Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1139150:Experinece"

(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''1. Materials and Methods'''<br>
 
*1-1. Construction<br>
 
-pSB6A1-Ptet-GFP (N99)…positive control<br>
 
-pSB6A1-promoterless-GFP (N99)…negative control<br>
 
-pSB6A1-Prm/lac-GFP (N99)…sample with CI*<br>
 
-pSB6A1--Prm/lac-GFP (JM2.300)…sample without CI<br>
 
This N99 expresses CI from its genome constitutively.<br>
 
  
[[Image:Titech2013_parts_K1139150_Fig1D.jpg|thumb|center|500px|]]
 
 
*1-2. Assay protocol<br>
 
1. Prepare overnight culture of each cell at 37°C for 12 hours.<br>
 
2. Take 30 microL of the overnight cultures into LB (3 mL) containing antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL) and 1 mM of IPTG* (→fresh culture)<br>
 
We added IPTG in order to make sure to repress the expression of LacI derived from E. coli genome.<br>
 
3. After 4 hours of induction, flow cytometer measurements for GFP expression.<br>
 
 
'''2. Results'''<br>
 
Fig. 2-1 shows the fluorescence intensity detected by flow cytometer.<br>
 
Fig. 2-2 is the extracted data which shows the comparison of N99 (IPTG+, with constitutive CI) and JM2.300 (IPTG+, without CI).<br>
 
 
[[Image:Titech2013_parts_K1139150_Fig1B.jpg|thumb|center|500px|'''Fig. 2-1.''' Fluorescence intensity detected by flow cytometer]]
 
[[Image:Titech2013_parts_K1139150_Fig1C.jpg|thumb|center|500px|'''Fig. 2-2.''' Comparison of N99 and JM2.300]]
 
 
'''3. Discussion'''<br>
 
N99 cells (CI+) showed higher fluorescence intensity than JM2.300 cells (CI-). From this experiment, we assume that our ''rm/lac'' hybrid promoter is actually activated by CI.<br>
 
We are now confirming that our ''rm/lac'' hybrid promoter is not only activated by CI but also repressed by LacI.
 

Revision as of 02:39, 26 September 2013