Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5246036"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Introduction=== | ===Introduction=== | ||
+ | Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project <HTML><b><a href="https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania" target="_blank">Synhesion</a></b></html> aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - <I> Caulobacter crescentus </I> and <I> Hirschia baltica </I> - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars, anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used <I>Escherichia coli</I> bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel <I>E. coli</I> strain for more efficient production of adhesives. | ||
===Strain description=== | ===Strain description=== | ||
+ | Escherichia coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS protein expression strain derived from Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) designed to enhance the expression of proteins that contain codons rarely used in E. coli and have chloramphenicol-resistant plasmid. It produces recombinant proteins under the control of T7 RNA polymerase [1]. pLysS strains express T7 lysozyme, which further suppresses basal expression of T7 RNA polymerase before induction, thus stabilizing pET recombinants encoding target proteins that affect cell growth and viability [2], [3]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html lang="en"> | ||
+ | <head> | ||
+ | <meta charset="UTF-8"> | ||
+ | <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> | ||
+ | <title>Genotype Table</title> | ||
+ | </head> | ||
+ | <body> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table border="1" cellpadding="10"> | ||
+ | <caption>Table 1. Genotype of Rosetta(DE3)pLysS E. coli strain</caption> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Strain</th> | ||
+ | <th>Genotype</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Rosetta(DE3)pLysS</td> | ||
+ | <td>F- ompT hsdSB(rB- mB-) gal dcm (DE3) pLysSRARE2 (Cam<sup>R</sup>)</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
− | WecA is Undecaprenyl-phosphate | + | ====Biology==== |
+ | The enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) is an outer membrane glycolipid shared by all members of the Enterobacteriaceae and is restricted to this family. It is a glycophospholipid located in the outer leaflet of the outer membrane, composed of an L-glycerophosphatidyl residue linked to an aminosugar heteropolymer [4]. The carbohydrate consists of trisaccharide repeat units of N-acetyl-α-D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-β-D-mannosaminuronate, and N-acetylthomosamine [5]. The function of this molecule has remained largely unknown, partly because the biosynthesis pathways for ECA, O-antigen, and peptidoglycan overlap and partly because there are three forms of ECA that cannot currently be genetically separated [6]. Current research suggests that its function is to maintain outer membrane stability and immunogenicity, and it is involved in biofilm formation [7], [8],[9]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | WecA is Undecaprenyl-phosphate α-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase, which initiates the biosynthesis of enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) and O-antigen by catalyzing the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)-1-phosphate onto undecaprenyl phosphate to form Und-P-P-GlcNAc[10]. The O antigen is located on the cell surface and could be recognized by the host immune system and bacteriophages [11]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Eliminating the wecA gene results in ECA and lipopolysaccharide 08-side chain inactivation without causing high-stress levels [12]. | ||
+ | ====Usage==== | ||
+ | <i>Escherichia coli</I> Rosetta(DE3)pLysS protein expression strain is used to produce recombinant proteins under the control of T7 RNA polymerase [1]. Rosetta(DE3)pLysS is widely used in both research and industrial settings. It is particularly popular due to its high efficiency in producing recombinant proteins. More specifically, it is widely used as medical diagnostic reagents in human healthcare, including vaccines, drugs, or antibodies, and in biochemical analysis[13]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Knocking out the <i>wecA</I> gene and inactivating the ECA pathway loads off the metabolic burden of synthesizing polysaccharides. It prevents ECA biosynthesis and increases precursor availability for peptidoglycan biosynthesis [14]. Rosetta(DE3)pLysS∆wecA strain could be used to investigate the ECA pathway further and the cell interactions with other cells or bacteriophages. This strain could be used in biotechnology as cells with altered surface properties. Biofilms are increasingly recognized as a critical global issue in many industries and come out with economic costs. Biofilms contaminate manufacturing equipment and pharmaceuticals, compromising product quality and safety. Biofilms can foul heat exchangers, pipelines, and other industrial equipment, leading to decreased performance and increased energy consumption. A strain with reduced biofilm formation could save power consumption and finances [15]. On top of that, exposed glycan structures often serve as initial receptors for host - N4 bacteriophage - recognition. Subsequent binding to a terminal or secondary receptor directly on the cell surface triggers irreversible adsorption and injection of the phage genome. [16] N4 bacteriophage infects industrially grown bacteria. Eliminating recognition antigens on these bacteria could provide them additional resistance to N4 phage infection. [17]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In our project, Synhesion, we aimed to produce an efficient polysaccharide in <i>E. coli</I> by introducing a new synthesis pathway. This pathway originated from the bacteria <i>C. crescentus</> and <i>H. baltica</I>, which inhabit aquatic environments. Although polysaccharide synthesis pathways in <i>E. coli</i> and marine bacteria are analogous, we aimed to engineer an <i>E. coli</I> strain that could produce desired polysaccharides more efficiently by reducing its metabolic burden. For this reason, we chose to eliminate the polysaccharide-producing ECA pathway from <i>E. coli</I> by knocking out the <i>wecA</I> gene. | ||
===Sequence and Features=== | ===Sequence and Features=== | ||
Line 17: | Line 53: | ||
===Experimental characterization=== | ===Experimental characterization=== | ||
