Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K907000"

(edit by Lukas)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<li>'''Group:''' ETH Zurich 2016
 
<li>'''Group:''' ETH Zurich 2016
 
<li>'''Author:''' Asli Azizoglu
 
<li>'''Author:''' Asli Azizoglu
<li>'''Summary:''' We cloned and characterised a codon optimised bxb1 for <i>E.coli</i>, and sent it to the registry as
+
<li>'''Summary:''' We cloned and characterised a codon optimised bxb1 for <i>E. coli</i>, and sent it to the registry as
a biobrick. Our biobrick can be found here with a fast degradation tag and here without any degradation
+
a biobrick. Our biobrick can be found with a fast degradation tag [[BBa_K2116009]] and here without any degradation
tags[[Part:BBa_K2116026]]. The non-codon optimised version can be found here [[Part:BBa_K907000]].
+
tag [[Part:BBa_K2116026]]. The non-codon optimised version can be found here [[Part:BBa_K907000]]. Besides some favorable features, the codon optimized bxb1 also supports full assembly compatibility.
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  
Line 16: Line 16:
 
<h2>Genetic Design</h2>
 
<h2>Genetic Design</h2>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li> Bxb1 was expressed under a tet promoter, without any degradation tags. The RBS has a strenght of 1209.69 au (translation
+
<li> Bxb1 was expressed under a tet promoter, without any degradation tag [[Part:BBa_K2116056]]. The RBS has a strength of 1209.69 au (translation
rate), as calculated by the [https://salislab.net/software/ Salis RBS Calculator]. This construct was cloned on a medium
+
rate), as calculated by the [https://salislab.net/software/Salis RBS Calculator]. This construct was cloned on a medium
 
copy plasmid with the p15A replication of origin.
 
copy plasmid with the p15A replication of origin.
 
<li> TetR was expressed under the control of medium-strength constitutive promoter [[Part:Bba_J23118]], and cloned onto a
 
<li> TetR was expressed under the control of medium-strength constitutive promoter [[Part:Bba_J23118]], and cloned onto a
 
low copy plasmid with pSC101/Rep101 replication of origin.
 
low copy plasmid with pSC101/Rep101 replication of origin.
<li> We also constructed a dual fluorescence reporter system [[Part:BBa_K2116024]] that expresses GFP when bxb1 flips a directional
+
<li> We also constructed a dual fluorescence reporter system [[Part:BBa_K2116024]] that expresses sfGFP [[Part:BBa_K2116017]] when bxb1 flips a directional
promoter.
+
promoter. In the non-flipped state the reporter expresses the red fluorescent protein mNectarine [[Part:BBa_K2116016]].
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<h2 id="experimental_setup"> Experimental Setup </h2>
 
<h2 id="experimental_setup"> Experimental Setup </h2>
Line 28: Line 28:
 
<li> The test construct with bxb1 was transformed together with the reporter construct, and either with TetR or with the empty
 
<li> The test construct with bxb1 was transformed together with the reporter construct, and either with TetR or with the empty
 
backbone as <b>control</b>.
 
backbone as <b>control</b>.
<li> Cells were grown in LB medium for 4 hours, and then transfered to minimal M9 medium with a 1:100 dilution. aTc was added
+
<li> Cells were grown in LB medium for 4 hours, and then transfered to minimal M9 medium with a 1:100 dilution and grown over-night. The culture was again diluted 1:100 in minimal M9 medium the next day. aTc was added
 
at given concentrations at OD<sub>600</sub>. Samples were taken at the specified time points, spun down and resuspended
 
at given concentrations at OD<sub>600</sub>. Samples were taken at the specified time points, spun down and resuspended
 
in PBS at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.01 and kept on ice until measurement.
 
in PBS at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.01 and kept on ice until measurement.
Line 36: Line 36:
 
<h2>Results</h2>
 
<h2>Results</h2>
 
<p>We observed that maximum flipping is reached at around 8h under these conditions. The response correlates with aTc concentration.
 
