Difference between revisions of "BBa K731700 and BBa K731710 measurements"

Revision as of 14:27, 22 September 2012

Hello world

In this page we are really proud to introduce you the protocol we (Giacomo and Anna) developed for the characterization transcriptional terminators effects on gene expression. (Tested on BBa_J64997)

The develop of this protocolcost us not only sleepless night but also sunny and beautiful weekend of trekking so take a hot cup of tea and read it all.

IN VIVO ANALYSIS

BEFORE STARTING:

In order to analyse terminators through this method is necessary to follow the entire procedure with both the platform without intervening terminator (control) and the platform with terminator (sample).

CELLS GROWTH AND SAMPLES PREPARATION (starting from a glycerol stock):

100ul of cells (i.e. BL21(DE3) pLysS) tranformed with the platform (control or sample) in 10 ml fresh Luria Bertani medium (LB)

NOTE1:Antibiotic are at concentration of 0.1mg/ml ampicillin and 0.035mg/ml cloranphenicol

NOTE2:Four glycerol stocks for both control and sample will give you a good level of significance

Grow the cultures at 37°C in the termoshaker until optical density at 600nm (O.D.) ~ 0.4 (the O.D. at which you stop the sample is not important until it is major than 0.2.)

(chill on ice for the whole duration of this point) Dilute samples to OD 0.2 in order to have the same O.D. at the moment of induction.
- x = 10ml*0.2 O.D./0.4 O.D. (where x are the ml of culture you need to take from the culture in the termoshaker)
- LB = 10ml-x (where LB are the ml of LB you need to add to x to obtain OD 0.2)
Grow 37°C in the termoshaker until O.D. ~ 0.6.
Induce with 0.5mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).
3 hours induction at 37°C in the termoshaker.
Chill falcon on ice
Move 1ml of induced culture to an eppendorf.
Sonication (3 repetition of 10 s 50% amplitude sonication and 30 s of pause).
1.5 min centrifuge (4000rpm).
Move supernatant from eppendorf to cuvette.
Add 1 mL buffer (i.e.: PBS)
Leave the cuvettes over night (O.N.) it the 4°C fridge
Fluorimetric measurements

PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT:

Emission and Excitation parameter choise:

The emission and excitation parameters must be aimed at achievement of the maximum distance between the two points at which you take emission measurements and the maximum comparability in terms of fluorescence intensity according to the limits imposed by the two fluorescent proteins in use.

Example: The two proteins in use in BBa_K731700 and BBa_K731710 are mCherry and A206K Venus (mVenus). After excitation of the two proteins with standard parameters we note a huge difference in fluorescence intensity between the two proteins; moreover the proximity between the excitation wavelenght and the emission peak can easily influence the measurements. In this case a shift of the brighter protein (mVenus) excitation wavelenght toward smaller wavelenght can bring several benefits:

A decrease in fluorescene intensity
A larger distance between the excitation wavelenght and the emission peak

The same approach for the less bright protein (mCherry) is not exploitable since would have the effect of further reducing the emission peak intensity; the better way to have a lower influence on the emission peak due to the proximity to the excitation wavelenght is to use a wavelenght different from the emission peak for measurements (point with a bigger wasvelenght).

	Standard Excitation (nm)	Standard Emission (nm)	Modified Excitation (nm)	Modified Emission (nm)
mCherry	587	609	587	615
mVenus	515	528	485	528

TABLE 1: Standard and modified excitation and emission wavelengths

CHART 1A/B: Emission scan of BBa_K731700 (A) and BBa_K731710 (B) with standard and modified excitation wavelenght (instrument: Varian Cary Eclipse, voltage: 570 V (A) and 520 V (B))

Sonication of the samples:

In order to reduce the scattering (signal due to excitation light in proximity of the excitation wavelenght) and to have a clearer signal, we decided to sonicate our sample before measure them. Both the improvements are due to the lower O.D. of a sonicated sample compared to a cell suspension sample. A higher O.D. means a decrease in the amount of light emitted by the fluorescent proteins that reach the sensor (light that), a decrease in the light that actually reach the fluorescent proteins and an icrease of the excitation light that is reflected to the sensor (increase in scattering).

CHART 2: Sonicated sample vs Cell suspension sample

Test on different colonies:

The use of glycerol stock instead of O.N cultures makes the procedure easier and faster. Glycerol stocks come however from the same colony so it was necessary to test the platform with cultures of different origin in order to find eventual differences in the behavior. <p style="width:900px"; text-align

CHART 3: Behavaior of different colonies. TABLE 2: The table shows the statistic analysis performed on the data in CHART 3. Neither the proteins peaks of the two plates nor their ratio are significantly different (the result of ‘0 min after sonication (A206K Venus plate1 vs A206K Venus plate2)’ is considered a false positive since the other two times show no significant difference).

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 The use of glycerol stock instead of O.N cultures makes the procedure easier and faster. Glycerol stocks come however from the same colony so it was necessary to test the platform with cultures of different origin in order to find eventual differences in the behavior.
+<p style="width:900px"; text-align
 [[Image:Coloniesjpg.jpg]][[Image:Statcolony.jpg]]