Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa I13521:Experience"
Line 55: Line 55:
 
Very visible to the naked eye (vs. CFP, YFP were not very visible without UV excitation).
 
Very visible to the naked eye (vs. CFP, YFP were not very visible without UV excitation).
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_I13521 EndReviews</partinfo>
 +
 +
 +
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_I13521 StartReviews</partinfo>
 +
<!-- Template for a user review
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>BBa_I13521 AddReview 2</partinfo>
 +
<I>Username</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
Enter the review inofrmation here.
 +
|};
 +
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>BBa_I13521 AddReview 5</partinfo>
 +
<I>UNIPV-Pavia iGEM 2011</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
Insert text here|}
  
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_I13521 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_I13521 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 19:38, 22 September 2011

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_I13521



For parts BBa_I13521 and BBa_I13522, their excitation and emission maxima were determined. BBa_B0034 was used as a negative control. These data were used later in following characterization experiments as set parameters. The host was E. coli Top Ten in all experiments.

w7


The graph above shows the emission scan for RFP in part BBa_I13521. Since it was the best option in terms of fluorescence yield, 570 nm was set as the excitation wavelength. As it can be seen from the graph, maximum emission wavelength is 605 nm.
Meanwhile, the graph below shows the emission scan for GFP in part BBa_I13522. Since it was the best option in terms of fluorescence yield, 395 nm was set as the excitation wavelength. As it can be seen from the graph, maximum emission wavelength is 515 nm.

For the parts BBa_I13521 and BBa_I13522 which are mentioned above, confocal laser scanning microscope images were taken in the host Top Ten.
w7

Characterization was performed by METU-TURKEY IGEM2010 Team

Thermostability Assay

For this BioBrick, the denaturation temperature was determined by heating the protein at a range of temperatures, and then measuring the fluorescence. This is a useful characterisation as it allows the selection of an appropriate reporter gene for the required temperature.

Stock solutions of mRFP were prepared by extracting the protein from cell lysate, and then 50μl aliquots of the solution were heated in a PCR thermocycler along a temperature gradient.

After two hours, 30μl was removed from each aliquot and diluted with 170μl of 20mM Tris buffer to give 200μl samples. The fluorescence of the samples was then measured on a 96-well plate. The corresponding curve was plotted on the graph below.

Results of the heat denaturation experiment. The temperature at which half of the protein is denatured is measured by looking at its fluorescence (PTm50) mRFP1: 82.2°C; GFPmut3b: 61.6°C; Dendra2: 89.1°C; sfGFP: 75.0°C.

The sigmoidal curves that were calculated gave us the following function which also created the coefficient K which happens to relate to PTm50 (temperature at which half of the protein is denatured measured by looking at its fluorescence):


This shows that the protein denatures at around 81°C

.

This characterisation was performed by the Imperial College London 2011 Team.

User Reviews

UNIQ234bf36e440df0d2-partinfo-00000003-QINU

•••••

melissali

Very visible to the naked eye (vs. CFP, YFP were not very visible without UV excitation).

UNIQ234bf36e440df0d2-partinfo-00000005-QINU


UNIQ234bf36e440df0d2-partinfo-00000006-QINU

•••••

UNIPV-Pavia iGEM 2011

Insert text here|}

UNIQ234bf36e440df0d2-partinfo-00000008-QINU