Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K733018:Experience"

(→‎User Reviews)
(→‎User Reviews)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K733018 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K733018 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>BBa_K733018 AddReview number</partinfo>
 +
 +
<I>Username</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
  Enter the review information here.
 +
|};
 +
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
|-
 
|-
Line 16: Line 26:
 
<I>2013SUSTC-Shenzhen-A</I>
 
<I>2013SUSTC-Shenzhen-A</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
−
<p>Compared with the results of the efficiency of the xylose inducible promoter detected by the HKT, our consequence differed from them in some aspects, or better. We had used the FCM to detect it. There was an obvious tendency that the efficiency of the promoter increased as the xylose concentration gathered up. What was amazing was that the fluorescence we got was 10 times brighter than the result the HKT got, which appeared to be great.</p>
+
  <p>Compared with the results of the efficiency of the xylose inducible promoter detected by the HKT, our consequence differed from them in some aspects, or better. We had used the FCM to detect it. There was an obvious tendency that the efficiency of the promoter increased as the xylose concentration gathered up. What was amazing was that the fluorescence we got was 10 times brighter than the result the HKT got, which appeared to be great.</p>
 
<p>But when the concentration of the xylose was 0.03% and 0.3%, we got an unexpected result that the expression of the GFP fell after rise. What’s more. While the concentration of the xylose was 10%, the expression of the GFP decreased, which corresponded with the result of the HKT.</p>
 
<p>But when the concentration of the xylose was 0.03% and 0.3%, we got an unexpected result that the expression of the GFP fell after rise. What’s more. While the concentration of the xylose was 10%, the expression of the GFP decreased, which corresponded with the result of the HKT.</p>
−
[[File:Glucosesustc.jpg]]
+
 
−
<html>
+
 
|};
 
|};
−
<!-- End of the user review template -->
+
 
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K733018 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K733018 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 02:08, 27 September 2013


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K733018

User Reviews

UNIQ193bed25b3c1ef0c-partinfo-00000000-QINU

No review score entered.

2013SUSTC-Shenzhen-A

Compared with the results of the efficiency of the xylose inducible promoter detected by the HKT, our consequence differed from them in some aspects, or better. We had used the FCM to detect it. There was an obvious tendency that the efficiency of the promoter increased as the xylose concentration gathered up. What was amazing was that the fluorescence we got was 10 times brighter than the result the HKT got, which appeared to be great.

But when the concentration of the xylose was 0.03% and 0.3%, we got an unexpected result that the expression of the GFP fell after rise. What’s more. While the concentration of the xylose was 10%, the expression of the GFP decreased, which corresponded with the result of the HKT.

;

UNIQ193bed25b3c1ef0c-partinfo-00000002-QINU