Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1189021"
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<h1>Results</h1> | <h1>Results</h1> | ||
+ | <a name="Reporter data"></a> | ||
<h3>Performance of BBa_K1189021 as a reporter</h3> | <h3>Performance of BBa_K1189021 as a reporter</h3> | ||
− | <p>BBa_K1189021 was expressed in <i>E. coil BL21</i> and purified using metal affinity chromatography on an FPLC. The purified protein was chemically modified into <a href | + | <p>BBa_K1189021 was expressed in <i>E. coil BL21</i> and purified using metal affinity chromatography on an FPLC. The purified protein was chemically modified into <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter/PrussianBlueFerritin">Prussian blue ferritin</a>. Output from this TALE-ferritin fusion (BBa_K1189021) was compared to output from ferritin/TALEs bound with a coiled-coil linker <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">(BBa_K1189037)</a>.</p> |
+ | |||
+ | <p>Purified K_1189021 was successfully converted into Prussian blue ferritin. However, Figure 5 shows that the TALE ferritin fusion is a less effective reporter than ferritin and TALEs connected with coiled-coils linkers (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a>). It seems that large protein fusions reduce effectiveness of ferritin as a reporter. Figure 6 shows that ferritin with coiled-coils (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a>) maintains reporter functionality when TALEs are scaffolded using coiled-coil linkers. Therefore, the 2013 iGEM Calgary team has elected to use <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> as their FerriTALE DNA detector.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/89/UCalgary2013TRRecombinantPrussianBlueFerritin.png" alt="Creating Prussian Blue Ferritin out of our Own Ferritin" width="800" height="511"> | ||
+ | <figcaption> | ||
+ | <p><b>Figure 5.</b> Measurements of the coloured substrate TMB (10 mg/mL) at 650 nm over a 600 second time period for our own Prussian blue ferritin and unmodified ferritin. Sample volume was 242 µL. Controls for this experiment include bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL)and the substrate solution by itself. Due to limitations on the protein available only one replicate was performed. Zero time points do not have low absorbance as colour change was rapid and began before measurements started.</p> | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/0d/UCalgary2013TRPBFAssayNoColour.png" alt="Recombinant Prussian Blue FerritinMole Balanced" width="465" height="480"> | ||
+ | <figcaption> | ||
+ | <p><b>Figure 6.</b> Samples of our parts that were converted to Prussian Blue ferritin were mole balanced in order to ensure that the same number of effective ferritin cores are present in every sample. Additionally the ferritin-coil fusion was incubated with the TALE-coil fusion part in order to allow their binding for a separate trial. Negative controls include unconverted recombinant ferritin, bovine serum albumin and a substrate only control. Samples were incubated with a TMB substrate solution for 10 minutes at a pH of 5.6. Absorbance readings were taken at the 10 minute time-point at a wavelength of 650 nm. An ANOVA (analysis of variants) was performed upon the values to determine that there was statistical difference in the data gathered (based off of three replicates). A t-test was then performed which determined that the * columns are significantly different from the ** column (p=0.0012). Neither * column is significantly different from each other (p=0.67).</p> | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Please see the <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter/PrussianBlueFerritin">Prussian blue ferritin Wiki</a> page for a detailed analysis of how Prussian blue ferritin, synthesized from commercially available ferritin, performs as a reporter. This data informs how <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> is useful as a reporter.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br></br> | ||
<h1>References</h1> | <h1>References</h1> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>Chasteen, N. D., & Harrison, P. M. (1999). Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. Journal of structural biology, 126(3), 182-194.</li> |
+ | |||
+ | <li>Dehal, P. K., Livingston, C. F., Dunn, C. G., Buick, R., Luxton, R., & Pritchard, D. J. (2010). Magnetizable antibody‐like proteins. Biotechnology journal, 5(6), 596-604.</li> | ||
<br></br> | <br></br> |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 1 November 2013
Fusion of ferrtin subunits linked to a DNA detector
Ferritin is a protein shelled nanoparticle and is composed of a mixture of 24 light (BBa_K1189024) and heavy (BBa_K1189025) subunits (see Figure 1). It is ubiquitous across eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems and is used to sequester intracellular iron (Chasteen et al., 1991). The 2013 iGEM Calgary used ferritin’s iron core as a reporter and its protein shell to scaffold a DNA sensing TALE (BBa_K1189022) as part of their project, the FerriTALE. The TALE sequence was based off of BBa_K782004 from the 2012 Slovenia iGEM team. The Calgary team used this TALE as a proof of concept for their DNA detector.
Design features
BBa_K1189021 is a fusion of heavy and light ferritin subunits, such that ferritin nanoparticles are formed from 12 di-subunits. The rationale for this design is that it reduces the number of N-termini on ferritin to which proteins can be fused by half, which is important for lessening potential steric hindrances among the fused TALE in the 3D sphere surrounding ferritin. Additionally, di-subunits mandate a 1:1 ratio of heavy and light subunits, ensuring consistency in ferritin’s iron uptake dynamics. Moreover, these di-subunit fusions have been shown stable in engineered applications with other proteins scaffolded to ferritin (Dehal et al., 2010).
TALE A (BBa_K1189022) is attached to the N-terminus of the ferritin di-subunit. Given that the C-terminus of ferritin is oriented toward the core of ferritin, and that we wanted proteins to be displayed on the outside of the ferritin sphere, we selected the N-terminus (CITE ME). TALE A is connected to ferritin by a flexible GS linker (BBa_1189022). The iGEM Calgary team made this decision because spatial modelling suggested that TALEs require freedom of movement to allow for DNA binding. See Figure two for a diagram of BBa_K1189021.
Results
Performance of BBa_K1189021 as a reporter
BBa_K1189021 was expressed in E. coil BL21 and purified using metal affinity chromatography on an FPLC. The purified protein was chemically modified into Prussian blue ferritin. Output from this TALE-ferritin fusion (BBa_K1189021) was compared to output from ferritin/TALEs bound with a coiled-coil linker (BBa_K1189037).
Purified K_1189021 was successfully converted into Prussian blue ferritin. However, Figure 5 shows that the TALE ferritin fusion is a less effective reporter than ferritin and TALEs connected with coiled-coils linkers (BBa_K1189037). It seems that large protein fusions reduce effectiveness of ferritin as a reporter. Figure 6 shows that ferritin with coiled-coils (BBa_K1189037) maintains reporter functionality when TALEs are scaffolded using coiled-coil linkers. Therefore, the 2013 iGEM Calgary team has elected to use BBa_K1189037 as their FerriTALE DNA detector.
Please see the Prussian blue ferritin Wiki page for a detailed analysis of how Prussian blue ferritin, synthesized from commercially available ferritin, performs as a reporter. This data informs how BBa_K1189037 is useful as a reporter.
References
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 2654
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 3656