Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J10050:Experience"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<I>Username</I> | <I>Username</I> | ||
|width='60%' valign='top'| | |width='60%' valign='top'| | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | Differences in promoter strength had more effect on enzymatic expression compared to differences in RBS strengths as evidenced in the graphs below. Lambert_GA 2019 had originally thought that BBa_J10050 would result in the least amount of expression out of the tested combinations, but this part, along with BBa_J10052 and BBa_J10053, all shared the lowest expression out of the combinations. This is due to the translation rate not being an important factor in the determination of expression of ONP; however, the promoter strength is a significant factor. In other words, expression values are significantly different with different promoters but not with different RBS strengths. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
|}; | |}; | ||
<!-- End of the user review template --> | <!-- End of the user review template --> | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_J10050 EndReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_J10050 EndReviews</partinfo> | ||
Revision as of 10:42, 21 October 2019
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_J10050
User Reviews
UNIQ5851ed0ec5069cf7-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ5851ed0ec5069cf7-partinfo-00000001-QINU