Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K592028:Experience"

 
(→‎User Reviews)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
Line 7: Line 6:
  
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
−
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592028 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
−
<!-- Template for a user review
 
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='10%'|
 
|width='10%'|
−
<partinfo>BBa_K592028 AddReview number</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K592028 AddReview 1</partinfo>
−
<I>Username</I>
+
<I>iGEM2011_Uppsala-Sweden</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
−
Enter the review inofrmation here.
+
This part used <partinfo>BBa_E0034</partinfo> EYFP which showed much weaker fluorescent activity than e.g. the newer <partinfo>BBa_K592101</partinfo> YFP. As a result, this part and its design is not very good for testing promoter strength. Recommend using stronger fluorescent proteins as reporters.  
−
|};
+
|}
−
<!-- End of the user review template -->
+
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592028 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592028 EndReviews</partinfo>

Revision as of 18:32, 4 November 2011

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K592028

User Reviews

•

iGEM2011_Uppsala-Sweden

This part used BBa_E0034 EYFP which showed much weaker fluorescent activity than e.g. the newer BBa_K592101 YFP. As a result, this part and its design is not very good for testing promoter strength. Recommend using stronger fluorescent proteins as reporters.

UNIQ0836a60bbb2c5f43-partinfo-00000003-QINU