<p>We observed that maximum flipping is reached at around 8h under these conditions. The response correlates with aTc concentration.
However compared to the control, where there is no TetR, we see 6-fold less flipping. This could be improved by increasing
+
However, compared to the control, where there is no TetR, we see 6-fold less flipping. This could be improved by increasing
the concentration of aTc, however we have found that at 8000 ng/μL cell growth was inhibited.</p>
+
the concentration of aTc, however we have found that at 8000 ng/mL cell growth was inhibited.</p>
  
 
[[File:T--ETH Zurich--bxb1kineticsfull.png|500px|thumb|center|Time and dose response of bxb1 flipping a directional promoter.
 
[[File:T--ETH Zurich--bxb1kineticsfull.png|500px|thumb|center|Time and dose response of bxb1 flipping a directional promoter.
Line 45: Line 45:
 
<h1> Comparison between Codon Optimised and Registry Bxb1 Integrase </h1>
 
<h1> Comparison between Codon Optimised and Registry Bxb1 Integrase </h1>
 
<p>We compared the kinetics of our codon optimised bxb1 [[Part:BBa_K2116026]] and the one found previously on the registry
 
<p>We compared the kinetics of our codon optimised bxb1 [[Part:BBa_K2116026]] and the one found previously on the registry
[[Part:BBa_K907000]] that was not codon optimised. The same genetic and experimental setup was used as above. The only
+
[[Part:BBa_K907000]] that was not codon optimized. The same genetic and experimental setup was used as above. The only
 
difference between the two constructs is that the non-codon optimised bxb1 has a weaker RBS, with a strength of 251.82au
 
difference between the two constructs is that the non-codon optimised bxb1 has a weaker RBS, with a strength of 251.82au
 
(translation rate), as calculated by the [[https://salislab.net/software Salis RBS Calculator]]. Due to this difference
 
(translation rate), as calculated by the [[https://salislab.net/software Salis RBS Calculator]]. Due to this difference
 
in construction we compared each bxb1 to it's own control (see above, [[#experimental_setup|Experimental Setup]]).</p>
 
in construction we compared each bxb1 to it's own control (see above, [[#experimental_setup|Experimental Setup]]).</p>
 
<p> We could show that the codon optimised bxb1 could reach ~1/6th flipping compared to control, whereas the non-codon optimised
 
<p> We could show that the codon optimised bxb1 could reach ~1/6th flipping compared to control, whereas the non-codon optimised
one reached only ~1/260th of its own control. We thus argue that the codon optimised bxb1 is more efficient, especially
+
one reached only ~1/260th of its own control. We thus argue that the codon optimized bxb1 is more efficient, especially
since the fold increase in efficiency is a lot more than the fold increase in RBS strenght. </p>
+
since the fold increase in efficiency is a lot more than the fold increase in RBS strength. </p>
  
 
[[File:T--ETH Zurich--codonoptimisation.png|500px|thumb|center|Comparison of codon optimised and non-optimised bxb1 flipping
 
[[File:T--ETH Zurich--codonoptimisation.png|500px|thumb|center|Comparison of codon optimised and non-optimised bxb1 flipping
 
efficiency. Test constructs have bxb1 expressed under the Tet promoter, with TetR present in the system. Control doesn't
 
efficiency. Test constructs have bxb1 expressed under the Tet promoter, with TetR present in the system. Control doesn't
 
have TetR in the system, and thus constitutively expresses bxb1. While non-codon optimised bxb1 can only reach ~1/260th
 
have TetR in the system, and thus constitutively expresses bxb1. While non-codon optimised bxb1 can only reach ~1/260th
of the full flipping reached by control, the codon optimised one reaches ~1/6th of its own control. Induction at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.5 with 2000ng/μL. Data measured by flow cytometry at 16h. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars
+
of the full flipping reached by control, the codon optimised one reaches ~1/6th of its own control. Induction at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.5 with 2000ng/mL. Data measured by flow cytometry at 16h. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars
 
indicate SEM. ]]
 
indicate SEM. ]]
  