+ | To create an ECA pathway deficient E. coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS∆wecA strain, we used a homology recombineering <b>Red/ET recombination system</B>. Our edited colonies had kanamycin-resistance cassettes as markers in the edited region, and we tested them by colony PCR (Fig 1.). We could distinguish edited and non-edited colonies by size: PCR’ed non-edited region 1544 bp and with edited region 1840 bp. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <div class="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/registry/rosetta-weca-ko.webp | ||
+ | " style="width:500px;"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <figcaption><center><b> Fig. 1. </b> Knocked out wecA gene in E.coli strain Rosetta(DE3)pLysS(DE3). C- is the wecA gene and its region from an unedited strain (~1.5 kb), and C+ is the kanamycin cassette, indicating knockout (~1.8 kb). 1-10 is the cPCR of knocked-out colonies. Colonies the same size as C+ indicate a knockout. M - molecular weight ladder, GeneRuler Mix DNA Ladder (Thermo Scientific). 1% agarose gel in TAE buffer with EtBr. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </center></figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | 1.Langenscheid, J., Killmann, H., & Braun, V. (2004). A FhuA mutant of Escherichia coli is infected by phage T1 independent of TonB. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 234(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.03.019 | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 2.Tegel, H., Tourle, S., Ottosson, J., & Persson, A. (2010). Increased levels of recombinant human proteins with the Escherichia coli strain Rosetta(DE3). Protein Expression and Purification, 69(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2009.08.017 | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 3.Fu, W., Lin, J., & Cen, P. (2007). 5-Aminolevulinate production with recombinant Escherichia coli using a rare codon optimizer host strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 75(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0887-y | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 4.Rick, P. D., Hubbard, G. L., & Barr, K. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the synthesis of the O8 antigen in Escherichia coli K-12. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(9), 2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.9.2877-2884.1994 | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 5.Klena, J. D., & Schnaitman, C. A. (1993). Function of the rfb gene cluster and the rfe gene in the synthesis of O antigen by Shigella dysenteriae 1. Molecular Microbiology, 9(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01705.x | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 6.Alexander, D. C., & Valvano, M. A. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli O7-specific lipopolysaccharide and other O-specific polysaccharides containing N-acetylglucosamine. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(22), 7079–7084. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.22.7079-7084.1994 | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 7.Sala, R. F., Morgan, P. M., & Tanner, M. E. (1996). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(12), 3033–3034. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja960266z | ||
+ | <BR> | ||
+ | 8.Jorgenson, M. A., Kannan, S., Laubacher, M. E., & Young, K. D. (2016). Dead-end intermediates in the enterobacterial common antigen pathway induce morphological defects in Escherichia coli by competing for undecaprenyl phosphate. Molecular Microbiology, 100(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13304 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 9.Zeidan, A. A., Poulsen, V. K., Janzen, T., Buldo, P., Derkx, P. M. F., Øregaard, G., & Neves, A. R. (2017). Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: From genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(Suppl_1), S168–S200. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux017 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 10.Rai, A. K., Carr, J. F., Bautista, D. E., Wang, W., & Mitchell, A. M. (2021). ElyC and cyclic enterobacterial common antigen regulate synthesis of phosphoglyceride-linked enterobacterial common antigen. mBio, 12(5), e02846-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02846-21 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 11.Highmore, C. J., Melaugh, G., Morris, R. J., & Rice, S. A. (2022). Translational challenges and opportunities in biofilm science: A BRIEF for the future. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 8(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00327-7 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 12.Nobrega, F. L., Vlot, M., de Jonge, P. A., Drost, M., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2018). Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(12), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0070-8 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 13.McPartland, J., & Rothman-Denes, L. B. (2009). The tail sheath of bacteriophage N4 interacts with the Escherichia coli receptor. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(2), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01423-08 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 14.Rick, P. D., Hubbard, G. L., & Barr, K. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the synthesis of the O8 antigen in Escherichia coli K-12. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(9), 2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.9.2877-2884.1994 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 15.Klena, J. D., & Schnaitman, C. A. (1993). Function of the rfb gene cluster and the rfe gene in the synthesis of O antigen by Shigella dysenteriae 1. Molecular Microbiology, 9(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01705.x | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 16.Alexander, D. C., & Valvano, M. A. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli O7-specific lipopolysaccharide and other O-specific polysaccharides containing N-acetylglucosamine. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(22), 7079–7084. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.22.7079-7084.1994 | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 17.Sala, R. F., Morgan, P. M., & Tanner, M. E. (1996). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(12), 3033–3034. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja960266z | ||
+ | <br> |
Latest revision as of 19:29, 1 October 2024
Rosetta(DE3)pLysS ΔWecA
Introduction
Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project Synhesion aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - Caulobacter crescentus and Hirschia baltica - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars, anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used Escherichia coli bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel E. coli strain for more efficient production of adhesives.
