Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K592032:Experience"

(User Reviews)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='10%'|
 
|width='10%'|
<partinfo>BBa_K592101 AddReview 1</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K592032 AddReview 1</partinfo>
 
<I>iGEM2011_Uppsala-Sweden</I>
 
<I>iGEM2011_Uppsala-Sweden</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
This part used <partinfo>BBa_E0034</partinfo> EYFP which showed much weaker fluorescent activity than e.g. the newer <partinfo>BBa_K592101</partinfo> YFP. As a result, this part and its design is not very good for testing promoter strength.
+
This part used <partinfo>BBa_E0034</partinfo> EYFP which showed much weaker fluorescent activity than e.g. the newer <partinfo>BBa_K592101</partinfo> YFP. As a result, this part and its design is not very good for testing promoter strength. Recommend using stronger fluorescent proteins as reporters.  
 
|}
 
|}
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_I15010 EndReviews</partinfo>
+
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592032 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 18:31, 4 November 2011

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K592032

User Reviews

iGEM2011_Uppsala-Sweden

This part used BBa_E0034 EYFP which showed much weaker fluorescent activity than e.g. the newer BBa_K592101 YFP. As a result, this part and its design is not very good for testing promoter strength. Recommend using stronger fluorescent proteins as reporters.

UNIQc69a78458f4211a1-partinfo-00000003-QINU