Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K299815"
(Safety Committee red flag)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 +
{{Template:SafetyFlag|reason=[[Safety/Listeriolysin and Invasin | Listeriolysin and Invasin parts]]}}
 
{{BioCommons}}
 
{{BioCommons}}
−
<partinfo>BBa_K299815 short</partinfo>
+
<h2><partinfo>BBa_K299815 short</partinfo></h2>
−
 
+
<br>
 +
<h2>Bacteria transormed with this part are able to enter the cytosol of 38,96% of exposed mammalian cells.</h2>
  
  
 +
<p> <b>Invasin (INV)</b> plays a key role in the initiation of <i>Yersinia enterocolytica</i> and <i>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</i> infection. Through interaction with a beta1-integrin receptor present on the surface of eucaryotic cell membranes it triggers a signal-transduction pathway leading to internalisation of the whole bacterium in the endocytosis-dependent manner. The strong affinity of invasin to it’s receptor results in highly selective binding to the target molecule. Mammalian cells depleted of beta1-integrin cannot be infected.</p>
  
 +
<p><b>Listeriolysin O (LLO)</b> is a member of a widespread cholesterol-dependent pore-forming cytolysins family (CDCs). It's natural role in <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> is to provide endosomal escape. The first step of the process involves binding of monomeric listeriolysin molecules to lipid bilayer containing cholesterol. The binding induces conformational change that subsequently leads to the formation of a prepores' oligomeric structures (consisting of 33-50 monomers) converting into large (maximum 350A-diameter) pores. This severely disturbs the stability of endosomal membrane and causes it’s rupture.</p>
  
 +
<p>LLO is a phagosome-specyfic lysin. The acidic pH is necessary for it’s full hemolytic activity. Neutral pH of cytosol causes premature unfolding of TMH domains responsible for aqueous pore formation. This mechanism prevents <i>Listeria spp</i> from killing the host cell and losing the intracellular environment. In case of any tranformed strain it guarantees the lowest possible level of cytotoxicity, incomparable to this involved with the use of any other protein from CDCs family.</p>
  
 +
<p>
 +
<html>
 +
<div align="left">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/f7/Llo_structure.png" width="30%" align="left"/>
 +
<h4>Left: Structural model of the LLO monomer from: P. Schnupf , D.A. Portnoy Listeriolysin O: a phagosome-specific lysin, Microbes and infection (2007) 1176-1187</h4></div></html></p>
  
 +
<p><b>Green Fluorescent Protein</b> is a noninvasive fluorescent marker for gene expression, protein localisation and intracellulat protein targeting. Originally from <i>Aequorea victoria.</i></p>
  
 +
<p><h3>Authors:</h3>
 +
Cloned by Joanna Leszczyńska.<br>
 +
Created with the use of parts <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K299810">BBa K299810</a> and <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K299811">BBa K299811</a></html> cloned by Marta Błaszkiewicz.<br>
 +
Work supervised by Michał Lower at all levels.</p>
  
 +
<p><h3>Construct design.</h3>
 +
The part consists of J23102 promoter and B0032 RBS ligated to inv gene from <i>Yersinia pestis</i> (horizontal gene transfer form <i>Yersinia pseudotuberculosis</i>). Following elements are B0032 RBS ligated to synthetic gene encoding Listeriolysin, codon usage optimized for E. coli. Aminoacid sequence identical with mature form of LLO from Listeria monocytogenes. Original signal sequence (secretion signal) is omitted since it does not work in E. coli. GFP as marker. Double terminator (B0010+B0012) guarantees the stability of polycistronic RNA as a product of transcription. The construct is a full Invasiveness Operon. To find out more about it's background and design <html><a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/Stage3">click here</a></hrml>.</p>
  
 +
<p><h3>Safety.</h3>
 +
<b>Bacteria transformed with this part are invasive microorganisms</b>. All safety precautions must be taken when manipulating with transformed strain. It involves obligatory use of laboratory gloves. Work under laminar is strongly advised. All waste should be autoclaved to avoid accidental gene transfer to other bacteria and potential rise of pathogenic organism.</p>
  
 +
<p><h3>Performance</h3></p>
 +
<br>
  
 +
<p>
 +
<html>
 +
<div align="left">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/8/8c/Inv_%2B_lys_259.jpg"  width="35%" align="right"/>
 +
<h4>Right: HeLa cells incubated with E.coli strain harbouring Invasiveness Operon. Thanks to FRET between Hirsch dye and GFP infected cells can be seen as a mildly-glowing areas containing bright spots of GFP inside. For more photos visit <a href="http://2010.igem.org/Team:Warsaw/Stage3/Gallery">Gallery of Microphotographs</a>.</h4></div></html></p>
  
