Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041001"

(→‎Restriction Digests)
(→‎Restriction Digests)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
===Restriction Digests===
 
===Restriction Digests===
 
Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. ''Fig 1''
 
Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. ''Fig 1''
−
[[image:BIORAD 2013-09-18 16hr 02min.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 1:Lane 1-3 contains uncut Bba_K1041001 and Bba_K1041001 cut with XbaI and NdeI then EcoRI and SpeI respectively.]]
+
[[image:BIORAD 2013-09-18 16hr 02min.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 1:Lane 1 contains uncut Bba_K1041001 and Lane 2 Bba_K1041001 cut with XbaI and NdeI.]]
  
 
<br>
 
<br>

Revision as of 11:32, 20 September 2013

Neomycin Resistance Coding Device + AntG promoter

Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 designed this part to contain the promoter sequence AntG, where the unique sigma factor AntA binds to activate transcription of the neomycin resistance gene. There is a Nde1 resticition site between the promoter and gene to allow either to be removed and exchanged for a different promoter or gene. This facilitated cloning of the biobrick Bba_K1041002

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 757
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 606
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 816


Characterisation

Characterisation of this biobrick involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.

Restriction Digests

Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. Fig 1

Fig 1:Lane 1 contains uncut Bba_K1041001 and Lane 2 Bba_K1041001 cut with XbaI and NdeI.


















Sequencing

The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we recieved back Fig 2,3,4 showed the DNA is good quality.


Fig 2:K1041001 sequencing data part 1
Fig 3:K1041001 sequencing data part 2
Fig 4:K1041001 sequencing data part 3










BLAST Analysis

The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence Fig 5,6. The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 98% matches with the expected DNA sequence.

Fig 5: Forward primer K1041001 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence
Fig 6: Reverse primer K1041001 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence