Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1899005:Experience"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Applications of BBa_K1899005=== | ===Applications of BBa_K1899005=== | ||
| + | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/2/25/Comparison_of_the_Strength_of_tetR_and_PhlFp.jpeg/748px-Comparison_of_the_Strength_of_tetR_and_PhlFp.jpeg | ||
| + | <b>Fig a) Comparison of Technical Triplicate Results of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240 and pSB3K3-<i>PhlFp</i>(<bbpart>_BBa_K1899004_ BBa_E0240</b> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fold change between pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240 and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240) and that of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240 is around 13.2 times and 7.01 times respectively. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is due to the toxicity of BBa_C0040(TetR). The toxicity reduces the growth rate of the E. coli containing this plasmid. The strong promoter BBa_J23101 makes this effect more significant when doing the characterisation. Though the data are collected with all OD within the mid-log range, there is still a distance between them, making a significant difference in the RFU. It is ungrounded to say TetR interferes the functionality of PhlFp at this stage. | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
Revision as of 12:50, 17 October 2016
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K1899005
Fig a) Comparison of Technical Triplicate Results of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240 and pSB3K3-PhlFp(_BBa_K1899004_