Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K649104"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K649104 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K649104 short</partinfo> | ||
− | We characterized BBa_K649104 and BBa_K117002 in E.coli lsrR(-). | + | We characterized BBa_K649104 and BBa_K117002 in E.coli <i>lsrR</i>(-). |
[[Image:PlsrA2.png|thumb|center|600px|Fluorescence intensity of BBa_K649104 was much higher than that of promoterless-<i>gfp</i>(negative control).<br>Strain used in this assay lacks lsrR.<br>This work is done by Takuya Tsubaki.]] | [[Image:PlsrA2.png|thumb|center|600px|Fluorescence intensity of BBa_K649104 was much higher than that of promoterless-<i>gfp</i>(negative control).<br>Strain used in this assay lacks lsrR.<br>This work is done by Takuya Tsubaki.]] |
Revision as of 14:30, 28 October 2011
PlsrA-RBS-gfp
We characterized BBa_K649104 and BBa_K117002 in E.coli lsrR(-).
We measured the transcriptional activity of our lsrA promoter(BBa_K649100) by introducing a gfp gene downstream of the promoter. Its fluorescence intensity was much higher than that of promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that our new lsrA promoter works. Moreover,fluorescence intensity of lsrA promoter-gfp((BBa_K117002)-gfp) was almost the same as a promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that lsrA promoter(BBa_K117002) does not work properly.
We improved previous lsrA promoter(BBa_K117002).our assay of BBa_K117002
For more information, see [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Projects/RPS-game/assay#5. our work in Tokyo_Tech 2011 wiki].
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 770