Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1758325"
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1758325 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1758325 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 +
 +
===Results===
 +
<html>
 +
 +
<h2><i>in vivo</i></h2>
 +
<p>Our sensor for copper detection consists of CueR a MerR like activator and the copper specific promoter <i>copAP</i>. The promoter is regulated by CueR, which binds Cu <sup>2+</sup>-ions. We also used a sfGFP downstream the promoter for detection through a fluorescence signal.</p>
 +
 +
<p>For our copper sensor we used the native operator of cooper homeostasis from <i>E.coli</i> K12. We constructed a part(<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758324" target="_blank">BBa_K1758324</a>) using the basic genetic structur showed in <a href="http://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/HeavyMetals" target="_blank">Our biosensors</a>.The operator sequence, which includes the promoter (<i>copAP</i>),  is regulated by the activator CueR. In BBa_K1758324 we combined a codon optimized version of <i>cueR</i> (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758320" target="_blank">BBa_K1758320</a>) under the control of a constitutive promoter with  sfGFP under the control of the corresponding promoter <i>copAP</i>  (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758321" target="_blank">BBa_K1758321</a>)(figure 2). Through the addition of a 5’UTR before the sfGFP we optimized the expression of sfGFP and increased fluorescence. </p>
 +
 +
     
 +
  <figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b2/Bielefeld-CebiTec_in_vivo_Copper.jpeg" width="90%"><figcaption>Figure 2: The concept of our <i>in vivo</i> copper sensor (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758324" target="_blank">BBa_K1758324</a>), which consists of the activator under the control of a constitutive promoter (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758320" target="_blank">BBa_K1758320</a>) and the operator and promoter sequence of the copper inducible promoter. An untranslated region in front of the sfGFP, which is used for detection, enhances its expression (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758323" target="_blank">BBa_K1758323</a>). </figcaption>
 +
</figure>     
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/90/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_copper.jpg" width="90%"> <figcaption>Figure 3: Time course of the induction of a copper biosensor with sfGFP for different copper concentrations <i>in vivo</i>. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD<sub>600</sub>. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4e/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_copper_Balkendiagramm.jpeg" width="90%"></a>
 +
<figcaption>Figure 4: Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. </figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<p>We tested our <i>in vivo</i> ccopper sensor with sfGFP as reporter gene, to test the functionality of the system. Moreover we tested different copper concentrations. The kinetic of our sensors response to different copper concentrations is shown in figure 3. The first 10 hours show a strong increase in fluorescence. After that the increase in fluorescence is slower. For better visualization the kinetics of figure 3 are represented as bars in figure 4. A fluorescence level difference for 60 min, 150 min and 650 min is represented.</p>
 +
 +
 +
<p><i>In vivo</i> we could show that the adding different concentrations of copper has effects on the transcription levels of sfGFP.</p>
 +
 +
<p>The shown data suggest that sensing copper with our device is possible even if the detectable concentrations are higher than the desireble sensitivity limits. Therfore we tested the copper sensor in our <i>in vitro</i> transcription translation approach.</p>
 +
 +
<p>Our sensors were cultivated in the BioLector. Due to the accuracy of this device we could measure our sample in duplicates.</br></br>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/90/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_copper.jpg" width="90%"></a>
 +
<figcaption>Time course of the induction of a copper biosensor with sfGFP for different copper concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<p><i>In vivo</i> we could show that the adding different concentrations of copper has effects on the transcription levels of sfGFP.</p>
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4e/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_copper_Balkendiagramm.jpeg" width="90%">
 +
<figcaption>Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<p>The shown data suggest that sensing copper with our device is possible even if the detectable concentrations are higher than the desireble sensitivity limits. Therfore we tested the copper sensor in our <a href="http://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/HeavyMetals" ><i>in vitro</i> transcription translation approach.</a> </p>

Revision as of 05:48, 19 September 2015

Copper responsive promoter with T7-promoter and UTR-sfGFP

Copper induceble promoter under the control of a T7 with 5´untranslated region infront of a sfGFP wich is used for detection via fluorescence


Usage and Biology

This part is essential for our in vitro characterization of our copper sensor. The edition of T7 promoter to BBa_K1758323 enables us to characterize tihs sensor in our CFPS.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 29
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 179


Results

in vivo

Our sensor for copper detection consists of CueR a MerR like activator and the copper specific promoter copAP. The promoter is regulated by CueR, which binds Cu 2+-ions. We also used a sfGFP downstream the promoter for detection through a fluorescence signal.

For our copper sensor we used the native operator of cooper homeostasis from E.coli K12. We constructed a part(BBa_K1758324) using the basic genetic structur showed in Our biosensors.The operator sequence, which includes the promoter (copAP), is regulated by the activator CueR. In BBa_K1758324 we combined a codon optimized version of cueR (BBa_K1758320) under the control of a constitutive promoter with sfGFP under the control of the corresponding promoter copAP (BBa_K1758321)(figure 2). Through the addition of a 5’UTR before the sfGFP we optimized the expression of sfGFP and increased fluorescence.

Figure 2: The concept of our in vivo copper sensor (BBa_K1758324), which consists of the activator under the control of a constitutive promoter (BBa_K1758320) and the operator and promoter sequence of the copper inducible promoter. An untranslated region in front of the sfGFP, which is used for detection, enhances its expression (BBa_K1758323).
Figure 3: Time course of the induction of a copper biosensor with sfGFP for different copper concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.
Figure 4: Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes.

We tested our in vivo ccopper sensor with sfGFP as reporter gene, to test the functionality of the system. Moreover we tested different copper concentrations. The kinetic of our sensors response to different copper concentrations is shown in figure 3. The first 10 hours show a strong increase in fluorescence. After that the increase in fluorescence is slower. For better visualization the kinetics of figure 3 are represented as bars in figure 4. A fluorescence level difference for 60 min, 150 min and 650 min is represented.

In vivo we could show that the adding different concentrations of copper has effects on the transcription levels of sfGFP.

The shown data suggest that sensing copper with our device is possible even if the detectable concentrations are higher than the desireble sensitivity limits. Therfore we tested the copper sensor in our in vitro transcription translation approach.

Our sensors were cultivated in the BioLector. Due to the accuracy of this device we could measure our sample in duplicates.

Time course of the induction of a copper biosensor with sfGFP for different copper concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.

In vivo we could show that the adding different concentrations of copper has effects on the transcription levels of sfGFP.

Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes.

The shown data suggest that sensing copper with our device is possible even if the detectable concentrations are higher than the desireble sensitivity limits. Therfore we tested the copper sensor in our in vitro transcription translation approach.