Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa M36689:Experience"
(→Applications of BBa_M36689) |
(→Applications of BBa_M36689) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
All wells showed a strong band at 170 bp, which corresponds to the expected band size. However, presence of the same band in all 6 wells, including well I which had no plasmid and well VI, which had the pocket plasmid, suggests contamination or other unexpected result. | All wells showed a strong band at 170 bp, which corresponds to the expected band size. However, presence of the same band in all 6 wells, including well I which had no plasmid and well VI, which had the pocket plasmid, suggests contamination or other unexpected result. | ||
| − | [[Gel.jpg]] | + | [[File:Gel.jpg]] |
Fluorescence Microscopy Images: | Fluorescence Microscopy Images: | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis | Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis | ||
For each image taken using the GFP filter set, we analyzed individual cells exhibiting fluorescence and analyzed their intensities using Image J Software. In order to quantitatively determine this, we adjusted for corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) using the following formula: CTCF = Integrated Density - (Area of Cell * Mean Background Fluorescence Reading). This was done for each heat shock experimental sample condition for our “Experimental” samples. These values were then averaged. We used a two-tailed, unpaired t test to determine significance. | For each image taken using the GFP filter set, we analyzed individual cells exhibiting fluorescence and analyzed their intensities using Image J Software. In order to quantitatively determine this, we adjusted for corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) using the following formula: CTCF = Integrated Density - (Area of Cell * Mean Background Fluorescence Reading). This was done for each heat shock experimental sample condition for our “Experimental” samples. These values were then averaged. We used a two-tailed, unpaired t test to determine significance. | ||
| − | + | [[File:SARF_Microscopy_Image_J_analysis]] | |
[[File:Microscopy_analysis.png]] | [[File:Microscopy_analysis.png]] | ||
| + | |||
Plate Reader Data | Plate Reader Data | ||
Revision as of 02:09, 13 December 2014
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_M36689
RT-PCR Gel: Wells: Using a KB+ ladder I: Plate A, "Mock transfection", negative control II: Plate AA, Experimental HS-Rec Plasmid III: Plate B, Exprimental HS-Rec Plasmid IV: Plate C, Experimental HS-Rec Plasmid V: Plate D, Experimental HS-Rec Plasmid VI: Plate F, Postitive control pComet plasmid All wells showed a strong band at 170 bp, which corresponds to the expected band size. However, presence of the same band in all 6 wells, including well I which had no plasmid and well VI, which had the pocket plasmid, suggests contamination or other unexpected result.
Fluorescence Microscopy Images: 1: Post Heat shock, 1 hr 42˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 2: Post Heat shock, 1 hr 45˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 3: Post Heat shock, 2 hr 42˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 4: Post Heat shock, 2 hr 42˚C pComet Postive Control 5: Post Heat shock, 2 hr 45˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 6: Pre Heat shock, 2 hr 45˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 7: Pre Heat shock, 1 hr 45˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 8: Pre Heat shock, 2 hr 42˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 9: Pre Heat shock, 2 hr 45˚C pComet Positive Control 10: Pre Heat shock, 1 hr 42˚C HS-Rec Plasmid 11: Pre Heat shock, 2 hr 42˚C Mock transfection Negative Control
1. File:After1hr42CExpt.tif 2. File:After1hr45CExpt124ce1f5.tif 3. File:After2hr42CExpt.tif 4. File:After+2hr42C 124bp1f1.tif 5. File:After2hrs45CExpt 124de2f5.tif 6. File:Before2hr45CExpt 123de2f4.tif 7. File:Before1hr45CExpt 123ce2f3a.tif 8. File:Before2hr4cCExpt.tif 9. File:Before+2hr42C 12.3.bp1f1.tif 10. File:Before1hr42CExpt.tif 11. File:Mock123am1f3.tif
Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis
For each image taken using the GFP filter set, we analyzed individual cells exhibiting fluorescence and analyzed their intensities using Image J Software. In order to quantitatively determine this, we adjusted for corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) using the following formula: CTCF = Integrated Density - (Area of Cell * Mean Background Fluorescence Reading). This was done for each heat shock experimental sample condition for our “Experimental” samples. These values were then averaged. We used a two-tailed, unpaired t test to determine significance.
File:SARF Microscopy Image J analysis
Plate Reader Data
On our second experimental transfection, cells were trypsinized 24 hours after heat shock and transferred to a 96 well plate for fluorescence assays. Analysis of this data suggests that data is inconclusive- this is likely attributable to the low transfection efficiency, and the difficulty of identifying quantitative increases in fluorescence using somewhat noisy data.
File:Plate Reader Assay.xls
Stanford Location
Barcode #: 0128166602
Plasmid Name: HS-Rec
Antibiotic Resistance: Ampicillin
DNA 2.0 gene #:193566
Organism Expressed in: HeLa
Sensor/Actuator: Both
User Reviews
UNIQ38ad35dafd46b0e6-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ38ad35dafd46b0e6-partinfo-00000001-QINU