Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1465229"
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<h1>Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase</h1>
 
<h1>Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase</h1>
  
−
<p>The SBPase is one of enzymes needed for the Calvin cycle. It catalyzes the reaction from sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate to sedoheptulose 7-phosphate. The enzyme is characteristic for the part of sedoheptulose 7-phosphate regeneration in the Calvin-cycle. It was shown before that oveerexpression of the SBPase in tobacco results in enhanced carbon assimilation and crop yield (Rosenthal et al., 2011). SBPases are homodimers with two identical subunits of 35kD to 38kD. The <i>K<sub>M</sub></i>-value of the SBPase homologue GlpX of <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#B.methanolicus" target="_blank"><i>Bacillus methanolicus</i></a> is 14 &plusmn; 0.5 µM (Stolzenberger et al., 2013).<br>
+
The SBPase is one of enzymes needed for the Calvin cycle. It catalyzes the reaction from sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate to sedoheptulose 7-phosphate. The enzyme is characteristic for the part of sedoheptulose 7-phosphate regeneration in the Calvin-cycle. It was shown before that oveerexpression of the SBPase in tobacco results in enhanced carbon assimilation and crop yield (Rosenthal et al., 2011). SBPases are homodimers with two identical subunits of 35kD to 38kD. The <i>K<sub>M</sub></i>-value of the SBPase homologue GlpX of <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#B.methanolicus" target="_blank"><i>Bacillus methanolicus</i></a> is 14 &plusmn; 0.5 µM (Stolzenberger et al., 2013).<br>
−
<i>E. coli</i> does not have a SBPase homologue which is needed <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#E.coli" target="_blank"><i>E. coli</i></a> for enabling the whole cycle.</p>
+
<i>E. coli</i> does not have a SBPase homologue which is needed <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#E.coli" target="_blank"><i>E. coli</i></a> for enabling the whole cycle.
  
 
<center>
 
<center>
Line 16: Line 16:
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_2014-10-11_sbpase.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_2014-10-11_sbpase.png" width="450px"></a><br>
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_2014-10-11_sbpase.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_2014-10-11_sbpase.png" width="450px"></a><br>
 
<font size="1" style="text-align:center;"> <b>Figure 2:</b> Reaction of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase</font>
 
<font size="1" style="text-align:center;"> <b>Figure 2:</b> Reaction of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase</font>
−
</div>
 
 
</center>
 
</center>
−
 
−
</div>
 
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
Line 25: Line 22:
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
We decided to use glpX as a target for amplification and transformation because of the shown acitivity (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465228>BBa_K1465228</a>). The finished construct of ptac_glpX in pSB1C3 was cultivated in M9 glucose in comparison to the wild type. We performed two biological replicates and two technical replicates.
 
We decided to use glpX as a target for amplification and transformation because of the shown acitivity (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465228>BBa_K1465228</a>). The finished construct of ptac_glpX in pSB1C3 was cultivated in M9 glucose in comparison to the wild type. We performed two biological replicates and two technical replicates.
−
<center>
+
<center>  
−
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:650px">  
+
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8a/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_glucose.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8a/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_glucose.png" width="650px"></a><br>
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8a/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_glucose.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8a/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_glucose.png" width="650px"></a><br>
 
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 13</b>: Cultivation experiment in M9 glucose (two technical and two biological replicates)</font>
 
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 13</b>: Cultivation experiment in M9 glucose (two technical and two biological replicates)</font>
−
</div>
 
 
</center>
 
</center>
  
Line 36: Line 31:
  
 
<center>
 
<center>
−
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:650px">
 
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_xylose.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_xylose.png" width="650px"></a><br>
 
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_xylose.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_cultivation_glpX_xylose.png" width="650px"></a><br>
 
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 14</b>: Cultivation experiment in M9 xylose</font>
 
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 14</b>: Cultivation experiment in M9 xylose</font>
−
</div>
 
 
</center>
 
</center>
  
 
The cultivation was repeated with xylose. Xylose could be suitable additional carbon source if the Calvin cycle has a lower efficiency. This second cultivation shows the impact of the induction more clearly. The induced mutant strain shows a lower growth rate in comparison to the uninduced mutant and the wild type. This indicates that the lack of glucose in the medium has a large impact because necessary intermediates for the glycolysis were used by the SBPase.
 
The cultivation was repeated with xylose. Xylose could be suitable additional carbon source if the Calvin cycle has a lower efficiency. This second cultivation shows the impact of the induction more clearly. The induced mutant strain shows a lower growth rate in comparison to the uninduced mutant and the wild type. This indicates that the lack of glucose in the medium has a large impact because necessary intermediates for the glycolysis were used by the SBPase.
  