Revision as of 11:13, 24 October 2016

Mycobacterium Phage Bxb1 gp35, DNA integrase


  • Group: ETH Zurich 2016
  • Author: Asli Azizoglu
  • Summary: We cloned and characterised a codon optimised bxb1 for E. coli, and sent it to the registry as a biobrick. Our biobrick can be found with a fast degradation tag BBa_K2116009 and here without any degradation tag Part:BBa_K2116026. The non-codon optimised version can be found here Part:BBa_K907000. Besides some favorable features, the codon optimized bxb1 also supports full assembly compatibility.

Kinetic Characterisation

We investigated the kinetics of bxb1 flipping using flow cytometry.

Genetic Design

  • Bxb1 was expressed under a tet promoter, without any degradation tag Part:BBa_K2116056. The RBS has a strength of 1209.69 au (translation rate), as calculated by the RBS Calculator. This construct was cloned on a medium copy plasmid with the p15A replication of origin.
  • TetR was expressed under the control of medium-strength constitutive promoter Part:Bba_J23118, and cloned onto a low copy plasmid with pSC101/Rep101 replication of origin.
  • We also constructed a dual fluorescence reporter system Part:BBa_K2116024 that expresses sfGFP Part:BBa_K2116017 when bxb1 flips a directional promoter. In the non-flipped state the reporter expresses the red fluorescent protein mNectarine Part:BBa_K2116016.

Experimental Setup

  • The test construct with bxb1 was transformed together with the reporter construct, and either with TetR or with the empty backbone as control.
  • Cells were grown in LB medium for 4 hours, and then transfered to minimal M9 medium with a 1:100 dilution and grown over-night. The culture was again diluted 1:100 in minimal M9 medium the next day. aTc was added at given concentrations at OD600. Samples were taken at the specified time points, spun down and resuspended in PBS at OD600 0.01 and kept on ice until measurement.
  • Results are presented as mean fluorescence per cell and the standard error of the mean.

Results

We observed that maximum flipping is reached at around 8h under these conditions. The response correlates with aTc concentration. However, compared to the control, where there is no TetR, we see 6-fold less flipping. This could be improved by increasing the concentration of aTc, however we have found that at 8000 ng/mL cell growth was inhibited.

Time and dose response of bxb1 flipping a directional promoter. Induction at OD600 0.5 with aTc at given concentrations. Data measured by flow cytometry at given time points. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars indicate SEM.

Comparison between Codon Optimised and Registry Bxb1 Integrase

We compared the kinetics of our codon optimised bxb1 Part:BBa_K2116026 and the one found previously on the registry Part:BBa_K907000 that was not codon optimized. The same genetic and experimental setup was used as above. The only difference between the two constructs is that the non-codon optimised bxb1 has a weaker RBS, with a strength of 251.82au (translation rate), as calculated by the [Salis RBS Calculator]. Due to this difference in construction we compared each bxb1 to it's own control (see above, Experimental Setup).

We could show that the codon optimised bxb1 could reach ~1/6th flipping compared to control, whereas the non-codon optimised one reached only ~1/260th of its own control. We thus argue that the codon optimized bxb1 is more efficient, especially since the fold increase in efficiency is a lot more than the fold increase in RBS strength.

Comparison of codon optimised and non-optimised bxb1 flipping efficiency. Test constructs have bxb1 expressed under the Tet promoter, with TetR present in the system. Control doesn't have TetR in the system, and thus constitutively expresses bxb1. While non-codon optimised bxb1 can only reach ~1/260th of the full flipping reached by control, the codon optimised one reaches ~1/6th of its own control. Induction at OD600 0.5 with 2000ng/mL. Data measured by flow cytometry at 16h. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars indicate SEM.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 192
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 466
    Illegal XhoI site found at 553
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1105
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1192
    Illegal AgeI site found at 242
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1300