Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K649104"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K649104 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K649104 short</partinfo> | ||
+ | [[Image:PlsrA_activity1.png|thumb|center|500px|Median fluorescence intensity(MFI) of BBa_K649104 was much higher than that of promoterless-gfp(negative control).<br>This work is done by Takuya Tsubaki.]] | ||
− | We measured the transcriptional activity of our lsrA promoter by introducing a gfp gene downstream of the promoter. Its fluorescence intensity was much higher than that | + | We measured the transcriptional activity of our lsrA promoter(BBa_K649100) by introducing a gfp gene downstream of the promoter. Its fluorescence intensity was much higher than that of promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that our new lsrA promoter works. Moreover,fluorescence intensity of PlsrA(BBa_117002)-gfp was almost the same as a promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that BBa_K117002 does not work properly. |
Revision as of 09:11, 3 October 2011
PlsrA-RBS-gfp
We measured the transcriptional activity of our lsrA promoter(BBa_K649100) by introducing a gfp gene downstream of the promoter. Its fluorescence intensity was much higher than that of promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that our new lsrA promoter works. Moreover,fluorescence intensity of PlsrA(BBa_117002)-gfp was almost the same as a promoterless-gfp(negative control), showing that BBa_K117002 does not work properly.
We improved previous lsrA promoter(BBa_K117002).our assay of BBa_K117002
For more information, see our work in Tokyo_Tech 2011 wiki
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 770