Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K404002"
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Requirement''' | |'''Requirement''' | ||
− | | | + | |pSB1C3<br> |
|- | |- | ||
|'''Source''' | |'''Source''' | ||
Line 759: | Line 759: | ||
Both restriction sites interfering with ViralBrick insertions were | Both restriction sites interfering with ViralBrick insertions were | ||
mutated to | mutated to | ||
− | make SspI and PvuII single-cutters | + | make SspI and PvuII single-cutters.</span></p> |
<table class="MsoTableGrid" | <table class="MsoTableGrid" | ||
style="border: medium none ; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; text-align: left; margin-right: auto;" | style="border: medium none ; margin-left: auto; border-collapse: collapse; text-align: left; margin-right: auto;" | ||
Line 774: | Line 774: | ||
alt=""></p> | alt=""></p> | ||
<p class="MsoCaption"><span lang="EN-US">Figure | <p class="MsoCaption"><span lang="EN-US">Figure | ||
− | </span><span lang="EN-US"> | + | </span><span lang="EN-US">5</span> <span |
style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Comparison | style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Comparison | ||
of pSB1C3 (upper row) and pSB1C3_001 (lower row). Deletions of SspI and | of pSB1C3 (upper row) and pSB1C3_001 (lower row). Deletions of SspI and | ||
Line 786: | Line 786: | ||
containing both <i>rep</i> and <i>cap</i> | containing both <i>rep</i> and <i>cap</i> | ||
synthetic gene fragments including | synthetic gene fragments including | ||
− | the re-mutation of KpnI and the downstream p5TATA-less | + | the re-mutation of KpnI and the downstream p5TATA-less promoter was |
cloned into | cloned into | ||
the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid | the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid | ||
Line 792: | Line 792: | ||
culture revealed unexpected data. Not only did the newly assembled | culture revealed unexpected data. Not only did the newly assembled | ||
plasmid work | plasmid work | ||
− | (see Figure | + | (see Figure 6), but in comparison to pAAV containing the same <i>RepVP123</i> |
construct, pSB1C3_001 showed an about 3 times higher transduction | construct, pSB1C3_001 showed an about 3 times higher transduction | ||
efficiency. | efficiency. | ||
Line 818: | Line 818: | ||
src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/2b/Freiburg10_pAAV_pSB1C3_001.png"></span></p> | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/2b/Freiburg10_pAAV_pSB1C3_001.png"></span></p> | ||
<p class="MsoCaption"><span lang="EN-US">Figure | <p class="MsoCaption"><span lang="EN-US">Figure | ||
− | </span><span lang="EN-US"> | + | </span><span lang="EN-US">6</span> <span |
style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">AAV-293 | style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">AAV-293 | ||
cells were transfected with three plasmids pHelper, | cells were transfected with three plasmids pHelper, |
Latest revision as of 12:26, 31 October 2010
[AAV2]-Rep-VP123_p5-TATAless
[AAV2}-Rep-VP123_p5-TATAless | |
---|---|
BioBrick Nr. | BBa_K404002 |
RFC standard | RFC 25 |
Requirement | pSB1C3 |
Source | pAAV_RC from Stratagene |
Submitted by | [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Freiburg_Bioware FreiGEM 2010] |
Overview of RepVP123 plasmid
Modularization: Overview
In our terminology the term “RepVP123” encompasses the whole AAV2 genome excluding the ITRs. The rep locus comprises four proteins related to genome replication while the cap locus codes for the proteins VP1, VP2, VP3 and the assembly-associated protein (AAP), which are required for viral capsid assembly. Source of the RepVP123 BioBrick supplied within iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 Virus Construction Kit is the wild-type AAV2 RepVP123, as provided e. g. in the pAAV vector from Stratagene. In order to introduce iGEM standard and additionally enabling the possibility to modify the viral capsid via integration of certain motives within the viral loops 453 and 587 a total of twelve mutations within RepVP123 (see Figure 1) and additionally two mutations within the pSB1C3 backbone were performed either by Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) or by ordering and cloning of specifically designed gene sequences matching the required demands. Modifying the pSB1C3 led to iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware’s variant of this backbone, pSB1C3_001.
