10% and 50% concentrations. RhlI is shown to induce F2620, but to a much lesser degree than LuxI. This affirms that F2620 is capable of being induced by RhlI synthesized within BL21(DE3) E. coli, supporting the notion that crosstalk is occurring. This result is supported by the plate induction result, as both indicate that a low degree of crosstalk will occur between F2620 and RhlI.

GFP absorbance from RhlI over time

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that RhlI was able to induce F2620 after being extracted to a minimal degree. These results were consistent across both the visual plate induction and the 8-hour plate read. Because RhlI is capable of inducing F2620, the Rhl and Lux systems cannot be characterized as orthogonal systems, which may limit its use in any constructed genetic circuits.

User Reviews

UNIQ1fc49dae0aac1468-partinfo-00000000-QINU

Antiquity

This review comes from the old result system and indicates that this part did not work in some test.

UNIQ1fc49dae0aac1468-partinfo-00000002-QINU

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Our team helped increase characterization of the part Bba_C0170(RhlI). This part was tested against its ability to induce the part BBa_F2620 by the Canton Lab(MIT). This part outputs PoPS as a Receiver Device combined with LuxR. An induction test on BBa_F2620 had been done by Dr. Barry Canton (2008), but they tested GFP production over various AHL concentrations, while our test was an 8-hour GFP read over time for 2 AHL concentrations (10 and 50%). In addition, the Canton test utilized synthetic AHLs while our test utilized AHLs produced via an E.coli chassis. A visual induction test was also done, plating the Sender alongside a GFP positive control, negative receiver control, and F2620.
-As shown below, Rhl was able to induce F2620 in this visual induction, as colonies in the top right section did not produce GFP. This was a lower level of induction, so although crosstalk may occur, it is minimal.
+As shown below, Rhl was able to induce F2620 in this visual induction, as colonies in the top right section did produce GFP. This was a lower level of induction, so although crosstalk may occur, it is minimal.
 <div style="text-align: center;">[[File:T--Arizona_State--rhlplate.png]]</div>
 <div style="text-align: center;">Plate with GFP+(top left), Sender(center), -Receiver(bottom) and F2620(top right)</div>