Difference between revisions of "PBAD SPL"
Pdworzynski (Talk | contribs) |
Pdworzynski (Talk | contribs) (→DTU pBAD SPL) |
||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
|align="center"|20.7 | |align="center"|20.7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 156: | Line 153: | ||
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
− | + | more_color(); | |
</script> | </script> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 12:55, 4 October 2013
Here the DTU iGEM team will present their work on characterizing a SPL of pBAD promoters.
List of sequences:
DTU pBAD SPL
Identifier | Sequence | Induced Strength | Leakyness | Inducibilitya | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Col. 2 | CTGACGACGCCCCTCTCCGCCCCTTAAAATGTCCA | 14.2 | 0.203 | 69.9 | ||
Col. 3 | CTGACGTAATCATACCGCCGAAAGTATTATCATTA | 16.6 | 0.426 | 39 | ||
Col. 4 | CTGACGCGACAACATTGCGTCCTATAAAATGCCGA | 14.2 | 0.345 | 41 | ||
Col. 5 | CTGACGGCCCGCCCCCGATGCGCATAAAATACCAA | 17.7 | 0.424 | 41.6 | ||
Col. 12 | CTGACGCGTATCGCGAGCGGGCGTTATTATACGCA | 13.6 | 0.414 | 32.9 | ||
Col. 10 | CTGACGCCCCGAATCAGTAGTATTTATTATCTAGA | 18 | 0.462 | 38.8 | ||
Col. 9 | CTGACGCCACCCCCCCCCCCGGCGTATAATTCCCA | 16.1 | 0.530 | 30.4 | ||
Col. 8 | CTGACGCCCTACCGCTCGCCCCCCTATTATACCCA | 13.4 | 0.211 | 63.4 | ||
Col. 13 | CTGACGCCCCCCCCGTCCACCCCCTAATATCCCGA | 10.9 | 0.096 | 113.6 | ||
Col. 15 | CTGACGTGCGCCTGCCGTCCAAAGTAATATCCTTA | 15.5 | 0.235 | 65.8 | ||
Col. 18 | CTGACGCCCCGAATCAGTAGTATTTATTATCTAGA | 19.8 | 0.524 | 37.8 | ||
Col. 19 | CTGACGCTCGCACCGGCGACCCGATAATATCCATA | 18.0 | 0.315 | 57 | ||
Col. 31 | CTGACGCCCCCCCTCCCCCGACCTAAAATATCCAG | 3.8 | 0.161 | 23.6 | ||
Col. 29 | CTGACGCCGCTGCACCCGTCCCCCTATTATAGCAA | 14.8 | 0.301 | 49.2 | ||
Col. 26 | CTGACGCCGATCCTATCTCCCTATTAAAATTTTTA | 13.8 | 0.292 | 47.2 | ||
Col. 22 | CTGACGCCCCGAATCAGTAGTATTTATTATCTAGA | 16.8 | 0.466 | 36.1 | ||
Col. 33 | CTGACGCCAGCTTCCTACTTCAAATATAATCCGTA | 14.4 | 1.01 | 14.3 | ||
Col. 34 | CTGACGTCCCTCTTCCGCGCCCCCTAAAATACCCA | 12.4 | 0.187 | 65.9 | ||
Col. 35 | CTGACGCCCAACCCGACACAGCGATATAATAATGA | 18.4 | 0.89 | 20.7 |