 +
<p>Flow Cytometry made it possible to express in numbers what could be seen under the microscope. For each sample during preperatics lysozyme was used to prevent the adhesion of bacteria to the surface of HeLa, but 100% efficiency cannot be expected form this procedure (see HeLa Cells incubated with GFP-producing but non-invasive Top10) The results are as follows:
 +
</p>
 +
<br><br><br><br>
 +
<html>
 +
<div align="center">
  
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/b/b7/Cytometr_TOP_crop.png" width="45%">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/e/ee/Cytometr_GFP_crop.png" width="45%">
 +
<h4>Left: HeLa Cells incubated with non-invasive, non-transformed Top10 E. coli – no fluorescence observed; <br>
 +
Right: HeLa Cells incubated with GFP-producing but non-invasive Top10. Hardly noticeable fluorescence observed.</h4></div>
  
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/2/2e/Cytometr_JPH_crop.png" width="45%"/>
 +
<h4>HeLa Cells incubated with J23102+INV+LLO+GFP-transformed E. coli Top10.</h4></div>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>Two different “populations” of GFP can be observed, depending on two varying fluorescence levels. These represent the amounts of protein (indicated by marker M2 on histograms) still entrapped in endosome and (indicated by marker M3 on histograms) distributed to cytoplasm. This interpretation is based on the results of many previous studies indicating that the GFP is able to act as a pH sensor. </p>
  
 +
<p>The existence of relationship between pH and levels of GFP fluorescence is a commonly known fact. The Microfluidic system was used to investigate this relationship on the FACS machine used for Invasiveness Operon testing. </p>
  
  
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/c/c6/Gfp_different_ph.png">
 +
<br><br>
 +
<p>The data analysis leads to a simple conclusion: The less acidic (closer to neutral) the pH, the stronger the GFP fluorescence. This strongly supports our theory: in the lyzosome (pH~5) weaker fluorescence of GFP is observed than in the cytosol (pH~7).</p>
 +
<br>
  
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/0/0d/FACS_wykres.png">
 +
<h4>HeLa cells incubated with non-transformed Top10, GFP-producing Top10 and AraC Invasiveness Operon-transformed E. coli Top 10 compared to J23102 Invasiveness Operon-harbouring Top10 performance: percentage of GFP delivered to different compartments.</h4>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>Please note the high levels of invaded cells (86,74% and 87,04% for J23102 and pAraC constructs, accordingly). In reference to control experiments (Top10), it has been proven that results up to 10% can be explained by spontaneous uptake. The result for HeLa incubated with GFP-producing, noninvasive Top 10 is explained by both spontaneous uptake and minor adhesion not eliminated by lysozyme. </p>
 +
<br>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/4/40/FACS_cyto-GFP_wykres.png">
 +
<h4>Efficiency of GFP delivery to mammalian cells cytoplasm</h4>
 +
</div>
  
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>Bacteria transormed with this part are able to enter the cytosol of 38,96% of exposed mammalian cells.</h2>
 +
 +
</html>
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here

Latest revision as of 14:17, 19 May 2014

Redflag.png

Safety Flag

The iGEM Safety and Security Committee has placed a Red Flag on this part. This part presents safety risks beyond what is normal for the Registry. Researchers who plan to acquire and use this part should take special care to ensure they use it safely and responsibly. Contact safety [AT] igem [DOT] org with any questions.

Reason: Listeriolysin and Invasin parts

If you are an iGEM team, you must submit a Check-In before acquiring and using this part! See the 2021 Safety Page for more information.


This part is licensed under
Creative BioCommons

invasion device constitutively expressed


Bacteria transormed with this part are able to enter the cytosol of 38,96% of exposed mammalian cells.


Invasin (INV) plays a key role in the initiation of Yersinia enterocolytica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection. Through interaction with a beta1-integrin receptor present on the surface of eucaryotic cell membranes it triggers a signal-transduction pathway leading to internalisation of the whole bacterium in the endocytosis-dependent manner. The strong affinity of invasin to it’s receptor results in highly selective binding to the target molecule. Mammalian cells depleted of beta1-integrin cannot be infected.

Listeriolysin O (LLO) is a member of a widespread cholesterol-dependent pore-forming cytolysins family (CDCs). It's natural role in Listeria monocytogenes is to provide endosomal escape. The first step of the process involves binding of monomeric listeriolysin molecules to lipid bilayer containing cholesterol. The binding induces conformational change that subsequently leads to the formation of a prepores' oligomeric structures (consisting of 33-50 monomers) converting into large (maximum 350A-diameter) pores. This severely disturbs the stability of endosomal membrane and causes it’s rupture.

