Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1974012"
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Pantide-expressed E. coli Rosetta gami strain and diluted it with the three concentration.We applied the sample onto the leaf disks and put five cutworms into the separate cabinets for feeding assays. The positive control in the experiment was to apply Bacillus thuringiensis, which is the most widely-used bioinsecticide. We preserved all the result of the remained leaves sealing with the glass paper and calculated the ratio of the remained area on the leaves. The collected data were analyzed by t – test. Here are the feeding assay results. | Pantide-expressed E. coli Rosetta gami strain and diluted it with the three concentration.We applied the sample onto the leaf disks and put five cutworms into the separate cabinets for feeding assays. The positive control in the experiment was to apply Bacillus thuringiensis, which is the most widely-used bioinsecticide. We preserved all the result of the remained leaves sealing with the glass paper and calculated the ratio of the remained area on the leaves. The collected data were analyzed by t – test. Here are the feeding assay results. | ||
[[File:NCTU_DOSE_S_2.png|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 8.'''Below are leaves with of Negative control ( DDwater ), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a+linker+His-Tag, Sf1a+linker+snowdrop-lectin+linker+His-Tag]] | [[File:NCTU_DOSE_S_2.png|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 8.'''Below are leaves with of Negative control ( DDwater ), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a+linker+His-Tag, Sf1a+linker+snowdrop-lectin+linker+His-Tag]] | ||
− | [[File:NCTU FORMOSA S2 .jpg|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 9.'''Below are leaves with of Negative control ( DDwater ), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a | + | [[File:NCTU FORMOSA S2 .jpg|400px|thumb|center|'''Figure 9.'''Below are leaves with of Negative control ( DDwater ), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a+linker+His-Tag]] |
<!--Don't touch--> | <!--Don't touch--> |
Revision as of 21:43, 19 October 2016
T7Promoter+RBS+Sf1a+linker+6X His-Tag
Introduction:
By ligating the IPTG induced PT7(BBa_ I712074), strong ribosome binding site (BBa_B0034), sf1a, linker, and the 6xHistag (BBa_ K1223006), we can express Sf1a, the toxin by IPTG induction
.
This year we create a revolutionary system that integrates biological pesticides, an automatic detector, a sprinkler, and IoT. We made a database that contains most of the spider toxins and selected the target toxins by programming. U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a is coded for the venom of a spider, Segestria florentina. It is under the control of the strong PT7. A 6xHistag is added for further protein purification.
Mechanism of Sf1a
U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a has a structure called ICK(inhibitor cysteine knot). This kind of structure contains four disulfide bonds. With this structure, Sf1a can resist the high temperature, acid-base solution and the digest juice of insect gut. Sf1a can bind on insect voltage-gated sodium channel Site-1, making it paralyze and die eventually.
Features of Sf1a
1. Non-toxic: U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a is non-toxic to mammals and bees. Since the structure of the target ion channel is different, U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a does not harm mammals and bees. So it is safe to use it as a biological pesticide.
2. Biodegradable: The toxin is a peptide, so it must degrade over time. After degradation, the toxin will become nutrition in the soil.
3. Species-specific:According to reference, U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a has specificity to Lepidopteran (moths) and Dipteran (flies). So another insect such as bees will not be killed.
4. Eco-friendly: Compare with a chemical pesticide, U2-segestritoxin-Sf1a will not remain in soil and water so that it will not pollute the environment and won’t harm the ecosystem.
Together, using Sf1a is totally an environmentally friendly way for solving harmful insect problems by using this ion channel inhibitor as a biological pesticide.
Target insect:
Experiment
1. Cloning :
After assembling the DNA sequences from the basic parts, we recombined each PT7+B0034+Sf1a +linker+6xHistag gene to pSB1C3 backbones and conducted a PCR experiment to check the size of each part. The DNA sequence length of these parts is around 250-500 b.p. In this PCR experiment, the toxin product's size should be near at 450-700 b.p.
2. Expressing:
E.coli(DE3) express the protein and form the disulfide in the cytoplasm. We sonicated the bacteria and purified the protein by 6xHis-tag behind the toxin using Nickel resin column.
3. Analysis:
We do the Bradford analysis to get the protein concentration.
4.Modeling:
According to reference, the energy of Ultraviolet will break the disulfide bonds and the toxicity is also decreased. To take the parameter into consideration for our automatic system, we modeled the degradation rate of the protein and modified the program in our device.Therefore PANTIDE was be test under the Ultraviolet and model the degradation rate. the Protein Electrophoresis was showed below.
[[File:|NCTU FORMOSA S2 .jpg|400px|thumb|center|Figure 7.]]
5. Device:
We designed a device that contains a detector, a sprinkler, and an integrated hardware with users by APP through IoT talk. We use an infrared detector to detect the number of the pest and predict what time to spray the farmland. Furthermore, other detectors like temperature, humidity, lamination, pressure of carbon dioxide are also installed in our device. At the same time, the APP that displays all the information about the farmland would contact the users and spray biological pesticides automatically. This device can make farmers control the farmland remotely.
Results
Pantide-expressed E. coli Rosetta gami strain and diluted it with the three concentration.We applied the sample onto the leaf disks and put five cutworms into the separate cabinets for feeding assays. The positive control in the experiment was to apply Bacillus thuringiensis, which is the most widely-used bioinsecticide. We preserved all the result of the remained leaves sealing with the glass paper and calculated the ratio of the remained area on the leaves. The collected data were analyzed by t – test. Here are the feeding assay results.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]