Strain description
Escherichia coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS protein expression strain derived from Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) designed to enhance the expression of proteins that contain codons rarely used in E. coli and have chloramphenicol-resistant plasmid. It produces recombinant proteins under the control of T7 RNA polymerase [1]. pLysS strains express T7 lysozyme, which further suppresses basal expression of T7 RNA polymerase before induction, thus stabilizing pET recombinants encoding target proteins that affect cell growth and viability [2], [3].
Strain | Genotype |
---|---|
Rosetta(DE3)pLysS | F- ompT hsdSB(rB- mB-) gal dcm (DE3) pLysSRARE2 (CamR) |
Usage and Biology
Biology
The enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) is an outer membrane glycolipid shared by all members of the Enterobacteriaceae and is restricted to this family. It is a glycophospholipid located in the outer leaflet of the outer membrane, composed of an L-glycerophosphatidyl residue linked to an aminosugar heteropolymer [4]. The carbohydrate consists of trisaccharide repeat units of N-acetyl-α-D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-β-D-mannosaminuronate, and N-acetylthomosamine [5]. The function of this molecule has remained largely unknown, partly because the biosynthesis pathways for ECA, O-antigen, and peptidoglycan overlap and partly because there are three forms of ECA that cannot currently be genetically separated [6]. Current research suggests that its function is to maintain outer membrane stability and immunogenicity, and it is involved in biofilm formation [7], [8],[9].
WecA is Undecaprenyl-phosphate α-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase, which initiates the biosynthesis of enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) and O-antigen by catalyzing the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)-1-phosphate onto undecaprenyl phosphate to form Und-P-P-GlcNAc[10]. The O antigen is located on the cell surface and could be recognized by the host immune system and bacteriophages [11].
Eliminating the wecA gene results in ECA and lipopolysaccharide 08-side chain inactivation without causing high-stress levels [12].
Usage
Escherichia coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS protein expression strain is used to produce recombinant proteins under the control of T7 RNA polymerase [1]. Rosetta(DE3)pLysS is widely used in both research and industrial settings. It is particularly popular due to its high efficiency in producing recombinant proteins. More specifically, it is widely used as medical diagnostic reagents in human healthcare, including vaccines, drugs, or antibodies, and in biochemical analysis[13].
Knocking out the wecA gene and inactivating the ECA pathway loads off the metabolic burden of synthesizing polysaccharides. It prevents ECA biosynthesis and increases precursor availability for peptidoglycan biosynthesis [14]. Rosetta(DE3)pLysS∆wecA strain could be used to investigate the ECA pathway further and the cell interactions with other cells or bacteriophages. This strain could be used in biotechnology as cells with altered surface properties. Biofilms are increasingly recognized as a critical global issue in many industries and come out with economic costs. Biofilms contaminate manufacturing equipment and pharmaceuticals, compromising product quality and safety. Biofilms can foul heat exchangers, pipelines, and other industrial equipment, leading to decreased performance and increased energy consumption. A strain with reduced biofilm formation could save power consumption and finances [15]. On top of that, exposed glycan structures often serve as initial receptors for host - N4 bacteriophage - recognition. Subsequent binding to a terminal or secondary receptor directly on the cell surface triggers irreversible adsorption and injection of the phage genome. [16] N4 bacteriophage infects industrially grown bacteria. Eliminating recognition antigens on these bacteria could provide them additional resistance to N4 phage infection. [17].