−
              </p>
 
−
          </div>
 
−
      </div>
 
−
 
−
<div class="element" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px; padding:10px 10px 10px 10px">
 
−
  <div id="text">
 
 
<h1>References</h1>
 
<h1>References</h1>
−
  <p>
 
 
     <ul>
 
     <ul>
  
 
<li id="rosenthal2011">
 
<li id="rosenthal2011">
−
<div class="element" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px; padding:10px 10px 10px 10px">
 
−
  <div id="text">
 
 
       Rosenthal et al., 2011. Overexpressing the C(3) photosynthesis cycle enzyme sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase improves photosynthetic carbon gain and yield under fully open air CO(2) fumigation (FACE). <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/11/123" target="_blank">BMC Plant Biol.</a>, vol. 11, pp. 123
 
       Rosenthal et al., 2011. Overexpressing the C(3) photosynthesis cycle enzyme sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase improves photosynthetic carbon gain and yield under fully open air CO(2) fumigation (FACE). <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/11/123" target="_blank">BMC Plant Biol.</a>, vol. 11, pp. 123
−
  </div>
 
−
</div>
 
 
</li>
 
</li>
  
 
<li id="stolzenberger2013">
 
<li id="stolzenberger2013">
−
<div class="element" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px; padding:10px 10px 10px 10px">
 
−
  <div id="text">
 
 
       Stolzenberger et al., 2013. Characterization of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase and Sedoheptulose 1,7-Bisphosphate from the Facultative Ribulose Monophosphate Cycle Methylotroph <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#B.methanolicus" target="_blank"><i>Bacillus methanolicus</i></a>. <a href="http://jb.asm.org/content/195/22/5112.long" target="_blank">Journal of Bacteriology</a>, Vol. 195, pp. 5112-5122
 
       Stolzenberger et al., 2013. Characterization of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase and Sedoheptulose 1,7-Bisphosphate from the Facultative Ribulose Monophosphate Cycle Methylotroph <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/Organisms#B.methanolicus" target="_blank"><i>Bacillus methanolicus</i></a>. <a href="http://jb.asm.org/content/195/22/5112.long" target="_blank">Journal of Bacteriology</a>, Vol. 195, pp. 5112-5122
−
  </div>
 
−
</div>
 
 
</li>
 
</li>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
 +
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>

Revision as of 03:53, 18 October 2014

Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (glpX) from Bacillus methanolicus under the control of ptac



Usage and Biology

Sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase

The SBPase is one of enzymes needed for the Calvin cycle. It catalyzes the reaction from sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate to sedoheptulose 7-phosphate. The enzyme is characteristic for the part of sedoheptulose 7-phosphate regeneration in the Calvin-cycle. It was shown before that oveerexpression of the SBPase in tobacco results in enhanced carbon assimilation and crop yield (Rosenthal et al., 2011). SBPases are homodimers with two identical subunits of 35kD to 38kD. The KM-value of the SBPase homologue GlpX of Bacillus methanolicus is 14 ± 0.5 µM (Stolzenberger et al., 2013).
E. coli does not have a SBPase homologue which is needed E. coli for enabling the whole cycle.

Figure 2: Reaction of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase

Characterization

We decided to use glpX as a target for amplification and transformation because of the shown acitivity (
Figure 13: Cultivation experiment in M9 glucose (two technical and two biological replicates) The cultivation shows that the modified strain has an extended lag phase. Two hours after IPTG induction of the gene expression, a decrease of growth was observed in comparison to the uninduced strain. There are two possible explanations for this behavior. On the one side IPTG acts as a toxic substance for bacteria which may result in growth decrease and on the other side the production of the protein can result in decreased growth. We exclude IPTG as a reason because earlier cultivations showed that 1 mM IPTG has no effects on the wild type growth. Furthermore the wild type strain shows an one hour reduced lag-phase in comparison to the induced strain. The induced strain also shows a higher OD. By inducing the SBPase in E. coli the substances for glycolysis are deflected towards other pathways. These reactions are reversible which means that the glucose of the M9 medium is not metabolized in another pathway. This time shifted use of glucose results in a higher OD in two biological replicates.
This result shows that the SBPase does not limit the growth maximum of E. coli. The glucose concentration confirms these results. The wild type consumes the glucose faster than the mutant strains.


Figure 14: Cultivation experiment in M9 xylose
The cultivation was repeated with xylose. Xylose could be suitable additional carbon source if the Calvin cycle has a lower efficiency. This second cultivation shows the impact of the induction more clearly. The induced mutant strain shows a lower growth rate in comparison to the uninduced mutant and the wild type. This indicates that the lack of glucose in the medium has a large impact because necessary intermediates for the glycolysis were used by the SBPase.

References

  • Rosenthal et al., 2011. Overexpressing the C(3) photosynthesis cycle enzyme sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase improves photosynthetic carbon gain and yield under fully open air CO(2) fumigation (FACE). BMC Plant Biol., vol. 11, pp. 123
  • Stolzenberger et al., 2013. Characterization of Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase and Sedoheptulose 1,7-Bisphosphate from the Facultative Ribulose Monophosphate Cycle Methylotroph Bacillus methanolicus. Journal of Bacteriology, Vol. 195, pp. 5112-5122


    • Sequence and Features


    Assembly Compatibility:
    • 10
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    • 12
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    • 21
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    • 23
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    • 25
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    • 1000
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]