LLO is a phagosome-specyfic lysin. The acidic pH is necessary for it’s full hemolytic activity. Neutral pH of cytosol causes premature unfolding of TMH domains responsible for aqueous pore formation. This mechanism prevents Listeria spp from killing the host cell and losing the intracellular environment. In case of any tranformed strain it guarantees the lowest possible level of cytotoxicity, incomparable to this involved with the use of any other protein from CDCs family.

Left: Structural model of the LLO monomer from: P. Schnupf , D.A. Portnoy Listeriolysin O: a phagosome-specific lysin, Microbes and infection (2007) 1176-1187

Green Fluorescent Protein is a noninvasive fluorescent marker for gene expression, protein localisation and intracellulat protein targeting. Originally from Aequorea victoria.

Authors:

Cloned by Joanna Leszczyńska.
Created with the use of parts BBa K299810 and BBa K299811 cloned by Marta Błaszkiewicz.

Work supervised by Michał Lower at all levels.

Construct design.

The part consists of J23102 promoter and B0032 RBS ligated to inv gene from Yersinia pestis (horizontal gene transfer form Yersinia pseudotuberculosis). Following elements are B0032 RBS ligated to synthetic gene encoding Listeriolysin, codon usage optimized for E. coli. Aminoacid sequence identical with mature form of LLO from Listeria monocytogenes. Original signal sequence (secretion signal) is omitted since it does not work in E. coli. GFP as marker. Double terminator (B0010+B0012) guarantees the stability of polycistronic RNA as a product of transcription. The construct is a full Invasiveness Operon. To find out more about it's background and design click here.

Safety.

Bacteria transformed with this part are invasive microorganisms. All safety precautions must be taken when manipulating with transformed strain. It involves obligatory use of laboratory gloves. Work under laminar is strongly advised. All waste should be autoclaved to avoid accidental gene transfer to other bacteria and potential rise of pathogenic organism.

Performance


Right: HeLa cells incubated with E.coli strain harbouring Invasiveness Operon. Thanks to FRET between Hirsch dye and GFP infected cells can be seen as a mildly-glowing areas containing bright spots of GFP inside. For more photos visit Gallery of Microphotographs.

Flow Cytometry made it possible to express in numbers what could be seen under the microscope. For each sample during preperatics lysozyme was used to prevent the adhesion of bacteria to the surface of HeLa, but 100% efficiency cannot be expected form this procedure (see HeLa Cells incubated with GFP-producing but non-invasive Top10) The results are as follows:





Left: HeLa Cells incubated with non-invasive, non-transformed Top10 E. coli – no fluorescence observed;
Right: HeLa Cells incubated with GFP-producing but non-invasive Top10. Hardly noticeable fluorescence observed.

HeLa Cells incubated with J23102+INV+LLO+GFP-transformed E. coli Top10.


Two different “populations” of GFP can be observed, depending on two varying fluorescence levels. These represent the amounts of protein (indicated by marker M2 on histograms) still entrapped in endosome and (indicated by marker M3 on histograms) distributed to cytoplasm. This interpretation is based on the results of many previous studies indicating that the GFP is able to act as a pH sensor.

The existence of relationship between pH and levels of GFP fluorescence is a commonly known fact. The Microfluidic system was used to investigate this relationship on the FACS machine used for Invasiveness Operon testing.



The data analysis leads to a simple conclusion: The less acidic (closer to neutral) the pH, the stronger the GFP fluorescence. This strongly supports our theory: in the lyzosome (pH~5) weaker fluorescence of GFP is observed than in the cytosol (pH~7).


HeLa cells incubated with non-transformed Top10, GFP-producing Top10 and AraC Invasiveness Operon-transformed E. coli Top 10 compared to J23102 Invasiveness Operon-harbouring Top10 performance: percentage of GFP delivered to different compartments.


Please note the high levels of invaded cells (86,74% and 87,04% for J23102 and pAraC constructs, accordingly). In reference to control experiments (Top10), it has been proven that results up to 10% can be explained by spontaneous uptake. The result for HeLa incubated with GFP-producing, noninvasive Top 10 is explained by both spontaneous uptake and minor adhesion not eliminated by lysozyme.


Efficiency of GFP delivery to mammalian cells cytoplasm


Bacteria transormed with this part are able to enter the cytosol of 38,96% of exposed mammalian cells.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 7
    Illegal NheI site found at 30
    Illegal NheI site found at 3979
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 813
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1430
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 4862