In our project, Synhesion, we aimed to produce an efficient polysaccharide in E. coli by introducing a new synthesis pathway. This pathway originated from the bacteria C. crescentus</> and <i>H. baltica, which inhabit aquatic environments. Although polysaccharide synthesis pathways in E. coli and marine bacteria are analogous, we aimed to engineer an E. coli strain that could produce desired polysaccharides more efficiently by reducing its metabolic burden. For this reason, we chose to eliminate the polysaccharide-producing ECA pathway from E. coli by knocking out the wecA gene.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal XbaI site found at 128
Illegal XbaI site found at 1350
Illegal PstI site found at 106
Illegal PstI site found at 693 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal PstI site found at 106
Illegal PstI site found at 693 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 480
Illegal BamHI site found at 94 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal XbaI site found at 128
Illegal XbaI site found at 1350
Illegal PstI site found at 106
Illegal PstI site found at 693 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal XbaI site found at 128
Illegal XbaI site found at 1350
Illegal PstI site found at 106
Illegal PstI site found at 693
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1144 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 993
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1203
Functional Parameters
genotype | F- ompT hsdSB(rB- mB-) gal dcm (DE3) pLysSRARE (CamR)(KanR) ΔwecA |
Experimental characterization
To create an ECA pathway deficient E. coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS∆wecA strain, we used a homology recombineering Red/ET recombination system. Our edited colonies had kanamycin-resistance cassettes as markers in the edited region, and we tested them by colony PCR (Fig 1.). We could distinguish edited and non-edited colonies by size: PCR’ed non-edited region 1544 bp and with edited region 1840 bp.
References
1.Langenscheid, J., Killmann, H., & Braun, V. (2004). A FhuA mutant of Escherichia coli is infected by phage T1 independent of TonB. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 234(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.03.019
2.Tegel, H., Tourle, S., Ottosson, J., & Persson, A. (2010). Increased levels of recombinant human proteins with the Escherichia coli strain Rosetta(DE3). Protein Expression and Purification, 69(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2009.08.017
3.Fu, W., Lin, J., & Cen, P. (2007). 5-Aminolevulinate production with recombinant Escherichia coli using a rare codon optimizer host strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 75(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0887-y
4.Rick, P. D., Hubbard, G. L., & Barr, K. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the synthesis of the O8 antigen in Escherichia coli K-12. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(9), 2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.9.2877-2884.1994
5.Klena, J. D., & Schnaitman, C. A. (1993). Function of the rfb gene cluster and the rfe gene in the synthesis of O antigen by Shigella dysenteriae 1. Molecular Microbiology, 9(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01705.x
6.Alexander, D. C., & Valvano, M. A. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli O7-specific lipopolysaccharide and other O-specific polysaccharides containing N-acetylglucosamine. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(22), 7079–7084. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.22.7079-7084.1994
7.Sala, R. F., Morgan, P. M., & Tanner, M. E. (1996). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(12), 3033–3034. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja960266z
8.Jorgenson, M. A., Kannan, S., Laubacher, M. E., & Young, K. D. (2016). Dead-end intermediates in the enterobacterial common antigen pathway induce morphological defects in Escherichia coli by competing for undecaprenyl phosphate. Molecular Microbiology, 100(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13304
9.Zeidan, A. A., Poulsen, V. K., Janzen, T., Buldo, P., Derkx, P. M. F., Øregaard, G., & Neves, A. R. (2017). Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: From genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(Suppl_1), S168–S200. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux017
10.Rai, A. K., Carr, J. F., Bautista, D. E., Wang, W., & Mitchell, A. M. (2021). ElyC and cyclic enterobacterial common antigen regulate synthesis of phosphoglyceride-linked enterobacterial common antigen. mBio, 12(5), e02846-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02846-21
11.Highmore, C. J., Melaugh, G., Morris, R. J., & Rice, S. A. (2022). Translational challenges and opportunities in biofilm science: A BRIEF for the future. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 8(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00327-7
12.Nobrega, F. L., Vlot, M., de Jonge, P. A., Drost, M., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2018). Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(12), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0070-8
13.McPartland, J., & Rothman-Denes, L. B. (2009). The tail sheath of bacteriophage N4 interacts with the Escherichia coli receptor. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(2), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01423-08
14.Rick, P. D., Hubbard, G. L., & Barr, K. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the synthesis of the O8 antigen in Escherichia coli K-12. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(9), 2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.9.2877-2884.1994
15.Klena, J. D., & Schnaitman, C. A. (1993). Function of the rfb gene cluster and the rfe gene in the synthesis of O antigen by Shigella dysenteriae 1. Molecular Microbiology, 9(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01705.x
16.Alexander, D. C., & Valvano, M. A. (1994). Role of the rfe gene in the biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli O7-specific lipopolysaccharide and other O-specific polysaccharides containing N-acetylglucosamine. Journal of Bacteriology, 176(22), 7079–7084. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.22.7079-7084.1994
17.Sala, R. F., Morgan, P. M., & Tanner, M. E. (1996). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(12), 3033–3034. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja960266z