Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1471002:Design"
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
===Design Notes===
 
===Design Notes===
−
The RBS came from an Eukaryotic cell and MerE came from bacterial operon mer for mercury resistance.
 
−
 
  
 +
We have to optimized its codons in Arabidopsis Thaliana and removed the restriction sites for EcoR1, Xba1, Spe1 and Pst1.
  
 
===Source===
 
===Source===
  
−
We have to optimized its codons in Arabidopsis Thaliana and removed the restriction sites for EcoR1, Xba1, Spe1 and Pst1.
+
The RBS came from an Eukaryotic cell and MerE came from bacterial operon mer for mercury resistance.
  
 
===References===
 
===References===

Revision as of 04:23, 16 October 2014

RBS with MerE.


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

We have to optimized its codons in Arabidopsis Thaliana and removed the restriction sites for EcoR1, Xba1, Spe1 and Pst1.

Source

The RBS came from an Eukaryotic cell and MerE came from bacterial operon mer for mercury resistance.

References

Das S., Dash H. R., (2012). Bioremediation of mercury and the importance of bacterial mer genes. National Institute of Technology.India: International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. Volume 75. Pages 207-213

Kiyono M. , et al (2013) Increase methylmercury accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana expressing bacterial broad-spectrum mercury transporter MerE. Springer. Issue 3; Pages 1-13

Kiyono M., Sone Y., Nakamura R., et al (2013) Role of MerC, MerE, MerF, MerT, and/or MerP in Resistance to Mercurials and the Transport of Mercurials in Escherichia coli. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. Volume 36; Issue 11; pages 1835-1841