Figure 1 Mutations implemented into RepVP123 in order to establish both iGEM standard and loop insertion capability. Green arrows indicate integrated restriction sites, red red arrows indicate deleted restriction sites. KpnI was deleted first and reinstated afterwards. (see text). |
Plasmid name: |
Functionality (determinded in cell culture via transduction and flow cytometry ): |
4x mutations (PstI (310), BamHI (859), SalI (1239), PstI (4073)) |
inserted rep fragment |
inserted cap fragment |
reinstated KpnI |
pAAV |
pSB1C3_001 |
HSPG-ko |
pAAV_RC (wild-type) |
yes |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_4x mutant |
yes |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_inserts |
no |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_Cap |
yes |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_RepVP123 |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
pSB1C3_RepVP123_ p5TATAless |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
pSB1C3_RepVP123_ HSPG-ko_p5TATAless |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
Figure 2 Table contains complete overview about all plasmids containing RepVP123 which were used by iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010.
Modularization: Removing iGEM restriction sites and establishing loop insertion capability
Modifications in Rep
Figure 3 Restriction sites within the wild-type rep gene sequence, which were removed via cloning of synthetized rep gene fragment into the plasmid. The red box indicates the region spanned by the synthetic sequence. |
Making the RepVP123 wild-type compatible with the iGEM standards required the removal of five restriction sites (see Figure 1). This was achieved using site-directed mutagenesis for PstI (position 310) and PstI (4073). The remaining three iGEM restriction sites EcoRI (1578), PstI (1773) and EcoRI (1796) were replaced by a synthetic gene fragment, since the rep ORF contained these restriction sites in close proximity to each other plus an additional KpnI restriction site which was also not desired (see Figure 2). This gene fragment was cloned into the rep gene using HindIII and SwaI, which are single-cutting restriction enzymes adjacent to the target area. Additionally, BamHI (859) and SalI (1239) were removed, because these enzymes were required for genetically inserting the loop modifications in VP123.
Modifications in VP123
In order to implement the restriction sites necessary for targeting via loop insertions, the gene coding for the VP proteins was modified as well. The introduction of these restriction required up to four base mutations in a row, hence it was decided to synthesize this gene fragment and replace the wild-type sequence in RepVP123 as well.
Figure 4 Restriction sites within cap sequence showing introduced loop insertion restriction sites into cap to enable cloning of targeting or purification motifs into both 453 and 587 loops. Again, the red box indicates gene sequence which was synthetized. |
Modularization: Adapting pSB1C3 to loop insertions – pSB1C3_001
To fulfill iGEM requirements all plasmids need to be submitted in pSB1C3, therefore primers were ordered for amplifying RepVP123 containing all modifications done so far by PCR and cloning the into pSB1C3. Still, pSB1C3 contains two restriction sites for SspI and PvuII restriction enzymes in its CAT marker. Since these are necessary for cloning ViralBricks in this vector, the iGEM Team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 decided in agreement with iGEM Headquarters to implement a new standard for the pSB1C3 backbone which was named pSB1C3_001. Both restriction sites interfering with ViralBrick insertions were mutated to make SspI and PvuII single-cutters.
Figure 5 Comparison of pSB1C3 (upper row) and pSB1C3_001 (lower row). Deletions of SspI and PvuII are marked by red boxes. |
RepVP123 containing both rep and cap synthetic gene fragments including the re-mutation of KpnI and the downstream p5TATA-less promoter was cloned into the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid in cell culture revealed unexpected data. Not only did the newly assembled plasmid work (see Figure 6), but in comparison to pAAV containing the same RepVP123 construct, pSB1C3_001 showed an about 3 times higher transduction efficiency. Although exact reasons are still unknown, these results are probably related to the reduced length of pSB1C3_001 compared to the original pAAV plasmid of approximately 1000 base pairs.
Figure 6 AAV-293 cells were transfected with three plasmids pHelper, pSB1C3_001_[AAV2]-Rep-VP123_p5-TATAless or pAAV_RC_IRCK and pSB1C3_[AAV2]-left-ITR_pCMV_beta-globin_mVenus_hGH_[AAV2]-right-ITR providing essential genes and proteins for producing viral particles. After 48 hours post transfection, viral particles were harvested by freeze-thaw lysis and centrifugation followed by HT1080 transduction. mVenus expression of viral genomes was determined by flow cytomery after 24 hours post infection. Fluorescence is measured in surviving cells. Results showed functionality of RepVP123 within pSB1C3_001 vector and additionally increased transduction efficiency. |
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 3611
Illegal XhoI site found at 1913
Illegal XhoI site found at 2099 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 4137
Illegal BsaI site found at 4319
Illegal BsaI site found at 4356
Illegal SapI site found at 3048