Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa B0034"
(→Usage and Biology) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
| + | William and Mary iGEM 2016 | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/58/T--William_and_Mary--RBS_Characterization_Curves.png | ||
| + | |||
| + | We characterized the Anderson RBS library to better understand the strengths of each RBS under different induction conditions | ||
| + | |||
== IIT Madras 2016's Characterization == | == IIT Madras 2016's Characterization == | ||
[[Image:Nonmodularity_of_B343230.png|400px|right|Characterization of popular BioBrick RBSs]] | [[Image:Nonmodularity_of_B343230.png|400px|right|Characterization of popular BioBrick RBSs]] | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 19 October 2016
RBS (Elowitz 1999) -- defines RBS efficiency
RBS based on Elowitz repressilator.
Usage and Biology
William and Mary iGEM 2016
We characterized the Anderson RBS library to better understand the strengths of each RBS under different induction conditions
IIT Madras 2016's Characterization
Modelling
Global non-modularity towards promoters & protein coding parts and relative strength was estimated for RBSs B0030, B0032, B0034 in our [http://2016.igem.org/Team:IIT-Madras/Model#Modularity_of_RBS_parts modelling]
Experimentation
Biobrick RBSs B0030, B0031, B0032, B0034 were used in our 'Noise in Device' experiment to understand the role of RBS parts in giving rise to noise.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Functional Parameters
| biology | -NA- |
| efficiency | 1 |
Note: The Elowitz RBS is the definition of efficiency 1.0.